highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-07-03 04:01:43 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #21525: [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4

Browse Source 
693414d271 node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
98c4e252f0 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
7e8b5ee814 validation: Make BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex const (Carl Dong)
88aead263c node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions (Carl Dong)
1dd8ed7a84 net_processing: Move comments to declarations (Carl Dong)
07156eb387 node/coinstats: Replace #include with fwd-declaration (Carl Dong)
7b8e976cd5 miner: Add chainstate member to BlockAssembler (Carl Dong)
e62067e7bc Revert "miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock" (Carl Dong)
eede0647b0 Revert "scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate" (Carl Dong)
0c1b2bc549 Revert "miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param" (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Chronological history of this changeset:
  1. Bundle 4 (#21270) got merged
  2. Posthumous reviews were posted
  3. These changes were prepended in bundle 5
  4. More reviews were added in bundle 5
  5. Someone suggested that we split the prepended changes up to another PR
  6. This is that PR

  In the future, I will just do posthumous review changes in another PR instead. I apologize for the confusion.

  Addresses posthumous reviews on bundle 4:
    - From jnewbery:
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#issuecomment-796738048
        - I didn't fix this one, but I added a `TODO` comment so that we don't lost track of it
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592291225
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592296942
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592299738
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592301704
    - From MarcoFalke:
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593096212
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097032
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097867
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593100570

  Addresses reviews on bundle 5:
  - Checking chainman existence before locking cs_main
    - MarcoFalke
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601776
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601876
  - Appropriate locking, usage of chainman, and control flow in `src/node/interfaces.cpp`
    - MarcoFalke
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601383
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029360
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029921
    - ryanofsky
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597163828
  - Style/comment formatting changes
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597026552
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597027186
  - Making LookupBlockIndex const
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597035062

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 693414d271 🛐
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 693414d271. I reviewed this previously as part of #21391. I am a fan of the increasingly complicated bundle numbering, and kind of hope there in the next round there is some way we can get bundles 5.333333 and 5.666667!
  jamesob:
    ACK 693414d271 ([`jamesob/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f))

Tree-SHA512: 9bdc199f70400d01764e1bd03c25bdb6cff26dcef60e4ca3b649baf8d017a2dfc1f058099067962b4b6ccd32d078002b1389d733039f4c337558cb70324c0ee3
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2021-04-01 10:58:37 +02:00
parent c2caa0fc4d 693414d271
commit 80a699fda9
15 changed files with 148 additions and 115 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

101
src/net_processing.cpp
View File

@ -482,19 +482,70 @@ private:
/** Offset into vExtraTxnForCompact to insert the next tx */
size_t vExtraTxnForCompactIt GUARDED_BY(g_cs_orphans) = 0;
/** Check whether the last unknown block a peer advertised is not yet known. */
void ProcessBlockAvailability(NodeId nodeid) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
/** Update tracking information about which blocks a peer is assumed to have. */
void UpdateBlockAvailability(NodeId nodeid, const uint256& hash) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
bool CanDirectFetch() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
/**
* To prevent fingerprinting attacks, only send blocks/headers outside of
* the active chain if they are no more than a month older (both in time,
* and in best equivalent proof of work) than the best header chain we know
* about and we fully-validated them at some point.
*/
bool BlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
bool AlreadyHaveBlock(const uint256& block_hash) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
void ProcessGetBlockData(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const CInv& inv);
/**
* Validation logic for compact filters request handling.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] filter_type The filter type the request is for. Must be basic filters.
* @param[in] start_height The start height for the request
* @param[in] stop_hash The stop_hash for the request
* @param[in] max_height_diff The maximum number of items permitted to request, as specified in BIP 157
* @param[out] stop_index The CBlockIndex for the stop_hash block, if the request can be serviced.
* @param[out] filter_index The filter index, if the request can be serviced.
* @return True if the request can be serviced.
*/
bool PrepareBlockFilterRequest(CNode& peer,
BlockFilterType filter_type, uint32_t start_height,
const uint256& stop_hash, uint32_t max_height_diff,
const CBlockIndex*& stop_index,
BlockFilterIndex*& filter_index);
/**
* Handle a cfilters request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void ProcessGetCFilters(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv);
/**
* Handle a cfheaders request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void ProcessGetCFHeaders(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv);
/**
* Handle a getcfcheckpt request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void ProcessGetCFCheckPt(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv);
};
} // namespace
@ -748,7 +799,6 @@ static bool PeerHasHeader(CNodeState *state, const CBlockIndex *pindex) EXCLUSIV
return false;
}
/** Check whether the last unknown block a peer advertised is not yet known. */
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessBlockAvailability(NodeId nodeid) {
CNodeState *state = State(nodeid);
assert(state != nullptr);
@ -764,7 +814,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessBlockAvailability(NodeId nodeid) {
}
}
/** Update tracking information about which blocks a peer is assumed to have. */
void PeerManagerImpl::UpdateBlockAvailability(NodeId nodeid, const uint256 &hash) {
CNodeState *state = State(nodeid);
assert(state != nullptr);
@ -1191,16 +1240,6 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationStat
return false;
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// blockchain -> download logic notification
//
// To prevent fingerprinting attacks, only send blocks/headers outside of the
// active chain if they are no more than a month older (both in time, and in
// best equivalent proof of work) than the best header chain we know about and
// we fully-validated them at some point.
bool PeerManagerImpl::BlockRequestAllowed(const CBlockIndex* pindex)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
@ -2101,20 +2140,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessOrphanTx(std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set)
m_mempool.check(m_chainman.ActiveChainstate());
}
/**
* Validation logic for compact filters request handling.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] filter_type The filter type the request is for. Must be basic filters.
* @param[in] start_height The start height for the request
* @param[in] stop_hash The stop_hash for the request
* @param[in] max_height_diff The maximum number of items permitted to request, as specified in BIP 157
* @param[out] stop_index The CBlockIndex for the stop_hash block, if the request can be serviced.
* @param[out] filter_index The filter index, if the request can be serviced.
* @return True if the request can be serviced.
*/
bool PeerManagerImpl::PrepareBlockFilterRequest(CNode& peer,
BlockFilterType filter_type, uint32_t start_height,
const uint256& stop_hash, uint32_t max_height_diff,
@ -2168,14 +2193,6 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::PrepareBlockFilterRequest(CNode& peer,
return true;
}
/**
* Handle a cfilters request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetCFilters(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv)
{
uint8_t filter_type_ser;
@ -2207,14 +2224,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetCFilters(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv)
}
}
/**
* Handle a cfheaders request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetCFHeaders(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv)
{
uint8_t filter_type_ser;
@ -2259,14 +2268,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetCFHeaders(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv)
m_connman.PushMessage(&peer, std::move(msg));
}
/**
* Handle a getcfcheckpt request.
*
* May disconnect from the peer in the case of a bad request.
*
* @param[in] peer The peer that we received the request from
* @param[in] vRecv The raw message received
*/
void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetCFCheckPt(CNode& peer, CDataStream& vRecv)
{
uint8_t filter_type_ser;