mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-11-12 23:18:14 +01:00
Merge #16624: wallet: encapsulate transactions state
442a87cc0aAdd a test wallet_reorgsrestore (Antoine Riard)40ede992d9Modify wallet tx status if has been reorged out (Antoine Riard)7e89994133Remove SyncTransaction for conflicted txn in CWallet::BlockConnected (Antoine Riard)a31be09bfdEncapsulate tx status in a Confirmation struct (Antoine Riard) Pull request description: While working on #15931, I've tried to rationalize tx state management to ease integration of block height tracking per-wallet tx. We currently rely on a combination of `hashBlock` and `nIndex` with magic value to determine tx confirmation, conflicted or abandoned state. It's hard to reason and error-prone. To solve that, we encapsulate these fields in a `TxConfirmation` struct and introduce a `TxState` member that we update accordingly at block connection/disconnection. Following jnewbery [recommendation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15931#discussion_r312576506), I've taken these changes in its own commit, and open a PR to get them first. It would ease review of aforementioned PR, but above all should ease fixing of long-term issues like : * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7315 (but maybe we should abandon abandontransaction or relieve it to only free outpoints not track the transaction as abandoned in itself, need its own discussion) * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8692 where we should cancel conflicted state of transactions chain smoothly * `MarkConflicted` in `LoadToWallet` is likely useless if we track conflicts rights at block connection Main changes of this PR to get right are tx update in `AddToWallet` and serialization/deserialization logic. ACKs for top commit: meshcollider: Light re-Code Review ACK442a87cc0aryanofsky: utACK442a87cc0a. Changes since last review are switching from `hasChain` to `LockChain` and removing chain lock in `WalletBatch::LoadWallet` that's redundant with the new lock still added in `CWallet::LoadWallet`, and fixing python test race condition. Tree-SHA512: 029209e006de0240436817204e69e548c5665e2b0721b214510e7aba7eba130a5eab441d3a1ad95bd6426114dd27390492c77bf4560a9610009b32cd0a1f72f7
This commit is contained in:
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ BASE_SCRIPTS = [
|
||||
'wallet_createwallet.py --usecli',
|
||||
'wallet_watchonly.py',
|
||||
'wallet_watchonly.py --usecli',
|
||||
'wallet_reorgsrestore.py',
|
||||
'interface_http.py',
|
||||
'interface_rpc.py',
|
||||
'rpc_psbt.py',
|
||||
|
||||
105
test/functional/wallet_reorgsrestore.py
Executable file
105
test/functional/wallet_reorgsrestore.py
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2019 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
||||
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
||||
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
||||
|
||||
"""Test tx status in case of reorgs while wallet being shutdown.
|
||||
|
||||
Wallet txn status rely on block connection/disconnection for its
|
||||
accuracy. In case of reorgs happening while wallet being shutdown
|
||||
block updates are not going to be received. At wallet loading, we
|
||||
check against chain if confirmed txn are still in chain and change
|
||||
their status if block in which they have been included has been
|
||||
disconnected.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from decimal import Decimal
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import shutil
|
||||
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.util import (
|
||||
assert_equal,
|
||||
connect_nodes,
|
||||
disconnect_nodes,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
class ReorgsRestoreTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
self.num_nodes = 3
|
||||
|
||||
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
|
||||
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
|
||||
|
||||
def run_test(self):
|
||||
# Send a tx from which to conflict outputs later
|
||||
txid_conflict_from = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
||||
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks()
|
||||
|
||||
# Disconnect node1 from others to reorg its chain later
|
||||
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
||||
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 2)
|
||||
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
# Send a tx to be unconfirmed later
|
||||
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
||||
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
|
||||
self.nodes[0].generate(4)
|
||||
tx_before_reorg = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
|
||||
assert_equal(tx_before_reorg["confirmations"], 4)
|
||||
|
||||
# Disconnect node0 from node2 to broadcast a conflict on their respective chains
|
||||
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
||||
nA = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid_conflict_from)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
||||
inputs = []
|
||||
inputs.append({"txid": txid_conflict_from, "vout": nA})
|
||||
outputs_1 = {}
|
||||
outputs_2 = {}
|
||||
|
||||
# Create a conflicted tx broadcast on node0 chain and conflicting tx broadcast on node1 chain. Both spend from txid_conflict_from
|
||||
outputs_1[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.99998")
|
||||
outputs_2[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.99998")
|
||||
conflicted = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs_1))
|
||||
conflicting = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs_2))
|
||||
|
||||
conflicted_txid = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(conflicted["hex"])
|
||||
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
||||
conflicting_txid = self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(conflicting["hex"])
|
||||
self.nodes[2].generate(9)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reconnect node0 and node2 and check that conflicted_txid is effectively conflicted
|
||||
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[2]])
|
||||
conflicted = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(conflicted_txid)
|
||||
conflicting = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(conflicting_txid)
|
||||
assert_equal(conflicted["confirmations"], -9)
|
||||
assert_equal(conflicted["walletconflicts"][0], conflicting["txid"])
|
||||
|
||||
# Node0 wallet is shutdown
|
||||
self.stop_node(0)
|
||||
self.start_node(0)
|
||||
|
||||
# The block chain re-orgs and the tx is included in a different block
|
||||
self.nodes[1].generate(9)
|
||||
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(tx["hex"])
|
||||
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
||||
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(conflicted["hex"])
|
||||
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
||||
|
||||
# Node0 wallet file is loaded on longest sync'ed node1
|
||||
self.stop_node(1)
|
||||
self.nodes[0].backupwallet(os.path.join(self.nodes[0].datadir, 'wallet.bak'))
|
||||
shutil.copyfile(os.path.join(self.nodes[0].datadir, 'wallet.bak'), os.path.join(self.nodes[1].datadir, 'regtest', 'wallet.dat'))
|
||||
self.start_node(1)
|
||||
tx_after_reorg = self.nodes[1].gettransaction(txid)
|
||||
# Check that normal confirmed tx is confirmed again but with different blockhash
|
||||
assert_equal(tx_after_reorg["confirmations"], 2)
|
||||
assert(tx_before_reorg["blockhash"] != tx_after_reorg["blockhash"])
|
||||
conflicted_after_reorg = self.nodes[1].gettransaction(conflicted_txid)
|
||||
# Check that conflicted tx is confirmed again with blockhash different than previously conflicting tx
|
||||
assert_equal(conflicted_after_reorg["confirmations"], 1)
|
||||
assert(conflicting["blockhash"] != conflicted_after_reorg["blockhash"])
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
ReorgsRestoreTest().main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user