Merge #21567: docs: fix various misleading comments

4eca20d6f7 [doc] correct comment about ATMPW (glozow)
8fa74aeb5b [doc] correct comment in chainparams (glozow)
2f8272c2a4 [doc] GetBestBlock() doesn't do nothing (gzhao408)

Pull request description:

  Came across a few misleading comments, wanted to fix them

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK 4eca20d6f7
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 4eca20d6f7
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 4eca20d6f7

Tree-SHA512: 5bef1f1e7703f304128cf0eb8945e139e031580c99062bbbe15bf4db8443c2ba5a8c65844833132e6646c8980c678fc1d2ab0c63e17105585d583570ee350fd0
This commit is contained in:
W. J. van der Laan
2021-04-01 19:00:34 +02:00
3 changed files with 11 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@@ -690,7 +690,8 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws)
}
}
// Bring the best block into scope
// This is const, but calls into the back end CoinsViews. The CCoinsViewDB at the bottom of the
// hierarchy brings the best block into scope. See CCoinsViewDB::GetBestBlock().
m_view.GetBestBlock();
// we have all inputs cached now, so switch back to dummy (to protect
@@ -1099,9 +1100,9 @@ static MempoolAcceptResult AcceptToMemoryPoolWithTime(const CChainParams& chainp
assert(std::addressof(::ChainstateActive()) == std::addressof(active_chainstate));
const MempoolAcceptResult result = MemPoolAccept(pool, active_chainstate).AcceptSingleTransaction(tx, args);
if (result.m_result_type != MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID) {
// Remove coins that were not present in the coins cache before calling ATMPW;
// this is to prevent memory DoS in case we receive a large number of
// invalid transactions that attempt to overrun the in-memory coins cache
// Remove coins that were not present in the coins cache before calling
// AcceptSingleTransaction(); this is to prevent memory DoS in case we receive a large
// number of invalid transactions that attempt to overrun the in-memory coins cache
// (`CCoinsViewCache::cacheCoins`).
for (const COutPoint& hashTx : coins_to_uncache)