rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock

It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
This commit is contained in:
Antoine Poinsot
2022-07-07 14:06:27 +02:00
parent 55f98d087e
commit 0fd2d14454
5 changed files with 37 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.double_spends_filtered()
self.test_targetconfirmations()
self.test_desc()
self.test_send_to_self()
def test_no_blockhash(self):
self.log.info("Test no blockhash")
@ -423,6 +424,27 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
coin_b = next(c for c in coins if c["amount"] == 2)
assert_equal(coin_b["parent_descs"][0], multi_b)
def test_send_to_self(self):
"""We can make listsinceblock output our change outputs."""
self.log.info("Test the inclusion of change outputs in the output.")
# Create a UTxO paying to one of our change addresses.
block_hash = self.nodes[2].getbestblockhash()
addr = self.nodes[2].getrawchangeaddress()
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(addr, 1)
# If we don't list change, we won't have an entry for it.
coins = self.nodes[2].listsinceblock(blockhash=block_hash)["transactions"]
assert not any(c["address"] == addr for c in coins)
# Now if we list change, we'll get both the send (to a change address) and
# the actual change.
res = self.nodes[2].listsinceblock(blockhash=block_hash, include_change=True)
coins = [entry for entry in res["transactions"] if entry["category"] == "receive"]
assert_equal(len(coins), 2)
assert any(c["address"] == addr for c in coins)
assert all(self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(c["address"])["ischange"] for c in coins)
if __name__ == '__main__':
ListSinceBlockTest().main()