highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-08-03 17:22:36 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc

Browse Source 
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.

Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)"
This commit is contained in:
Ben Woosley
2018-06-08 11:16:07 -07:00
parent 56f69360dc
commit 5eb20f81d9
14 changed files with 58 additions and 59 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
test/functional/wallet_basic.py
View File

@@ -122,9 +122,15 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal([unspent_0], self.nodes[2].listlockunspent())
self.nodes[2].lockunspent(True, [unspent_0])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[2].listlockunspent()), 0)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, unknown transaction",
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be of length 64 (not 34, for '0000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "txid must be hexadecimal string (not 'ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "ZZZ0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, unknown transaction",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "vout": 0}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter, vout index out of bounds",
self.nodes[2].lockunspent, False,
[{"txid": unspent_0["txid"], "vout": 999}])