Merge #10498: Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types

9ad6746ccd Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  A C-style cast is equivalent to try casting in the following order:

  1. `const_cast(...)`
  2. `static_cast(...)`
  3. `const_cast(static_cast(...))`
  4. `reinterpret_cast(...)`
  5. `const_cast(reinterpret_cast(...))`

  By using `static_cast<T>(...)` explicitly we avoid the possibility of an unintentional and dangerous `reinterpret_cast`. Furthermore `static_cast<T>(...)` allows for easier grepping of casts.

  For a more thorough discussion, see ["ES.49: If you must use a cast, use a named cast"](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es49-if-you-must-use-a-cast-use-a-named-cast) in the C++ Core Guidelines (Stroustrup & Sutter).

Tree-SHA512: bd6349b7ea157da93a47b8cf238932af5dff84731374ccfd69b9f732fabdad1f9b1cdfca67497040f14eaa85346391404f4c0495e22c467f26ca883cd2de4d3c

src/protocol.h

@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ public:
             READWRITE(nTime);
         uint64_t nServicesInt = nServices;
         READWRITE(nServicesInt);
-        nServices = (ServiceFlags)nServicesInt;
-        READWRITE(*(CService*)this);
+        nServices = static_cast<ServiceFlags>(nServicesInt);
+        READWRITE(*static_cast<CService*>(this));
     }
 
     // TODO: make private (improves encapsulation)