highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-07-12 22:02:28 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #13424: Consistently validate txid / blockhash length and encoding in rpc calls

Browse Source 
5eb20f81d9 Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
  an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
  these alternative calls.

  Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
  IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
  "must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
  "must be hexadecimal string (not X)" in that case.

  Split from #13420

Tree-SHA512: f0786b41c0d7793ff76e4b2bb35547873070bbf7561d510029e8edb93f59176277efcd4d183b3185532ea69fc0bbbf3dbe9e19362e8017007ae9d51266cd78ae
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2018-09-24 14:54:10 -04:00
parent 985d28cc90 5eb20f81d9
commit 37612099ec
14 changed files with 58 additions and 59 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
View File

@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest (BitcoinTestFramework):
"42759cde25462784395a337460bde75f58e73d3f08bd31fdc3507cbac856a2c4")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be of length 64 (not 11, for 'invalid-hex')", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
"invalid-hex")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be hexadecimal string (not 'Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
"Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
def test_reorg(self):
'''