mirror of
https://github.com/multica-ai/multica.git
synced 2026-07-17 23:29:01 +02:00
f599333f97
* feat(daemon): route coalesced replies per root thread (MUL-4348) When a busy agent coalesces multiple @mentions into one run, the run used a single --parent (the newest trigger), so questions raised in separate root threads were answered in one merged comment while the other threads were left unanswered. Group the trigger + coalesced comments by root thread server-side in the prompt builder (commentReplyThreads). When the run spans >=2 distinct threads, emit a per-thread reply plan (BuildMultiThreadCommentReplyInstructions) that instructs one reply per thread with the exact --parent, explicitly overriding the general 'one comment per run' rule. Multiple @mentions from the SAME thread collapse to a single group upstream, so same-thread follow-ups keep the ordinary single --parent=trigger path and can never be split into duplicate replies. Single-thread / non-coalesced runs are unchanged. Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai> * fix(daemon): sync workflow-brief reply step with per-thread fan-out (MUL-4348) Review of #5202 found the cross-thread fan-out was injected only into the per-turn prompt (buildCommentPrompt), while the persistent workflow brief (writeWorkflowComment step 7) still emitted the single --parent=trigger cookbook for every comment task. A cross-thread run therefore got two slightly conflicting reply instructions, so the fan-out guarantee rested on prompt wording/precedence rather than structure. Carry the computed thread targets on TaskContextForEnv.CommentReplyTargets (populated from the same commentReplyThreads() the prompt uses, so the two surfaces cannot drift). When >=2 targets, the workflow reply step now emits the per-thread fan-out plan too; same-thread follow-ups collapse to a single group upstream and keep the single-parent cookbook, so they still can never be split. Also clarified the multi-thread cookbook to show a distinct file per reply (reply-1.md / reply-2.md). Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai> * fix(daemon): reply under the specific mentioning comment per thread (MUL-4348 review nit #1) Non-trigger threads previously replied under the thread root, while the trigger's thread replied under the trigger comment — asymmetric, and it put the answer at the top of the thread instead of next to the actual question when the mention was a mid-thread reply. Reply under the NEWEST triggering comment in each thread instead (inputs are chronological, so last-write-wins per thread), making every thread consistent and nesting each answer beside its question. Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai> --------- Co-authored-by: Eve <eve@multica-ai.local> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>