Files
multica/packages
Jiayuan Zhang 0d51614c9c feat(editor): text highlight (==text==) in description & comments [MUL-2934] (#3661)
* feat(editor): support text highlight (==text==) in description & comments

Adds a single-color (yellow) text highlight mark to the shared rich-text
editor, round-tripped through stored Markdown as ==text==.

- HighlightExtension: @tiptap/extension-highlight + @tiptap/markdown hooks
  (markdownTokenizer/parseMarkdown/renderMarkdown) so ==text== <-> <mark>
  round-trips; inner inline formatting preserved via inlineTokens.
- Bubble menu: highlight toggle button (Mod-Shift-H), i18n in 4 locales.
- Read-only renderer: highlightToHtml lowers ==text== -> <mark> (skips code
  and math); rehype-sanitize schema whitelists <mark>. Nested Markdown inside
  a highlight still parses via the existing rehype-raw step.
- prose.css: single yellow <mark> style, legible in light/dark.

Pinned @tiptap/extension-highlight to exact 3.22.1 to match @tiptap/core
(>=3.23 expects a getStyleProperty export core 3.22.1 doesn't have).

Web/desktop only. Mobile (native md4c, no == syntax, no custom renderers)
is tracked as a follow-up. MUL-2934.

Tests: editor round-trip (cross-process serialization protocol), readonly
<mark> rendering + sanitize, and the ==->mark transform incl. code-skip.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

* fix(editor): align highlight boundary rules across editor & readonly

Addresses two boundary bugs from review (PR #3661):

1. A == inside inline code/math could close a highlight when the opening
   == was outside the literal span (e.g. ==a `b==c` d== wrongly became
   <mark>a `b</mark>c` d==). Both the editor tokenizer's lazy regex and the
   readonly transform only guarded the opening fence, not the closing one.
2. The readonly transform matched across blank lines (==a\n\nb==) while the
   editor lexes those as two literal paragraphs — a storage↔editor↔readonly
   mismatch.

Fix: extract one shared matcher (utils/highlight-match.ts) used by BOTH the
editor tokenizer and the readonly lowering, so the rules can't drift. It skips
fences that fall inside code/math literal ranges (open or close) and caps the
inner span at the first blank line.

Tests: shared-matcher unit tests + both repros covered on the editor
(round-trip/HTML) and readonly (transform + rendered DOM) sides.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

* fix(editor): handle CRLF in highlight blank-line boundary

BLANK_LINE_RE only matched LF, so a CRLF blank line (==a\r\n\r\nb==) was not
recognized as a block boundary and got highlighted. Widen to \r?\n[ \t]*\r?\n.

Tests: CRLF blank-line (no highlight) + CRLF soft-break (still highlights) on
the matcher, readonly transform, and editor sides.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

---------

Co-authored-by: Lambda <lambda@multica.ai>
Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>
2026-06-02 17:24:55 +02:00
..