Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24804: Sanity assert GetAncestor() != nullptr where appropriate

308dd2e93e Sanity assert GetAncestor() != nullptr where appropriate (Adam Jonas)

Pull request description:

  Re-opening #17232. I have rebased the PR and addressed jonatack's nit suggestions.

  Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.

  In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.

  In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.

  Co-Authored-By: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
  Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK 308dd2e93e

Tree-SHA512: 5bfdaab1499607ae2c3cd3e2e9e8c37850bfd0e327e680f4e36c81f9c6d98a543af78ecfac1ab0e06325d264412615a04d52005875780c7db2a4d81bd2d2259a
This commit is contained in:
MacroFake
2022-05-06 11:46:10 +02:00
5 changed files with 39 additions and 28 deletions

View File

@@ -405,16 +405,18 @@ void MinerTestingSetup::TestBasicMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const C
BOOST_CHECK(CheckFinalTxAtTip(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip(), CTransaction{tx})); // Locktime passes
BOOST_CHECK(!TestSequenceLocks(CTransaction{tx})); // Sequence locks fail
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
const int SEQUENCE_LOCK_TIME = 512; // Sequence locks pass 512 seconds later
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; ++i)
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += SEQUENCE_LOCK_TIME; // Trick the MedianTimePast
{
CBlockIndex* active_chain_tip = m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip();
BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(active_chain_tip->nHeight + 1, active_chain_tip))); // Sequence locks pass 512 seconds later
BOOST_CHECK(SequenceLocks(CTransaction(tx), flags, prevheights, CreateBlockIndex(active_chain_tip->nHeight + 1, active_chain_tip)));
}
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime -= 512; //undo tricked MTP
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; ++i) {
CBlockIndex* ancestor{Assert(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i))};
ancestor->nTime -= SEQUENCE_LOCK_TIME; // undo tricked MTP
}
// absolute height locked
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[2]->GetHash();
@@ -459,9 +461,11 @@ void MinerTestingSetup::TestBasicMining(const CChainParams& chainparams, const C
// but relative locked txs will if inconsistently added to mempool.
// For now these will still generate a valid template until BIP68 soft fork
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pblocktemplate->block.vtx.size(), 3U);
// However if we advance height by 1 and time by 512, all of them should be mined
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; i++)
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i)->nTime += 512; //Trick the MedianTimePast
// However if we advance height by 1 and time by SEQUENCE_LOCK_TIME, all of them should be mined
for (int i = 0; i < CBlockIndex::nMedianTimeSpan; ++i) {
CBlockIndex* ancestor{Assert(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetAncestor(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight - i))};
ancestor->nTime += SEQUENCE_LOCK_TIME; // Trick the MedianTimePast
}
m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->nHeight++;
SetMockTime(m_node.chainman->ActiveChain().Tip()->GetMedianTimePast() + 1);