diff --git a/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go b/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go
index 407a76641..1dc147aa4 100644
--- a/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go
+++ b/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go
@@ -17,6 +17,152 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 )
 
+// testSendPaymentAMPInvoice tests that we can send an AMP payment to a
+// specified AMP invoice using SendPaymentV2.
+func testSendPaymentAMPInvoice(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
+	ctxb := context.Background()
+
+	ctx := newMppTestContext(t, net)
+	defer ctx.shutdownNodes()
+
+	const paymentAmt = btcutil.Amount(300000)
+
+	// Set up a network with three different paths Alice <-> Bob. Channel
+	// capacities are set such that the payment can only succeed if (at
+	// least) three paths are used.
+	//
+	//              _ Eve _
+	//             /       \
+	// Alice -- Carol ---- Bob
+	//      \              /
+	//       \__ Dave ____/
+	//
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.carol, ctx.bob, 135000)
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.alice, ctx.carol, 235000)
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.dave, ctx.bob, 135000)
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.alice, ctx.dave, 135000)
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.eve, ctx.bob, 135000)
+	ctx.openChannel(ctx.carol, ctx.eve, 135000)
+
+	defer ctx.closeChannels()
+
+	ctx.waitForChannels()
+
+	// Subscribe to bob's invoices.
+	req := &lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription{}
+	ctxc, cancelSubscription := context.WithCancel(ctxb)
+	bobInvoiceSubscription, err := ctx.bob.SubscribeInvoices(ctxc, req)
+	require.NoError(t.t, err)
+	defer cancelSubscription()
+
+	addInvoiceResp, err := ctx.bob.AddInvoice(context.Background(), &lnrpc.Invoice{
+		Value: int64(paymentAmt),
+		IsAmp: true,
+	})
+	require.NoError(t.t, err)
+
+	// Ensure we get a notification of the invoice being added by Bob.
+	rpcInvoice, err := bobInvoiceSubscription.Recv()
+	require.NoError(t.t, err)
+
+	require.False(t.t, rpcInvoice.Settled) // nolint:staticcheck
+	require.Equal(t.t, lnrpc.Invoice_OPEN, rpcInvoice.State)
+	require.Equal(t.t, int64(0), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidSat)
+	require.Equal(t.t, int64(0), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidMsat)
+
+	require.Equal(t.t, 0, len(rpcInvoice.Htlcs))
+
+	// Increase Dave's fee to make the test deterministic. Otherwise it
+	// would be unpredictable whether pathfinding would go through Charlie
+	// or Dave for the first shard.
+	_, err = ctx.dave.UpdateChannelPolicy(
+		context.Background(),
+		&lnrpc.PolicyUpdateRequest{
+			Scope:         &lnrpc.PolicyUpdateRequest_Global{Global: true},
+			BaseFeeMsat:   500000,
+			FeeRate:       0.001,
+			TimeLockDelta: 40,
+		},
+	)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("dave policy update: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	ctxt, _ := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 4*defaultTimeout)
+	payment := sendAndAssertSuccess(
+		ctxt, t, ctx.alice,
+		&routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
+			PaymentRequest: addInvoiceResp.PaymentRequest,
+			TimeoutSeconds: 60,
+			FeeLimitMsat:   noFeeLimitMsat,
+		},
+	)
+
+	// Check that Alice split the payment in at least three shards. Because
+	// the hand-off of the htlc to the link is asynchronous (via a mailbox),
+	// there is some non-determinism in the process. Depending on whether
+	// the new pathfinding round is started before or after the htlc is
+	// locked into the channel, different sharding may occur. Therefore we
+	// can only check if the number of shards isn't below the theoretical
+	// minimum.
+	succeeded := 0
+	for _, htlc := range payment.Htlcs {
+		if htlc.Status == lnrpc.HTLCAttempt_SUCCEEDED {
+			succeeded++
+		}
+	}
+
+	const minExpectedShards = 3
+	if succeeded < minExpectedShards {
+		t.Fatalf("expected at least %v shards, but got %v",
+			minExpectedShards, succeeded)
+	}
+
+	// There should now be a settle event for the invoice.
+	rpcInvoice, err = bobInvoiceSubscription.Recv()
+	require.NoError(t.t, err)
+
+	// Also fetch Bob's invoice from ListInvoices and assert it is equal to
+	// the one recevied via the subscription.
+	invoiceResp, err := ctx.bob.ListInvoices(
+		ctxb, &lnrpc.ListInvoiceRequest{},
+	)
+	require.NoError(t.t, err)
+	require.Equal(t.t, 1, len(invoiceResp.Invoices))
+	assertInvoiceEqual(t.t, rpcInvoice, invoiceResp.Invoices[0])
+
+	// Assert that the invoice is settled for the total payment amount and
+	// has the correct payment address.
+	require.True(t.t, rpcInvoice.Settled) // nolint:staticcheck
+	require.Equal(t.t, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, rpcInvoice.State)
+	require.Equal(t.t, int64(paymentAmt), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidSat)
+	require.Equal(t.t, int64(paymentAmt*1000), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidMsat)
+
+	// Finally, assert that the same set id is recorded for each htlc, and
+	// that the preimage hash pair is valid.
+	var setID []byte
+	require.Equal(t.t, succeeded, len(rpcInvoice.Htlcs))
+	for _, htlc := range rpcInvoice.Htlcs {
+		require.NotNil(t.t, htlc.Amp)
+		if setID == nil {
+			setID = make([]byte, 32)
+			copy(setID, htlc.Amp.SetId)
+		}
+		require.Equal(t.t, setID, htlc.Amp.SetId)
+
+		// Parse the child hash and child preimage, and assert they are
+		// well-formed.
+		childHash, err := lntypes.MakeHash(htlc.Amp.Hash)
+		require.NoError(t.t, err)
+		childPreimage, err := lntypes.MakePreimage(htlc.Amp.Preimage)
+		require.NoError(t.t, err)
+
+		// Assert that the preimage actually matches the hashes.
+		validPreimage := childPreimage.Matches(childHash)
+		require.True(t.t, validPreimage)
+	}
+}
+
 // testSendPaymentAMP tests that we can send an AMP payment to a specified
 // destination using SendPaymentV2.
 func testSendPaymentAMP(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
diff --git a/lntest/itest/lnd_test_list_on_test.go b/lntest/itest/lnd_test_list_on_test.go
index 15a660f02..d5ecc34a3 100644
--- a/lntest/itest/lnd_test_list_on_test.go
+++ b/lntest/itest/lnd_test_list_on_test.go
@@ -278,7 +278,10 @@ var allTestCases = []*testCase{
 		name: "sendpayment amp",
 		test: testSendPaymentAMP,
 	},
-
+	{
+		name: "sendpayment amp invoice",
+		test: testSendPaymentAMPInvoice,
+	},
 	{
 		name: "send multi path payment",
 		test: testSendMultiPathPayment,