Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33042: refactor: inline constant return values from dbwrapper write methods

743abbcbde refactor: inline constant return value of `BlockTreeDB::WriteBatchSync` and `BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB` and `BlockTreeDB::WriteFlag` (Lőrinc)
e030240e90 refactor: inline constant return value of `CDBWrapper::Erase` and `BlockTreeDB::WriteReindexing` (Lőrinc)
cdab9480e9 refactor: inline constant return value of `CDBWrapper::Write` (Lőrinc)
d1847cf5b5 refactor: inline constant return value of `TxIndex::DB::WriteTxs` (Lőrinc)
50b63a5698 refactor: inline constant return value of `CDBWrapper::WriteBatch` (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144#discussion_r2223587480

  ### Summary
  `WriteBatch` always returns `true` - the errors are handled by throwing `dbwrapper_error` instead.

  ### Context
  This boolean return value of the `Write` methods is confusing because it's inconsistent with `CDBWrapper::Read`, which catches exceptions and returns a boolean to indicate success/failure. It's bad that `Read` returns and `Write` throws - but it's a lot worse that `Write` advertises a return value when it actually communicates errors through exceptions.

  ### Solution
  This PR removes the constant return values from write methods and inlines `true` at their call sites. Many upstream methods had boolean return values only because they were propagating these constants - those have been cleaned up as well.

  Methods that returned a constant `true` value that now return `void`:
  - `CDBWrapper::WriteBatch`, `CDBWrapper::Write`, `CDBWrapper::Erase`
  - `TxIndex::DB::WriteTxs`
  - `BlockTreeDB::WriteReindexing`, `BlockTreeDB::WriteBatchSync`, `BlockTreeDB::WriteFlag`
  - `BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB`

  ### Note
  `CCoinsView::BatchWrite` (and transitively `CCoinsViewCache::Flush` & `CCoinsViewCache::Sync`) were intentionally not changed here. While all implementations return `true`, the base `CCoinsView::BatchWrite` returns `false`. Changing this would cause `coins_view` tests to fail with:
  > terminating due to uncaught exception of type std::logic_error: Not all unspent flagged entries were cleared

  We can fix that in a follow-up PR.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 743abbcbde
  janb84:
    ACK 743abbcbde
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 743abbcbde
  sipa:
    ACK 743abbcbde

Tree-SHA512: b2a550bff066216f1958d2dd9a7ef6a9949de518cc636f8ab9c670e0b7a330c1eb8c838e458a8629acb8ac980cea6616955cd84436a7b8ab9096f6d648073b1e
This commit is contained in:
Ava Chow
2025-11-10 09:15:24 -08:00
12 changed files with 53 additions and 59 deletions

View File

@@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ bool BlockTreeDB::ReadBlockFileInfo(int nFile, CBlockFileInfo& info)
return Read(std::make_pair(DB_BLOCK_FILES, nFile), info);
}
bool BlockTreeDB::WriteReindexing(bool fReindexing)
void BlockTreeDB::WriteReindexing(bool fReindexing)
{
if (fReindexing) {
return Write(DB_REINDEX_FLAG, uint8_t{'1'});
Write(DB_REINDEX_FLAG, uint8_t{'1'});
} else {
return Erase(DB_REINDEX_FLAG);
Erase(DB_REINDEX_FLAG);
}
}
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ bool BlockTreeDB::ReadLastBlockFile(int& nFile)
return Read(DB_LAST_BLOCK, nFile);
}
bool BlockTreeDB::WriteBatchSync(const std::vector<std::pair<int, const CBlockFileInfo*>>& fileInfo, int nLastFile, const std::vector<const CBlockIndex*>& blockinfo)
void BlockTreeDB::WriteBatchSync(const std::vector<std::pair<int, const CBlockFileInfo*>>& fileInfo, int nLastFile, const std::vector<const CBlockIndex*>& blockinfo)
{
CDBBatch batch(*this);
for (const auto& [file, info] : fileInfo) {
@@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ bool BlockTreeDB::WriteBatchSync(const std::vector<std::pair<int, const CBlockFi
for (const CBlockIndex* bi : blockinfo) {
batch.Write(std::make_pair(DB_BLOCK_INDEX, bi->GetBlockHash()), CDiskBlockIndex{bi});
}
return WriteBatch(batch, true);
WriteBatch(batch, true);
}
bool BlockTreeDB::WriteFlag(const std::string& name, bool fValue)
void BlockTreeDB::WriteFlag(const std::string& name, bool fValue)
{
return Write(std::make_pair(DB_FLAG, name), fValue ? uint8_t{'1'} : uint8_t{'0'});
Write(std::make_pair(DB_FLAG, name), fValue ? uint8_t{'1'} : uint8_t{'0'});
}
bool BlockTreeDB::ReadFlag(const std::string& name, bool& fValue)
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ bool BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex(const std::optional<uint256>& snapshot_blockha
return true;
}
bool BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB()
void BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB()
{
AssertLockHeld(::cs_main);
std::vector<std::pair<int, const CBlockFileInfo*>> vFiles;
@@ -493,10 +493,7 @@ bool BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB()
m_dirty_blockindex.erase(it++);
}
int max_blockfile = WITH_LOCK(cs_LastBlockFile, return this->MaxBlockfileNum());
if (!m_block_tree_db->WriteBatchSync(vFiles, max_blockfile, vBlocks)) {
return false;
}
return true;
m_block_tree_db->WriteBatchSync(vFiles, max_blockfile, vBlocks);
}
bool BlockManager::LoadBlockIndexDB(const std::optional<uint256>& snapshot_blockhash)