Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29013: test: doc: follow-up #28368

b1318dcc56 test: change `m_submitted_in_package` input to fuzz data provider boolean (ismaelsadeeq)
5615e16b70 tx fees: update `m_from_disconnected_block` to `m_mempool_limit_bypassed` (ismaelsadeeq)
fcd4296648 doc: fix typo and update incorrect comment (ismaelsadeeq)
562664d263 test: wait for fee estimator to catch up before estimating fees (ismaelsadeeq)

Pull request description:

  This is a simple PR that does two things
  1.   Fixes #29000 by waiting for the fee estimator to catch up after `removeForBlock` calls before calling `estimateFee` in the `BlockPolicyEstimates` unit test.

  2. Addressed some outstanding review comments from #28368
  - Updated `NewMempoolTransactionInfo::m_from_disconnected_block` to `NewMempoolTransactionInfo::m_mempool_limit_bypassed` which now correctly indicates what the boolean does.
  - Changed  input of `processTransaction`'s tx_info  `m_submitted_in_package` input from false to fuzz data provider boolean.
  - Fixed some typos, and update incorrect comment

ACKs for top commit:
  martinus:
    re-ACK b1318dcc56
  glozow:
    utACK b1318dcc56

Tree-SHA512: 45268729bc044da4748fe004524e0df696d2ec92c5bd053db9aad6e15675f3838429b2a7b9061a6b694be4dc319d1782a876b44df506ddd439d62ad07252d0e1

src/init.cpp

@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ void Shutdown(NodeContext& node)
         DumpMempool(*node.mempool, MempoolPath(*node.args));
     }
 
-    // Drop transactions we were still watching, record fee estimations and Unregister
+    // Drop transactions we were still watching, record fee estimations and unregister
     // fee estimator from validation interface.
     if (node.fee_estimator) {
         node.fee_estimator->Flush();