mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-06-30 10:42:23 +02:00
Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than these alternative calls. Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like: "must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than "must be hexadecimal string (not X)"
This commit is contained in:
@ -62,12 +62,18 @@ class MerkleBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
txid_spent = txin_spent["txid"]
|
||||
txid_unspent = txid1 if txin_spent["txid"] != txid1 else txid2
|
||||
|
||||
# Invalid txids
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be of length 64 (not 32, for '00000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, ["00000000000000000000000000000000"], blockhash)
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, ["ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"], blockhash)
|
||||
# Invalid blockhashes
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be of length 64 (not 32, for '00000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent], "00000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent], "ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
# We can't find the block from a fully-spent tx
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Transaction not yet in block", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent])
|
||||
# We can get the proof if we specify the block
|
||||
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid_spent], blockhash)), [txid_spent])
|
||||
# We can't get the proof if we specify a non-existent block
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent], "00000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent], "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
# We can get the proof if the transaction is unspent
|
||||
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid_unspent])), [txid_unspent])
|
||||
# We can get the proof if we provide a list of transactions and one of them is unspent. The ordering of the list should not matter.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user