diff --git a/BENCHMARK.md b/BENCHMARK.md
index 4901d3fc..30e73db2 100644
--- a/BENCHMARK.md
+++ b/BENCHMARK.md
@@ -1,281 +1,3 @@
# imgproxy vs alternatives benchmark
-## Setup
-
-- c5.xlarge AWS instance: 4 CPUs, 8 GB RAM
-- Ubuntu 18.04
-- Go 1.12
-- Python 2.7
-- Vips 8.7.4
-
-All the tools were launched with their default settings except the following (where applicable):
-
-- Concurrency was set to 8;
-- Filesystem image source was configured. Where not applicable, local nginx was used as the image source.
-
-## Benchmarking
-
-We used [Apache HTTP server benchmarking tool](https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/ab.html) (a.k.a `ab`):
-
-```bash
-ab -n 1000 -c 4 $url
-```
-
-The source image is a [photo of Wat Arun](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/The_sculptures_of_two_mythical_giant_demons%2C_Thotsakan_and_Sahatsadecha%2C_guarding_the_eastern_gate_of_the_main_chapel_of_Wat_Arun%2C_Bangkok.jpg) (JPEG, 7360x4912, 29MB).
-
-The tools were requested to resize it to fit 500x500.
-
-## Tested tools
-
-- [imgproxy](https://github.com/imgproxy/imgproxy) itself, v2.2.13
-
- URL: `/unsigned/rs:fit:500:0/plain/local:///wat-arun.jpg`
-
-- [thumbor](https://github.com/thumbor/thumbor), v6.7.0
-
- URL: `/unsafe/500x0/wat-arun.jpg`
-
-- [imaginary](https://github.com/h2non/imaginary), master branch ([519c5ff](https://github.com/h2non/imaginary/tree/519c5ffc2c0b1bbae1b100a24acb2241474f11bd))
-
- URL: `/fit?width=500&height=500&file=wat-arun.jpg`
-
-- [Pilbox](https://github.com/agschwender/pilbox), v1.3.4
-
- URL: `/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.dev.com%2Fwat-arun.jpg&w=500&h=500&mode=clip`
-
-- [picfit](https://github.com/thoas/picfit), master branch ([fff7d2e](https://github.com/thoas/picfit/tree/fff7d2e83d23b1c716fed484bb5d0775a49c9a71))
-
- URL: `/display/resize/500x0/wat-arun.jpg`
-
-- [imageproxy](https://github.com/willnorris/imageproxy), master branch ([d4246a0](https://github.com/willnorris/imageproxy/tree/d4246a08fdec341ddf01b09e74e56ee03f9929d0))
-
- URL: `/500x/http://images.dev.com/wat-arun.jpg`
-
-## Results
-
-| Tool | Time taken for tests
(sec) | Requests per second | Time per request
(ms, mean) | Memory peak usage
(MB) | Result file size
(KB) |
-| :------------ | -------------------------: | ------------------: | ---------------------------: | ---------------------: | --------------------: |
-| imgproxy | 103.405 | 9.67 | 413.618 | 194 | 43.51 |
-| thumbor | 160.505 | 6.23 | 642.021 | 461 | 45.10 |
-| imaginary | 104.873 | 9.54 | 419.494 | 562 | 92.93 |
-| Pilbox | 179.482 | 5.57 | 717.927 | 1060 | 95.64 |
-| picfit | 1220.412 | 0.82 | 4881.646 | 1934 | 98.67 |
-| imageproxy | 1209.361 | 0.83 | 4837.443 | 2392 | 98.74 |
-
-## Detailed results
-
-### imgproxy
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 103.405 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 44855000 bytes
-HTML transferred: 44559000 bytes
-Requests per second: 9.67 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 413.618 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 103.405 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 423.61 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
-Processing: 323 413 5.6 413 446
-Waiting: 323 413 5.6 412 446
-Total: 323 413 5.6 413 446
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 413
- 66% 414
- 75% 416
- 80% 417
- 90% 419
- 95% 422
- 98% 426
- 99% 429
- 100% 446 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 194 [MB]
-Result file size: 43.51 [KB]
-```
-
-### thumbor
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 160.505 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 46435000 bytes
-HTML transferred: 46180000 bytes
-Requests per second: 6.23 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 642.021 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 160.505 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 282.52 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
-Processing: 586 642 12.3 641 886
-Waiting: 586 641 12.3 641 886
-Total: 586 642 12.3 641 886
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 641
- 66% 644
- 75% 646
- 80% 647
- 90% 650
- 95% 652
- 98% 657
- 99% 658
- 100% 886 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 461 [MB]
-Result file size: 45.10 [KB]
-```
-
-### imaginary
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 104.873 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 95389568 bytes
-HTML transferred: 95166000 bytes
-Requests per second: 9.54 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 419.494 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 104.873 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 888.25 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
-Processing: 310 419 6.4 418 459
-Waiting: 310 418 6.4 418 459
-Total: 310 419 6.4 418 460
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 418
- 66% 420
- 75% 421
- 80% 422
- 90% 425
- 95% 428
- 98% 432
- 99% 437
- 100% 460 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 562 [MB]
-Result file size: 92.93 [KB]
-```
-
-### Pilbox
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 179.482 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 98164000 bytes
-HTML transferred: 97934000 bytes
-Requests per second: 5.57 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 717.927 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 179.482 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 534.11 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 1
-Processing: 456 717 232.5 658 1851
-Waiting: 456 717 232.5 657 1851
-Total: 457 717 232.5 658 1851
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 658
- 66% 663
- 75% 668
- 80% 674
- 90% 1176
- 95% 1278
- 98% 1340
- 99% 1618
- 100% 1851 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 1060 [MB]
-Result file size: 95.64 [KB]
-```
-
-### picfit
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 1220.412 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 101206000 bytes
-HTML transferred: 101038000 bytes
-Requests per second: 0.82 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 4881.646 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 1220.412 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 80.98 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
-Processing: 2322 4875 118.6 4880 5265
-Waiting: 2322 4874 118.6 4879 5265
-Total: 2322 4875 118.6 4880 5265
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 4880
- 66% 4906
- 75% 4924
- 80% 4936
- 90% 4978
- 95% 5009
- 98% 5078
- 99% 5124
- 100% 5265 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 1934 [MB]
-Result file size: 98.67 [KB]
-```
-
-### imageproxy
-
-```
-Concurrency Level: 4
-Time taken for tests: 1209.361 seconds
-Complete requests: 1000
-Failed requests: 0
-Total transferred: 101318000 bytes
-HTML transferred: 101108000 bytes
-Requests per second: 0.83 [#/sec] (mean)
-Time per request: 4837.443 [ms] (mean)
-Time per request: 1209.361 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-Transfer rate: 81.81 [Kbytes/sec] received
-
-Connection Times (ms)
- min mean[+/-sd] median max
-Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
-Processing: 4520 4837 74.9 4838 5090
-Waiting: 4520 4836 74.7 4837 5086
-Total: 4520 4837 74.9 4838 5090
-
-Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
- 50% 4838
- 66% 4865
- 75% 4884
- 80% 4895
- 90% 4931
- 95% 4960
- 98% 4993
- 99% 5026
- 100% 5090 (longest request)
-
-Memory peak usage: 2392 [MB]
-Result file size: 98.74 [KB]
-```
+You can find the results of the new benchmark in [the blog article](https://imgproxy.net/blog/image-processing-servers-benchmark/).
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 15588c2c..c1473890 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ imgproxy takes advantage of probably the most efficient image processing library
imgproxy uses Go’s raw (no wrappers) native `net/http` package to omit any overhead while processing requests and provides the best possible HTTP support.
-You can take a look at some benchmarking results and compare imgproxy with some well-known alternatives in our [benchmark report](https://github.com/imgproxy/imgproxy/blob/master/BENCHMARK.md).
+You can take a look at some benchmarking results and compare imgproxy with some well-known alternatives in our [benchmark report](https://imgproxy.net/blog/image-processing-servers-benchmark/).
#### Security