mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-04-15 01:58:09 +02:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32638: blocks: force hash validations on disk read
9341b5333ablockstorage: make block read hash checks explicit (Lőrinc)2371b9f4eetest/bench: verify hash in `ComputeFilter` reads (Lőrinc)5d235d50d6net: assert block hash in `ProcessGetBlockData` and `ProcessMessage` (Lőrinc) Pull request description: A follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32487#discussion_r2094072165, after which validating the hash of a read block from disk doesn't incur the cost of calculating its hash anymore. ### Summary This PR adds explicit checks that the read block header's hash matches the one we were expecting. ### Context After the previous PR, validating a block's hash during read operations became essentially free. This PR leverages that by requiring callers to provide a block's expected hash (or `std::nullopt`), preventing silent failures caused by corrupted or mismatched data. Most `ReadBlock` usages were updated with expected hashes and now fail on mismatch. ### Changes * added hash assertions in `ProcessGetBlockData` and `ProcessMessage` to validate that the block read from disk matches the expected hash; * updated tests and benchmark to pass the correct block hash to `ReadBlock()`, ensuring the hash validation is tested - or none if we already expect PoW failure; * removed the default value for `expected_hash`, requiring an explicit hash for all block reads. ### Why is the hash still optional (but no longer has a default value) * for header-error tests, where the goal is to trigger failures early in the parsing process; * for out-of-order orphan blocks, where the child hash isn't available before the initial disk read. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: review ACK9341b5333a🕙 achow101: ACK9341b5333ahodlinator: ACK9341b5333ajanb84: re ACK9341b5333aTree-SHA512: cf1d4fff4c15e3f8898ec284929cb83d7e747125d4ee759e77d369f1716728e843ef98030be32c8d608956a96ae2fbefa0e801200c333b9eefd6c086ec032e1f
This commit is contained in:
@@ -190,12 +190,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(blockmanager_flush_block_file)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(read_block.nVersion, 0);
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT_DEBUG_LOG("Errors in block header");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos1, {}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(read_block.nVersion, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT_DEBUG_LOG("Errors in block header");
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos2));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos2, {}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(read_block.nVersion, 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(blockmanager_flush_block_file)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(blockman.CalculateCurrentUsage(), (TEST_BLOCK_SIZE + STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES) * 2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Block 2 was not overwritten:
|
||||
blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!blockman.ReadBlock(read_block, pos2, {}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(read_block.nVersion, 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ bool ComputeFilter(BlockFilterType filter_type, const CBlockIndex& block_index,
|
||||
LOCK(::cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
CBlock block;
|
||||
if (!blockman.ReadBlock(block, block_index.GetBlockPos())) {
|
||||
if (!blockman.ReadBlock(block, block_index)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user