Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35580: bugfix: compare non-adjusted chunk weight against block weight limit

5be248341a bugfix: compare real chunk weight against block weight limit (ismaelsadeeq)
fc98790869 test: `TestChunkBlockLimits` uses incorrect weight for comparison (ismaelsadeeq)

Pull request description:

  Partially fixes #35596

  When assembling a block template, `BlockAssembler::addChunks()` adds chunks of transactions until the block is close to being full. For each chunk, `TestChunkBlockLimits()` checks both the weight and the sigop-cost limits before the chunk is included.

  The weight check compared the chunk's **sigops-adjusted** weight against   `block_max_weight`:

    ```cpp
    if (nBlockWeight + chunk_feerate.size >= m_options.block_max_weight) {
        return false;
    }
  ```

  Whereas `nBlockWeight`  accumulates the actual chunk weight.

  A chunk whose sigop-adjusted weight exceeds the actual weight can be wrongly skipped even though the block sigop limit is enforced independently on the next line, and that could pass. Those chunks pay higher fees, so this could potentially cause miners to needlessly forfeit some fees revenue.

  This PR fixes this by passing the chunk's real weight (sum of `GetTxWeight()`, accumulated in the same loop that already sums sigop cost) to `TestChunkBlockLimits()`. The separate sigop-cost check is unchanged.

    - The first commit adds `TestSigOpsAdjustedWeightChunkLimit`: it builds one sigop-dense transaction sized to fit by real weight but not by adjusted weight, and asserts that the tx is skipped and only the coinbase is mined.

    - The second commit applies the fix and flips the assertion to show the transaction is now included.

ACKs for top commit:
  pablomartin4btc:
    Code Review ACK 5be248341a
  sedited:
    ACK 5be248341a

Tree-SHA512: b3fe9bfaa6d83d713d0243c0fc0d0fb8e68e1060bf6d606e43d9a52bd1ec07e42c561a1ba3426f180903726826c4a664bb131ddc5160354a96e3454d538fbf6c

src/node/miner.cpp

@@ -243,11 +243,11 @@ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock()
     return std::move(pblocktemplate);
 }
 
-bool BlockAssembler::TestChunkBlockLimits(FeePerWeight chunk_feerate, int64_t chunk_sigops_cost) const
+bool BlockAssembler::TestChunkBlockLimits(int64_t chunk_weight, int64_t chunk_sigops_cost) const
 {
     // block_max_weight has been flattened before block assembly limit checks.
     Assert(m_options.block_max_weight);
-    if (nBlockWeight + chunk_feerate.size >= *m_options.block_max_weight) {
+    if (nBlockWeight + chunk_weight >= m_options.block_max_weight) {
         return false;
     }
     if (nBlockSigOpsCost + chunk_sigops_cost >= MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST) {
@@ -310,12 +310,14 @@ void BlockAssembler::addChunks()
         }
 
         int64_t chunk_sig_ops = 0;
+        int64_t chunk_weight = 0;
         for (const auto& tx : selected_transactions) {
             chunk_sig_ops += tx.get().GetSigOpCost();
+            chunk_weight += tx.get().GetTxWeight();
         }
 
         // Check to see if this chunk will fit.
-        if (!TestChunkBlockLimits(chunk_feerate, chunk_sig_ops) || !TestChunkTransactions(selected_transactions)) {
+        if (!TestChunkBlockLimits(chunk_weight, chunk_sig_ops) || !TestChunkTransactions(selected_transactions)) {
             // This chunk won't fit, so we skip it and will try the next best one.
             m_mempool->SkipBuilderChunk();
             ++nConsecutiveFailed;

src/node/miner.h

@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ private:
 
     // helper functions for addChunks()
     /** Test if a new chunk would "fit" in the block */
-    bool TestChunkBlockLimits(FeePerWeight chunk_feerate, int64_t chunk_sigops_cost) const;
+    bool TestChunkBlockLimits(int64_t chunk_weight, int64_t chunk_sigops_cost) const;
     /** Perform locktime checks on each transaction in a chunk:
       * This check should always succeed, and is here
       * only as an extra check in case of a bug */