script, test: fix python linter E275 errors with flake8 5.0.4

This commit is contained in:
Jon Atack
2022-10-04 15:18:42 +02:00
committed by jonatack
parent cb552c5f21
commit 459cb637ac
28 changed files with 93 additions and 93 deletions

View File

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ class ScanblocksTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.wait_until(lambda: all(i["synced"] for i in node.getindexinfo().values()))
out = node.scanblocks("start", [f"addr({addr_1})"])
assert(blockhash in out['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash in out['relevant_blocks']
assert_equal(height, out['to_height'])
assert_equal(0, out['from_height'])
@ -56,24 +56,24 @@ class ScanblocksTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# make sure the blockhash is not in the filter result if we set the start_height
# to the just mined block (unlikely to hit a false positive)
assert(blockhash not in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height_new)['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash not in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height_new)['relevant_blocks']
# make sure the blockhash is present when using the first mined block as start_height
assert(blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height)['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height)['relevant_blocks']
# also test the stop height
assert(blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height, height)['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], height, height)['relevant_blocks']
# use the stop_height to exclude the relevant block
assert(blockhash not in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], 0, height - 1)['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash not in node.scanblocks(
"start", [f"addr({addr_1})"], 0, height - 1)['relevant_blocks']
# make sure the blockhash is present when using the first mined block as start_height
assert(blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"pkh({parent_key}/*)", "range": [0, 100]}], height)['relevant_blocks'])
assert blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"pkh({parent_key}/*)", "range": [0, 100]}], height)['relevant_blocks']
# check that false-positives are included in the result now; note that
# finding a false-positive at runtime would take too long, hence we simply
@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ class ScanblocksTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
false_positive_hash = bip158_basic_element_hash(false_positive_spk, 1, genesis_blockhash)
assert_equal(genesis_coinbase_hash, false_positive_hash)
assert(genesis_blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"raw({genesis_coinbase_spk.hex()})"}], 0, 0)['relevant_blocks'])
assert(genesis_blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"raw({false_positive_spk.hex()})"}], 0, 0)['relevant_blocks'])
assert genesis_blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"raw({genesis_coinbase_spk.hex()})"}], 0, 0)['relevant_blocks']
assert genesis_blockhash in node.scanblocks(
"start", [{"desc": f"raw({false_positive_spk.hex()})"}], 0, 0)['relevant_blocks']
# TODO: after an "accurate" mode for scanblocks is implemented (e.g. PR #26325)
# check here that it filters out the false-positive