[policy] disallow transactions under min relay fee, even in packages

Avoid adding transactions below min relay feerate because, even if they
were bumped through CPFP when entering the mempool, we do not have a
DoS-resistant way of ensuring they always remain bumped.  In the future,
this rule can be relaxed (e.g. to allow packages to bump 0-fee
transactions) if we find a way to do so.
This commit is contained in:
glozow
2023-01-17 11:01:13 +00:00
parent c4554fe894
commit 563a2ee4f5
3 changed files with 49 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@@ -671,10 +671,13 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
const auto submit_cpfp_deprio = ProcessNewPackage(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool,
package_cpfp, /*test_accept=*/ false);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_state.IsInvalid(),
"Package validation unexpectedly succeeded: " << submit_cpfp_deprio.m_state.GetRejectReason());
BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_tx_results.empty());
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_TX);
BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_state.IsInvalid());
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_tx_results.find(tx_parent->GetWitnessHash())->second.m_state.GetResult(),
TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_tx_results.find(tx_child->GetWitnessHash())->second.m_state.GetResult(),
TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS);
BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_tx_results.find(tx_parent->GetWitnessHash())->second.m_state.GetRejectReason() == "min relay fee not met");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
const CFeeRate expected_feerate(0, GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child));
}
@@ -808,8 +811,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_rich_parent.m_state.IsInvalid(), "Package validation unexpectedly succeeded");
// The child would have been validated on its own and failed, then submitted as a "package" of 1.
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "package-fee-too-low");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_TX);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "transaction failed");
auto it_parent = submit_rich_parent.m_tx_results.find(tx_parent_rich->GetWitnessHash());
BOOST_CHECK(it_parent != submit_rich_parent.m_tx_results.end());
@@ -818,6 +821,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(it_parent->second.m_base_fees.value() == high_parent_fee,
strprintf("rich parent: expected fee %s, got %s", high_parent_fee, it_parent->second.m_base_fees.value()));
BOOST_CHECK(it_parent->second.m_effective_feerate == CFeeRate(high_parent_fee, GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent_rich)));
auto it_child = submit_rich_parent.m_tx_results.find(tx_child_poor->GetWitnessHash());
BOOST_CHECK(it_child != submit_rich_parent.m_tx_results.end());
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(it_child->second.m_result_type, MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::INVALID);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(it_child->second.m_state.GetResult(), TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY);
BOOST_CHECK(it_child->second.m_state.GetRejectReason() == "min relay fee not met");
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_parent_rich->GetHash())));