mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-06-06 19:23:41 +02:00
Merge #14935: tests: Test for expected return values when calling functions returning a success code
c84c2b8c92 tests: Test for expected return values when calling functions returning a success code (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Test for expected return values when calling functions returning a success code (instead of discarding the return values).
**Note to reviewers:** The following commands can be used to verify that the only text fragments added in this PR are `BOOST_CHECK(`, `!` and `)` :
```
$ git diff HEAD~1 | grep -E '^[\-][^\-]' | cut -b2- > before.txt
$ git diff HEAD~1 | grep -E '^[\+][^\+]' | cut -b2- > after.txt
$ cat after.txt | sed 's/BOOST_CHECK(//g' | sed 's/));/);/g' | tr -d '!' > after-sed.txt
$ diff -u before.txt after-sed.txt
$
```
Tree-SHA512: ff0863ef2046a2eda3c44e9c6b9aedfe167881f2fa58db29fef859416831233ef6502a3a11fd2322bc1a924db83df8d4a5c5879298007f2a7b085e2a7286af70
This commit is contained in:
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
|
||||
// Test starts here
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1); // should result in getheaders
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_vSend);
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
|
||||
SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60);
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1); // should result in getheaders
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_vSend);
|
||||
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
|
||||
SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60);
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1); // should result in disconnect
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in disconnect
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true);
|
||||
SetMockTime(0);
|
||||
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned
|
||||
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet...
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be
|
||||
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1));
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1));
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));
|
||||
gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD));
|
||||
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(cs_main, dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing);
|
||||
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode));
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans)
|
||||
CKey key;
|
||||
key.MakeNewKey(true);
|
||||
CBasicKeyStore keystore;
|
||||
keystore.AddKey(key);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(keystore.AddKey(key));
|
||||
|
||||
// 50 orphan transactions:
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
|
||||
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans)
|
||||
tx.vout.resize(1);
|
||||
tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
|
||||
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(key.GetPubKey().GetID());
|
||||
SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL));
|
||||
|
||||
AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans)
|
||||
tx.vin[j].prevout.n = j;
|
||||
tx.vin[j].prevout.hash = txPrev->GetHash();
|
||||
}
|
||||
SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL));
|
||||
// Re-use same signature for other inputs
|
||||
// (they don't have to be valid for this test)
|
||||
for (unsigned int j = 1; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user