scripted-diff: test: Use existing chainman in unit tests

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git ls-files -- src/test \
    | grep -v '^src/test/fuzz' \
    | xargs sed -i -E \
            -e 's@g_chainman\.m_blockman@m_node.chainman->m_blockman@g' \
            -e 's@([^:])(Chain(state|)Active)@\1::\2@g' \
            -e 's@::Chain(state|)Active\(\)@m_node.chainman->ActiveChain\1()@g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This commit is contained in:
Carl Dong
2020-09-09 16:15:15 -04:00
parent e197076219
commit 0d61634c06
10 changed files with 93 additions and 93 deletions

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
const auto ToMemPool = [this](const CMutableTransaction& tx) {
LOCK(cs_main);
const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(::ChainstateActive(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(tx),
const MempoolAcceptResult result = AcceptToMemoryPool(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool, MakeTransactionRef(tx),
true /* bypass_limits */);
return result.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID;
};
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
// Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
m_node.mempool->clear();
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
m_node.mempool->clear();
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(oneSpend, scriptPubKey);
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
}
// spends[1] should have been removed from the mempool when the
// block with spends[0] is accepted:
@@ -205,20 +205,20 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData ptd_spend_tx;
BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr));
BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, nullptr));
// If we call again asking for scriptchecks (as happens in
// ConnectBlock), we should add a script check object for this -- we're
// not caching invalidity (if that changes, delete this test case).
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(spend_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG, true, true, ptd_spend_tx, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 1U);
// Test that CheckInputScripts returns true iff DERSIG-enforcing flags are
// not present. Don't add these checks to the cache, so that we can
// test later that block validation works fine in the absence of cached
// successes.
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(spend_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(spend_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
// And if we produce a block with this tx, it should be valid (DERSIG not
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
block = CreateAndProcessBlock({spend_tx}, p2pk_scriptPubKey);
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip().GetBestBlock() == block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip().GetBestBlock() == block.GetHash());
// Test P2SH: construct a transaction that is valid without P2SH, and
// then test validity with P2SH.
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig2(p2pk_scriptPubKey.begin(), p2pk_scriptPubKey.end());
invalid_under_p2sh_tx.vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig2;
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_under_p2sh_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_under_p2sh_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
// Test CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Make it valid, and check again
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), state, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_cltv_tx), state, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
}
// TEST CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
@@ -295,13 +295,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Make it valid, and check again
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(invalid_with_csv_tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
}
// TODO: add tests for remaining script flags
@@ -324,11 +324,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
UpdateInput(valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0], sigdata);
// This should be valid under all script flags.
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), 0, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), 0, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Remove the witness, and check that it is now invalid.
valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0].scriptWitness.SetNull();
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx), SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
}
{
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
}
// This should be valid under all script flags
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(tx), 0, true, ::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CTransaction(tx), 0, true, m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip());
// Check that if the second input is invalid, but the first input is
// valid, the transaction is not cached.
@@ -363,12 +363,12 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
TxValidationState state;
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata;
// This transaction is now invalid under segwit, because of the second input.
BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
BOOST_CHECK(!CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, nullptr));
std::vector<CScriptCheck> scriptchecks;
// Make sure this transaction was not cached (ie because the first
// input was valid)
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks));
BOOST_CHECK(CheckInputScripts(CTransaction(tx), state, &m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate().CoinsTip(), SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, true, txdata, &scriptchecks));
// Should get 2 script checks back -- caching is on a whole-transaction basis.
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(scriptchecks.size(), 2U);
}