mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-04-15 01:58:09 +02:00
Fold GetSelectionWaste() into ComputeAndSetWaste()
Both `GetSelectionWaste()` and `ComputeAndSetWaste()` now are part of `SelectionResult`. Instead of `ComputeAndSetWaste()` being a wrapper for `GetSelectionWaste()`, we combine them to a new function `RecalculateWaste()`. As I was combining the logic of the two functions, I noticed that `GetSelectionWaste()` was making the odd assumption that the `change_cost` being set to zero means that no change is created. However, if we build transactions at a feerate of zero with the `discard_feerate` also set to zero, we'd organically have a `change_cost` of zero, even when we create change on a transaction. This commit cleans up this duplicate meaning of `change_cost` and relies on `GetChange()` to figure out whether there is change on basis of the `min_viable_change` and whatever is left after deducting fees. Since this broke a bunch of tests that relied on the double-meaning of `change_cost` a bunch of tests had to be fixed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> ChooseSelectionResult(interfaces::Chain& chain, co
|
||||
|
||||
if (coin_selection_params.m_effective_feerate > CFeeRate{3 * coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate}) { // Minimize input set for feerates of at least 3×LTFRE (default: 30 ṩ/vB+)
|
||||
if (auto cg_result{CoinGrinder(groups.positive_group, nTargetValue, coin_selection_params.m_min_change_target, max_inputs_weight)}) {
|
||||
cg_result->ComputeAndSetWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
cg_result->RecalculateWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
results.push_back(*cg_result);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
append_error(cg_result);
|
||||
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> ChooseSelectionResult(interfaces::Chain& chain, co
|
||||
if (bump_fee_overestimate) {
|
||||
result.SetBumpFeeDiscount(bump_fee_overestimate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
result.ComputeAndSetWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
result.RecalculateWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Choose the result with the least waste
|
||||
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> SelectCoins(const CWallet& wallet, CoinsResult& av
|
||||
if (selection_target <= 0) {
|
||||
SelectionResult result(nTargetValue, SelectionAlgorithm::MANUAL);
|
||||
result.AddInputs(pre_set_inputs.coins, coin_selection_params.m_subtract_fee_outputs);
|
||||
result.ComputeAndSetWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
result.RecalculateWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change, coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change, coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> SelectCoins(const CWallet& wallet, CoinsResult& av
|
||||
SelectionResult preselected(pre_set_inputs.total_amount, SelectionAlgorithm::MANUAL);
|
||||
preselected.AddInputs(pre_set_inputs.coins, coin_selection_params.m_subtract_fee_outputs);
|
||||
op_selection_result->Merge(preselected);
|
||||
op_selection_result->ComputeAndSetWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change,
|
||||
op_selection_result->RecalculateWaste(coin_selection_params.min_viable_change,
|
||||
coin_selection_params.m_cost_of_change,
|
||||
coin_selection_params.m_change_fee);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user