From 83c08ba0c97798e7da2d4e74722ece534d0f8620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 18:13:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix typos in packages.md

---
 depends/packages.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/depends/packages.md b/depends/packages.md
index 7ed20ea1297..4158b46d28d 100644
--- a/depends/packages.md
+++ b/depends/packages.md
@@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ not sufficient to just say `libprimary`.
 For us, it's much easier to just link a static `libsecondary` into a shared
 `libprimary`. Especially because in our case, we are linking against a dummy
 `libprimary` anyway that we'll throw away. We don't care if the end-user has a
-static or dynamic `libseconday`, that's not our concern. With a static
-`libseconday`, when we need to link `libprimary` into our executable, there's no
+static or dynamic `libsecondary`, that's not our concern. With a static
+`libsecondary`, when we need to link `libprimary` into our executable, there's no
 dependency chain to worry about as `libprimary` has all the symbols.
 
 ## Build targets: