mirror of
https://github.com/multica-ai/multica.git
synced 2026-07-27 13:06:20 +02:00
Self-hosted upgrades to v0.4.3 failed closed on migration 198's VALIDATE of the strict attribution constraint, because the legacy rows migration 190 exempted were only backfilled out-of-band on cloud. Registers a pre-198 preMigrationHook that idempotently mirrors originator_user_id into accountable_user_id in batches before VALIDATE, with FOR UPDATE + repeated predicate to avoid clobbering concurrently-written rows, so a stuck-at-197 instance auto-heals on migrate up with no manual SQL. Originator-NULL rows are left untouched. Verified with unit + concurrency + end-to-end tests against real Postgres. Fixes #5544
365 lines
14 KiB
Go
365 lines
14 KiB
Go
package attributionbackfill
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"math/rand/v2"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/pgxpool"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// These tests exercise the migration-198 backfill hook against a live
|
|
// Postgres. They connect to DATABASE_URL (default
|
|
// postgres://multica:multica@localhost:5432/multica?sslmode=disable),
|
|
// matching every other live-Postgres suite in the repo, and skip cleanly
|
|
// when no database is reachable so CI without a DB sees SKIP, not failure.
|
|
//
|
|
// Each test isolates itself in a throwaway schema so it never touches the
|
|
// real agent_task_queue, and drops the schema on cleanup.
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
// The exact strict constraint installed by migration 197, applied to
|
|
// the fixture table so we can prove VALIDATE passes only after the hook
|
|
// reconciles the violating rows.
|
|
strictCheck = `originator_user_id IS NULL
|
|
OR (accountable_user_id IS NOT NULL AND accountable_user_id = originator_user_id)`
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func newTestPool(t *testing.T) *pgxpool.Pool {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
dbURL := os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL")
|
|
if dbURL == "" {
|
|
dbURL = "postgres://multica:multica@localhost:5432/multica?sslmode=disable"
|
|
}
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
pool, err := pgxpool.New(ctx, dbURL)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Skipf("could not connect to %s: %v", dbURL, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := pool.Ping(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
pool.Close()
|
|
t.Skipf("database not reachable at %s: %v", dbURL, err)
|
|
}
|
|
return pool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// newFixture creates a throwaway schema with a minimal agent_task_queue-like
|
|
// table carrying only the attribution columns. It returns the
|
|
// schema-qualified, quoted table identifier for HookOptions.Table.
|
|
//
|
|
// The strict constraint is deliberately NOT added here: callers seed their
|
|
// (possibly violating) rows first, then call addStrictConstraint, exactly
|
|
// mirroring the real upgrade order where legacy rows predate migration 197.
|
|
// A NOT VALID CHECK still rejects new INSERTs, so a violating row can only
|
|
// exist if it was written before the constraint was added.
|
|
func newFixture(t *testing.T, pool *pgxpool.Pool) string {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
schema := fmt.Sprintf("attr_backfill_test_%d_%d", time.Now().UnixNano(), rand.IntN(1_000_000))
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(`CREATE SCHEMA %q`, schema)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("create schema: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() {
|
|
_, _ = pool.Exec(context.Background(), fmt.Sprintf(`DROP SCHEMA %q CASCADE`, schema))
|
|
})
|
|
table := fmt.Sprintf("%q.agent_task_queue", schema)
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(`
|
|
CREATE TABLE %s (
|
|
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
|
|
originator_user_id UUID NULL,
|
|
accountable_user_id UUID NULL,
|
|
originator_source TEXT NULL
|
|
)`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("create fixture table: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
return table
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// addStrictConstraint installs migration 197's strict CHECK as NOT VALID,
|
|
// which does not scan existing rows — matching the real migration.
|
|
func addStrictConstraint(t *testing.T, pool *pgxpool.Pool, table string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(context.Background(), fmt.Sprintf(`
|
|
ALTER TABLE %s
|
|
ADD CONSTRAINT agent_task_queue_accountable_matches_originator_strict
|
|
CHECK (%s) NOT VALID`, table, strictCheck)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("add strict constraint: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHook_ReconcilesViolatingRowsSoValidatePasses(t *testing.T) {
|
|
pool := newTestPool(t)
|
|
defer pool.Close()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
table := newFixture(t, pool)
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
u1 = "11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111" // legacy: originator set, accountable NULL, source NULL
|
|
u2 = "22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222" // rolling-deploy: same shape
|
|
u3 = "33333333-3333-3333-3333-333333333333" // already-good: accountable == originator, precise source
|
|
u4 = "44444444-4444-4444-4444-444444444444" // mismatch originator
|
|
u5 = "55555555-5555-5555-5555-555555555555" // mismatch accountable
|
|
u6 = "66666666-6666-6666-6666-666666666666" // legit divergent: originator NULL, accountable set
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// id, originator, accountable, source
|
|
rows := [][4]any{
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000001", u1, nil, nil}, // -> backfill to u1, source 'backfill'
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000002", u2, nil, nil}, // -> backfill to u2, source 'backfill'
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000003", u3, u3, "direct_human"}, // untouched
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000004", u4, u5, "direct_human"}, // mismatch -> accountable u4, source kept
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000005", nil, u6, "rule_owner"}, // legit divergent, untouched
|
|
{"aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000006", nil, nil, "unattributed"}, // orphan, untouched
|
|
}
|
|
for _, r := range rows {
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx,
|
|
fmt.Sprintf(`INSERT INTO %s (id, originator_user_id, accountable_user_id, originator_source) VALUES ($1,$2,$3,$4)`, table),
|
|
r[0], r[1], r[2], r[3]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("insert fixture row %v: %v", r[0], err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
addStrictConstraint(t, pool, table)
|
|
|
|
res, err := Hook(ctx, pool, HookOptions{Table: table})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Hook: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
// u1, u2 (NULL accountable) + the mismatch row = 3 reconciled.
|
|
if res.RowsBackfilled != 3 {
|
|
t.Errorf("RowsBackfilled = %d, want 3", res.RowsBackfilled)
|
|
}
|
|
if res.MismatchNormalized != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("MismatchNormalized = %d, want 1", res.MismatchNormalized)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The whole point: VALIDATE now succeeds.
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`ALTER TABLE %s VALIDATE CONSTRAINT agent_task_queue_accountable_matches_originator_strict`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("VALIDATE after hook should pass, got: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assertRow := func(id, wantAccountable, wantSource string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
var acc, src *string
|
|
if err := pool.QueryRow(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`SELECT accountable_user_id::text, originator_source FROM %s WHERE id=$1`, table), id).Scan(&acc, &src); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("read row %s: %v", id, err)
|
|
}
|
|
gotAcc, gotSrc := "<nil>", "<nil>"
|
|
if acc != nil {
|
|
gotAcc = *acc
|
|
}
|
|
if src != nil {
|
|
gotSrc = *src
|
|
}
|
|
if gotAcc != wantAccountable || gotSrc != wantSource {
|
|
t.Errorf("row %s = (accountable %s, source %s), want (%s, %s)", id, gotAcc, gotSrc, wantAccountable, wantSource)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000001", u1, "backfill") // legacy filled, source stamped
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000002", u2, "backfill") // rolling filled, source stamped
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000003", u3, "direct_human") // untouched
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000004", u4, "direct_human") // normalized to originator, source preserved
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000005", u6, "rule_owner") // legit divergent untouched
|
|
assertRow("aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-000000000006", "<nil>", "unattributed")
|
|
|
|
// Idempotent: a second run reconciles nothing.
|
|
res2, err := Hook(ctx, pool, HookOptions{Table: table})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("second Hook: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if res2.RowsBackfilled != 0 || res2.Batches != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("second run not a no-op: %+v", res2)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHook_EmptyTableIsNoOp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
pool := newTestPool(t)
|
|
defer pool.Close()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
table := newFixture(t, pool)
|
|
addStrictConstraint(t, pool, table)
|
|
|
|
res, err := Hook(ctx, pool, HookOptions{Table: table})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Hook on empty table: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if res.RowsBackfilled != 0 || res.MismatchNormalized != 0 || res.Batches != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("empty-table run should be a no-op, got %+v", res)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`ALTER TABLE %s VALIDATE CONSTRAINT agent_task_queue_accountable_matches_originator_strict`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("VALIDATE on empty table should pass, got: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestHook_ConcurrentForkNotClobbered reproduces the stale-selection race: a
|
|
// row is selected as violating, but a concurrent writer flips it to a
|
|
// legitimate originator-NULL fork (originator NULL, accountable set) while the
|
|
// hook is mid-flight. The FOR UPDATE lock + repeated outer predicate must make
|
|
// the hook skip that row rather than overwrite the writer's accountable value
|
|
// with NULL, while still reconciling the untouched violating rows.
|
|
func TestHook_ConcurrentForkNotClobbered(t *testing.T) {
|
|
pool := newTestPool(t)
|
|
defer pool.Close()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
table := newFixture(t, pool)
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
u1 = "11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111" // R: legacy originator, gets flipped by the writer
|
|
u2 = "22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222" // fork accountable the writer sets
|
|
u3 = "33333333-3333-3333-3333-333333333333" // R2: control violating row, must be backfilled
|
|
)
|
|
rID := "aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-0000000000f1"
|
|
r2ID := "aaaaaaaa-0000-0000-0000-0000000000f2"
|
|
for _, r := range [][2]any{{rID, u1}, {r2ID, u3}} {
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`INSERT INTO %s (id, originator_user_id, accountable_user_id, originator_source) VALUES ($1,$2,NULL,NULL)`, table),
|
|
r[0], r[1]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("seed row %v: %v", r[0], err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
addStrictConstraint(t, pool, table)
|
|
|
|
// Writer B: open a transaction that flips R to a legit originator-NULL fork
|
|
// and holds the row lock without committing yet.
|
|
writer, err := pool.Acquire(ctx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("acquire writer conn: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer writer.Release()
|
|
tx, err := writer.Begin(ctx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("begin writer tx: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, err := tx.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`UPDATE %s SET originator_user_id = NULL, accountable_user_id = $2, originator_source = 'rule_owner' WHERE id = $1`, table),
|
|
rID, u2); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("writer flip: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Run the hook concurrently; it will block trying to FOR UPDATE-lock R.
|
|
type hookResult struct {
|
|
res Result
|
|
err error
|
|
}
|
|
done := make(chan hookResult, 1)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
res, err := Hook(ctx, pool, HookOptions{Table: table})
|
|
done <- hookResult{res, err}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// Wait until the hook is actually blocked on a lock before committing the
|
|
// writer — this deterministically forces the "row changed under the
|
|
// selection" ordering rather than relying on a sleep.
|
|
waitUntilBlocked(t, pool, table)
|
|
|
|
if err := tx.Commit(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("commit writer: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hr := <-done
|
|
if hr.err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("hook: %v", hr.err)
|
|
}
|
|
// Only the control row R2 should have been reconciled; R was dropped.
|
|
if hr.res.RowsBackfilled != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("RowsBackfilled = %d, want 1 (R2 only; R must be skipped)", hr.res.RowsBackfilled)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// R keeps the writer's legit fork — NOT clobbered to (NULL, NULL).
|
|
var origR, accR, srcR *string
|
|
if err := pool.QueryRow(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`SELECT originator_user_id::text, accountable_user_id::text, originator_source FROM %s WHERE id=$1`, table), rID).
|
|
Scan(&origR, &accR, &srcR); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("read R: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if origR != nil || accR == nil || *accR != u2 || srcR == nil || *srcR != "rule_owner" {
|
|
t.Errorf("R was clobbered: originator=%v accountable=%v source=%v; want (NULL, %s, rule_owner)", deref(origR), deref(accR), deref(srcR), u2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// R2 was reconciled.
|
|
var accR2, srcR2 *string
|
|
if err := pool.QueryRow(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`SELECT accountable_user_id::text, originator_source FROM %s WHERE id=$1`, table), r2ID).Scan(&accR2, &srcR2); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("read R2: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if accR2 == nil || *accR2 != u3 || srcR2 == nil || *srcR2 != "backfill" {
|
|
t.Errorf("R2 not reconciled: accountable=%v source=%v; want (%s, backfill)", deref(accR2), deref(srcR2), u3)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// And the constraint validates.
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`ALTER TABLE %s VALIDATE CONSTRAINT agent_task_queue_accountable_matches_originator_strict`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("VALIDATE after concurrent run should pass, got: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func deref(s *string) string {
|
|
if s == nil {
|
|
return "<nil>"
|
|
}
|
|
return *s
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// waitUntilBlocked polls pg_stat_activity until at least one backend is blocked
|
|
// on a lock while running a statement against the fixture schema, so the test
|
|
// can commit the writer at exactly the racy moment. It fails if the hook never
|
|
// blocks within the timeout, which would itself signal the FOR UPDATE guard is
|
|
// missing.
|
|
func waitUntilBlocked(t *testing.T, pool *pgxpool.Pool, table string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
deadline := time.Now().Add(10 * time.Second)
|
|
for time.Now().Before(deadline) {
|
|
var n int
|
|
if err := pool.QueryRow(ctx, `
|
|
SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity
|
|
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Lock'
|
|
AND state = 'active'
|
|
AND query ILIKE '%' || $1 || '%'`, table).Scan(&n); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("poll pg_stat_activity: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if n > 0 {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
}
|
|
t.Fatal("hook never blocked on the row lock; FOR UPDATE guard likely missing")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHook_BatchingReconcilesAll(t *testing.T) {
|
|
pool := newTestPool(t)
|
|
defer pool.Close()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
table := newFixture(t, pool)
|
|
|
|
// Seed more violating rows than one batch so the loop must iterate.
|
|
const n = 25
|
|
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`INSERT INTO %s (originator_user_id, accountable_user_id, originator_source) VALUES (gen_random_uuid(), NULL, NULL)`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("seed row %d: %v", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
addStrictConstraint(t, pool, table)
|
|
|
|
res, err := Hook(ctx, pool, HookOptions{Table: table, BatchSize: 10})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Hook: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if res.RowsBackfilled != n {
|
|
t.Errorf("RowsBackfilled = %d, want %d", res.RowsBackfilled, n)
|
|
}
|
|
if res.Batches != 3 { // 10 + 10 + 5
|
|
t.Errorf("Batches = %d, want 3", res.Batches)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, err := pool.Exec(ctx, fmt.Sprintf(
|
|
`ALTER TABLE %s VALIDATE CONSTRAINT agent_task_queue_accountable_matches_originator_strict`, table)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("VALIDATE after batched backfill should pass, got: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|