Bugfix: Grammar fixes

This commit is contained in:
Corinne Dashjr
2015-04-28 14:48:28 +00:00
committed by Luke Dashjr
parent 18d2832678
commit 7e6d23b171
30 changed files with 79 additions and 80 deletions

View File

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ bool function(int arg1, const char *arg2)
```
A complete list of `@xxx` commands can be found at http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/commands.html.
As Doxygen recognizes the comments by the delimiters (`/**` and `*/` in this case), you don't
*need* to provide any commands for a comment to be valid, just a description text is fine.
*need* to provide any commands for a comment to be valid; just a description text is fine.
To describe a class use the same construct above the class definition:
```c++
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ Threads
Pull Request Terminology
------------------------
Concept ACK - Agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't reviewed the code changes or tested them.
Concept ACK - Agree with the idea and overall direction, but have neither reviewed nor tested the code changes.
utACK (untested ACK) - Reviewed and agree with the code changes but haven't actually tested them.
@ -183,4 +183,4 @@ Tested ACK - Reviewed the code changes and have verified the functionality or bu
ACK - A loose ACK can be confusing. It's best to avoid them unless it's a documentation/comment only change in which case there is nothing to test/verify; therefore the tested/untested distinction is not there.
NACK - Disagree with the code changes/concept. Should be accompanied by an explanation.
NACK - Disagree with the code changes/concept. Should be accompanied by an explanation.