Merge #12118: Sort mempool by min(feerate, ancestor_feerate)

0a22a52 Use mempool's ancestor sort in transaction selection (Suhas Daftuar)
7abfa53 Add test for new ancestor feerate sort behavior (Suhas Daftuar)
9a51319 Sort mempool by min(feerate, ancestor_feerate) (Suhas Daftuar)
6773f92 Refactor CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore (Suhas Daftuar)

Pull request description:

  This more closely approximates the desirability of a given transaction for
  mining, and should result in less re-sorting when transactions get removed from
  the mempool after being mined.

  I measured this as approximately a 5% speedup in removeForBlock.

Tree-SHA512: ffa36b567c5dfe3e8908c545a459b6a5ec0de26e7dc81b1050dd235cac9046564b4409a3f8c5ba97bd8b30526e8fec8f78480a912e317979467f32305c3dd37b
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2018-01-15 15:36:25 +01:00
4 changed files with 71 additions and 37 deletions

View File

@@ -398,6 +398,23 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolAncestorIndexingTest)
sortedOrder.erase(sortedOrder.end()-2);
sortedOrder.insert(sortedOrder.begin(), tx7.GetHash().ToString());
CheckSort<ancestor_score>(pool, sortedOrder);
// High-fee parent, low-fee child
// tx7 -> tx8
CMutableTransaction tx8 = CMutableTransaction();
tx8.vin.resize(1);
tx8.vin[0].prevout = COutPoint(tx7.GetHash(), 0);
tx8.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_11;
tx8.vout.resize(1);
tx8.vout[0].scriptPubKey = CScript() << OP_11 << OP_EQUAL;
tx8.vout[0].nValue = 10*COIN;
// Check that we sort by min(feerate, ancestor_feerate):
// set the fee so that the ancestor feerate is above tx1/5,
// but the transaction's own feerate is lower
pool.addUnchecked(tx8.GetHash(), entry.Fee(5000LL).FromTx(tx8));
sortedOrder.insert(sortedOrder.end()-1, tx8.GetHash().ToString());
CheckSort<ancestor_score>(pool, sortedOrder);
}