Files
J ccdca59ef9 docs(views): correct backfill wording in AttributionBadge (nit MUL-4768)
Review nit: describing backfill as "confident / same waterfall resolved"
overstated the backend contract, which defines backfill as a historical,
non-realtime, non-compliance-grade source. Reword the docblock, the tone
rationale, and the test note to the accurate framing: backfill does not mean the
displayed name is wrong (so no warning tone), but its historical origin is still
preserved in the tooltip and the raw source field. Comments only; no behavior
change.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>
2026-07-15 04:02:01 +08:00
..