mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-01-19 06:43:45 +01:00
MOVEONLY: check that fees > direct conflicts to policy/rbf
This commit is contained in:
@@ -782,30 +782,8 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws)
|
||||
if (fReplacementTransaction)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CFeeRate newFeeRate(nModifiedFees, nSize);
|
||||
for (const auto& mi : setIterConflicting) {
|
||||
// Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the
|
||||
// mempool.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We usually don't want to accept replacements with lower
|
||||
// feerates than what they replaced as that would lower the
|
||||
// feerate of the next block. Requiring that the feerate always
|
||||
// be increased is also an easy-to-reason about way to prevent
|
||||
// DoS attacks via replacements.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We only consider the feerates of transactions being directly
|
||||
// replaced, not their indirect descendants. While that does
|
||||
// mean high feerate children are ignored when deciding whether
|
||||
// or not to replace, we do require the replacement to pay more
|
||||
// overall fees too, mitigating most cases.
|
||||
CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
|
||||
if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee",
|
||||
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
|
||||
hash.ToString(),
|
||||
newFeeRate.ToString(),
|
||||
oldFeeRate.ToString()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (const auto err_string{PaysMoreThanConflicts(setIterConflicting, newFeeRate, hash)}) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", *err_string);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Calculate all conflicting entries and enforce Rule #5.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user