highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-11-11 22:50:59 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #16702: p2p: supplying and using asmap to improve IP bucketing in addrman

Browse Source 
3c1bc40205 Add extra logging of asmap use and bucketing (Gleb Naumenko)
e4658aa8ea Return mapped AS in RPC call getpeerinfo (Gleb Naumenko)
ec45646de9 Integrate ASN bucketing in Addrman and add tests (Gleb Naumenko)
8feb4e4b66  Add asmap utility which queries a mapping (Gleb Naumenko)

Pull request description:

  This PR attempts to solve the problem explained in #16599.
  A particular attack which encouraged us to work on this issue is explained here  [[Erebus Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer Network](https://erebus-attack.comp.nus.edu.sg/)] (by @muoitranduc)

  Instead of relying on /16 prefix to diversify the connections every node creates, we would instead rely on the (ip -> ASN) mapping, if this mapping is provided.

  A .map file can be created by every user independently based on a router dump, or provided along with the Bitcoin release. Currently we use the python scripts written by @sipa to create a .map file, which is no larger than 2MB (awesome!).

  Here I suggest adding a field to peers.dat which would represent a hash of asmap file used while serializing addrman (or 0 for /16 prefix legacy approach).
  In this case, every time the file is updated (or grouping method changed), all buckets will be re-computed.
  I believe that alternative selective re-bucketing for only updated ranges would require substantial changes.

  TODO:
  - ~~more unit tests~~
  - ~~find a way to test the code without including >1 MB mapping file in the repo.~~
  - find a way to check that mapping file is not corrupted (checksum?)
  - comments and separate tests for asmap.cpp
  - make python code for .map generation public
  - figure out asmap distribution (?)

  ~Interesting corner case: I’m using std::hash to compute a fingerprint of asmap, and std::hash returns size_t. I guess  if a user updates the OS to 64-bit, then the hash of asap will change? Does it even matter?~

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    re-ACK 3c1bc40205
  jamesob:
    ACK 3c1bc40205 ([`jamesob/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using))
  jonatack:
    ACK 3c1bc40205

Tree-SHA512: e2dc6171188d5cdc2ab2c022fa49ed73a14a0acb8ae4c5ffa970172a0365942a249ad3d57e5fb134bc156a3492662c983f74bd21e78d316629dcadf71576800c
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2020-01-29 13:53:46 +01:00
parent c434282d2c 3c1bc40205
commit 01fc5891fb
15 changed files with 641 additions and 103 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
src/test/netbase_tests.cpp
View File

@@ -286,23 +286,23 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(subnet_test)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netbase_getgroup)
{
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("127.0.0.1").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // Local -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("257.0.0.1").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // !Valid -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("10.0.0.1").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // RFC1918 -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("169.254.1.1").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // RFC3927 -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("1.2.3.4").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // IPv4
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("::FFFF:0:102:304").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC6145
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("64:FF9B::102:304").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC6052
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2002:102:304:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC3964
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:0:9999:9999:9999:9999:FEFD:FCFB").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC4380
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("FD87:D87E:EB43:edb1:8e4:3588:e546:35ca").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_ONION, 239})); // Tor
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:470:abcd:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV6, 32, 1, 4, 112, 175})); //he.net
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:2001:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup() == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV6, 32, 1, 32, 1})); //IPv6
std::vector<bool> asmap; // use /16
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("127.0.0.1").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // Local -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("257.0.0.1").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // !Valid -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("10.0.0.1").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // RFC1918 -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("169.254.1.1").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({0})); // RFC3927 -> !Routable()
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("1.2.3.4").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // IPv4
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("::FFFF:0:102:304").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC6145
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("64:FF9B::102:304").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC6052
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2002:102:304:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC3964
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:0:9999:9999:9999:9999:FEFD:FCFB").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV4, 1, 2})); // RFC4380
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("FD87:D87E:EB43:edb1:8e4:3588:e546:35ca").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_ONION, 239})); // Tor
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:470:abcd:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV6, 32, 1, 4, 112, 175})); //he.net
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:2001:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999:9999").GetGroup(asmap) == std::vector<unsigned char>({(unsigned char)NET_IPV6, 32, 1, 32, 1})); //IPv6
// baz.net sha256 hash: 12929400eb4607c4ac075f087167e75286b179c693eb059a01774b864e8fe505
std::vector<unsigned char> internal_group = {NET_INTERNAL, 0x12, 0x92, 0x94, 0x00, 0xeb, 0x46, 0x07, 0xc4, 0xac, 0x07};
BOOST_CHECK(CreateInternal("baz.net").GetGroup() == internal_group);
BOOST_CHECK(CreateInternal("baz.net").GetGroup(asmap) == internal_group);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netbase_parsenetwork)