routing: bugfix for mc reporting of blinded paths

When reporting an error  or a success case of a payment to a
blinded paths, the amounts to forward for intermediate hops
are set to 0 so we need to use the receiver amount instead.

routing/result_interpretation.go

@@ -100,8 +100,27 @@ func interpretResult(rt *mcRoute,
 
 // processSuccess processes a successful payment attempt.
 func (i *interpretedResult) processSuccess(route *mcRoute) {
-	// For successes, all nodes must have acted in the right way. Therefore
+	// For successes, all nodes must have acted in the right way.
-	// we mark all of them with a success result.
+	// Therefore we mark all of them with a success result. However we need
+	// to handle the blinded route part separately because for intermediate
+	// blinded nodes the amount field is set to zero so we use the receiver
+	// amount.
+	introIdx, isBlinded := introductionPointIndex(route)
+	if isBlinded {
+		// Report success for all the pairs until the introduction
+		// point.
+		i.successPairRange(route, 0, introIdx-1)
+
+		// Handle the blinded route part.
+		//
+		// NOTE: The introIdx index here does describe the node after
+		// the introduction point.
+		i.markBlindedRouteSuccess(route, introIdx)
+
+		return
+	}
+
+	// Mark nodes as successful in the non-blinded case of the payment.
 	i.successPairRange(route, 0, len(route.hops.Val)-1)
 }
 
@@ -517,11 +536,22 @@ func (i *interpretedResult) processPaymentOutcomeIntermediate(route *mcRoute,
 		if introIdx == len(route.hops.Val)-1 {
 			i.finalFailureReason = &reasonError
 		} else {
-			// If there are other hops between the recipient and
+			// We penalize the final hop of the blinded route which
-			// introduction node, then we just penalize the last
+			// is sufficient to not reuse this route again and is
-			// hop in the blinded route to minimize the storage of
+			// also more memory efficient because the other hops
-			// results for ephemeral keys.
+			// of the blinded path are ephemeral and will only be
-			i.failPairBalance(route, len(route.hops.Val)-1)
+			// used in conjunction with the final hop. Moreover we
+			// don't want to punish the introduction node because
+			// the blinded failure does not necessarily mean that
+			// the introduction node was at fault.
+			//
+			// TODO(ziggie): Make sure we only keep mc data for
+			// blinded paths, in both the success and failure case,
+			// in memory during the time of the payment and remove
+			// it afterwards. Blinded paths and their blinded hop
+			// keys are always changing per blinded route so there
+			// is no point in persisting this data.
+			i.failBlindedRoute(route)
 		}
 
 	// In all other cases, we penalize the reporting node. These are all
@@ -828,6 +858,41 @@ func (i *interpretedResult) successPairRange(rt *mcRoute, fromIdx, toIdx int) {
 	}
 }
 
+// failBlindedRoute marks a blinded route as failed for the specific amount to
+// send by only punishing the last pair.
+func (i *interpretedResult) failBlindedRoute(rt *mcRoute) {
+	// We fail the last pair of the route, in order to fail the complete
+	// blinded route. This is because the combination of ephemeral pubkeys
+	// is unique to the route. We fail the last pair in order to not punish
+	// the introduction node, since we don't want to disincentivize them
+	// from providing that service.
+	pair, _ := getPair(rt, len(rt.hops.Val)-1)
+
+	// Since all the hops along a blinded path don't have any amount set, we
+	// extract the minimal amount to punish from the value that is tried to
+	// be sent to the receiver.
+	amt := rt.hops.Val[len(rt.hops.Val)-1].amtToFwd.Val
+
+	i.pairResults[pair] = failPairResult(amt)
+}
+
+// markBlindedRouteSuccess marks the hops of the blinded route AFTER the
+// introduction node as successful.
+//
+// NOTE: The introIdx must be the index of the first hop of the blinded route
+// AFTER the introduction node.
+func (i *interpretedResult) markBlindedRouteSuccess(rt *mcRoute, introIdx int) {
+	// For blinded hops we do not have the forwarding amount so we take the
+	// minimal amount which went through the route by looking at the last
+	// hop.
+	successAmt := rt.hops.Val[len(rt.hops.Val)-1].amtToFwd.Val
+	for idx := introIdx; idx < len(rt.hops.Val); idx++ {
+		pair, _ := getPair(rt, idx)
+
+		i.pairResults[pair] = successPairResult(successAmt)
+	}
+}
+
 // getPair returns a node pair from the route and the amount passed between that
 // pair.
 func getPair(rt *mcRoute, channelIdx int) (DirectedNodePair,

routing/result_interpretation_test.go

@@ -96,13 +96,17 @@ var (
 				AmtToForward: 99,
 			},
 			{
-				PubKeyBytes:   hops[2],
+				PubKeyBytes: hops[2],
-				AmtToForward:  95,
+				// Intermediate blinded hops don't have an
+				// amount set.
+				AmtToForward:  0,
 				BlindingPoint: genTestPubKey(),
 			},
 			{
-				PubKeyBytes:  hops[3],
+				PubKeyBytes: hops[3],
-				AmtToForward: 88,
+				// Intermediate blinded hops don't have an
+				// amount set.
+				AmtToForward: 0,
 			},
 			{
 				PubKeyBytes:  hops[4],
@@ -122,8 +126,10 @@ var (
 				AmtToForward: 99,
 			},
 			{
-				PubKeyBytes:   hops[2],
+				PubKeyBytes: hops[2],
-				AmtToForward:  95,
+				// Intermediate blinded hops don't have an
+				// amount set.
+				AmtToForward:  0,
 				BlindingPoint: genTestPubKey(),
 			},
 			{
@@ -140,13 +146,17 @@ var (
 		TotalAmount:  100,
 		Hops: []*route.Hop{
 			{
-				PubKeyBytes:   hops[1],
+				PubKeyBytes: hops[1],
-				AmtToForward:  90,
+				// Intermediate blinded hops don't have an
+				// amount set.
+				AmtToForward:  0,
 				BlindingPoint: genTestPubKey(),
 			},
 			{
-				PubKeyBytes:  hops[2],
+				PubKeyBytes: hops[2],
-				AmtToForward: 75,
+				// Intermediate blinded hops don't have an
+				// amount set.
+				AmtToForward: 0,
 			},
 			{
 				PubKeyBytes:  hops[3],
@@ -552,7 +562,12 @@ var resultTestCases = []resultTestCase{
 			pairResults: map[DirectedNodePair]pairResult{
 				getTestPair(0, 1): successPairResult(100),
 				getTestPair(1, 2): successPairResult(99),
-				getTestPair(3, 4): failPairResult(88),
+
+				// The amount for the last hop is always the
+				// receiver amount because the amount to forward
+				// is always set to 0 for intermediate blinded
+				// hops.
+				getTestPair(3, 4): failPairResult(77),
 			},
 		},
 	},
@@ -567,7 +582,12 @@ var resultTestCases = []resultTestCase{
 		expectedResult: &interpretedResult{
 			pairResults: map[DirectedNodePair]pairResult{
 				getTestPair(0, 1): successPairResult(100),
-				getTestPair(2, 3): failPairResult(75),
+
+				// The amount for the last hop is always the
+				// receiver amount because the amount to forward
+				// is always set to 0 for intermediate blinded
+				// hops.
+				getTestPair(2, 3): failPairResult(58),
 			},
 		},
 	},
@@ -682,6 +702,25 @@ var resultTestCases = []resultTestCase{
 			finalFailureReason: &reasonError,
 		},
 	},
+	// Test a multi-hop blinded route and that in a success case the amounts
+	// for the blinded route part are correctly set to the receiver amount.
+	{
+		name:    "blinded multi-hop success",
+		route:   blindedMultiToIntroduction,
+		success: true,
+		expectedResult: &interpretedResult{
+			pairResults: map[DirectedNodePair]pairResult{
+				getTestPair(0, 1): successPairResult(100),
+
+				// For the route blinded part of the route the
+				// success amount is determined by the receiver
+				// amount because the intermediate blinded hops
+				// set the forwarded amount to 0.
+				getTestPair(1, 2): successPairResult(58),
+				getTestPair(2, 3): successPairResult(58),
+			},
+		},
+	},
 }
 
 // TestResultInterpretation executes a list of test cases that test the result