Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25574: validation: Improve error handling when VerifyDB dosn't finish successfully

0af16e7134 doc: add release note for #25574 (Martin Zumsande)
57ef2a4812 validation: report if pruning prevents completion of verification (Martin Zumsande)
0c7785bb25 init, validation: Improve handling if VerifyDB() fails due to insufficient dbcache (Martin Zumsande)
d6f781f1cf validation: return VerifyDBResult::INTERRUPTED if verification was interrupted (Martin Zumsande)
6360b5302d validation: Change return value of VerifyDB to enum type (Martin Zumsande)

Pull request description:

  `VerifyDB()` can fail to complete due to insufficient dbcache at the level 3 checks. This PR improves the error handling in this case in the following ways:
  - The rpc `-verifychain` now returns false if the check can't be completed due to insufficient cache
  - During init, we only log a warning if the default values for `-checkblocks` and `-checklevel` are taken and the check doesn't complete. However, if the user actively specifies one of these args, we return with an InitError if we can't complete the check.

  This PR also changes `-verifychain` RPC to return `false` if the verification didn't finish due to missing block data (pruning) or due to being interrupted by the node being shutdown.

  Previously, this PR also included a fix for a possible assert during verification - this was done in #27009 (now merged).

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 0af16e7134
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 0af16e7134. Only small suggested changes since the last review, like renaming some of the enum values. I did leave more suggestions, but they are not very important and could be followups
  john-moffett:
    ACK 0af16e7134
  MarcoFalke:
    lgtm re-ACK 0af16e7134 🎚

Tree-SHA512: 84b4f767cf9bfbafef362312757c9bf765b41ae3977f4ece840e40c52a2266b1457832df0cdf70440be0aac2168d9b58fc817238630b0b6812f3836ca950bc0e
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Chow
2023-02-22 14:10:18 -05:00
9 changed files with 86 additions and 28 deletions

View File

@@ -192,12 +192,23 @@ ChainstateLoadResult VerifyLoadedChainstate(ChainstateManager& chainman, const C
"Only rebuild the block database if you are sure that your computer's date and time are correct")};
}
if (!CVerifyDB().VerifyDB(
*chainstate, chainman.GetConsensus(), chainstate->CoinsDB(),
options.check_level,
options.check_blocks)) {
VerifyDBResult result = CVerifyDB().VerifyDB(
*chainstate, chainman.GetConsensus(), chainstate->CoinsDB(),
options.check_level,
options.check_blocks);
switch (result) {
case VerifyDBResult::SUCCESS:
case VerifyDBResult::INTERRUPTED:
case VerifyDBResult::SKIPPED_MISSING_BLOCKS:
break;
case VerifyDBResult::CORRUPTED_BLOCK_DB:
return {ChainstateLoadStatus::FAILURE, _("Corrupted block database detected")};
}
case VerifyDBResult::SKIPPED_L3_CHECKS:
if (options.require_full_verification) {
return {ChainstateLoadStatus::FAILURE_INSUFFICIENT_DBCACHE, _("Insufficient dbcache for block verification")};
}
break;
} // no default case, so the compiler can warn about missing cases
}
}