mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-11-12 15:09:59 +01:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25223: [kernel 2e/n] miner: Make mempool optional, stop constructing temporary empty mempools
0f1a259657miner: Make mempool optional for BlockAssembler (Carl Dong)cc5739b27dminer: Make UpdatePackagesForAdded static (Carl Dong)f024578b3aminer: Absorb SkipMapTxEntry into addPackageTxs (Carl Dong) Pull request description: This is part of the libbitcoinkernel project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 This is **_NOT_** dependent on, but is a "companion-PR" to #25215. ### Abstract This PR removes the need to construct `BlockAssembler` with temporary, empty mempools in cases where we don't want to source transactions from the mempool (e.g. in `TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock` and `generateblock`). After this PR, `BlockAssembler` will accept a `CTxMemPool` pointer and handle the `nullptr` case instead of requiring a `CTxMemPool` reference. An overview of the changes is best seen in the changes in the header file: ```diff diff --git a/src/node/miner.h b/src/node/miner.h index 7cf8e3fb9e..7e9f503602 100644 --- a/src/node/miner.h +++ b/src/node/miner.h @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ private: int64_t m_lock_time_cutoff; const CChainParams& chainparams; - const CTxMemPool& m_mempool; + const CTxMemPool* m_mempool; CChainState& m_chainstate; public: @@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ public: CFeeRate blockMinFeeRate; }; - explicit BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const CTxMemPool& mempool); - explicit BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const CTxMemPool& mempool, const Options& options); + explicit BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const CTxMemPool* mempool); + explicit BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const CTxMemPool* mempool, const Options& options); /** Construct a new block template with coinbase to scriptPubKeyIn */ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> CreateNewBlock(const CScript& scriptPubKeyIn); @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ private: /** Add transactions based on feerate including unconfirmed ancestors * Increments nPackagesSelected / nDescendantsUpdated with corresponding * statistics from the package selection (for logging statistics). */ - void addPackageTxs(int& nPackagesSelected, int& nDescendantsUpdated) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(m_mempool.cs); + void addPackageTxs(const CTxMemPool& mempool, int& nPackagesSelected, int& nDescendantsUpdated) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mempool.cs); // helper functions for addPackageTxs() /** Remove confirmed (inBlock) entries from given set */ @@ -189,15 +189,8 @@ private: * These checks should always succeed, and they're here * only as an extra check in case of suboptimal node configuration */ bool TestPackageTransactions(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& package) const; - /** Return true if given transaction from mapTx has already been evaluated, - * or if the transaction's cached data in mapTx is incorrect. */ - bool SkipMapTxEntry(CTxMemPool::txiter it, indexed_modified_transaction_set& mapModifiedTx, CTxMemPool::setEntries& failedTx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(m_mempool.cs); /** Sort the package in an order that is valid to appear in a block */ void SortForBlock(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& package, std::vector<CTxMemPool::txiter>& sortedEntries); - /** Add descendants of given transactions to mapModifiedTx with ancestor - * state updated assuming given transactions are inBlock. Returns number - * of updated descendants. */ - int UpdatePackagesForAdded(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& alreadyAdded, indexed_modified_transaction_set& mapModifiedTx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(m_mempool.cs); }; int64_t UpdateTime(CBlockHeader* pblock, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev); ``` ### Alternatives Aside from approach in this current PR, we can also take the approach of moving the `CTxMemPool*` argument from the `BlockAssembler` constructor to `BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock`, since that's where it's needed anyway. I did not push this approach because it requires quite a lot of call sites to be changed. However, I do have it coded up and can do that if people express a strong preference. This would look something like: ``` BlockAssembler::BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const Options& options); BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(const CScript& scriptPubKeyIn, const CTxMemPool* maybe_mempool); ``` ### Future work Although wholly out of scope for this PR, we could potentially refine the `BlockAssembler` interface further, so that we have: ``` BlockAssembler::BlockAssembler(CChainState& chainstate, const Options& options); BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(const CScript& scriptPubKeyIn, std::vector<CTransaction>& txs); BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(const CScript& scriptPubKeyIn, const CTxMemPool& mempool); ``` Whereby `TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock` and `generateblock` would call the `BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock` that takes in `CTransaction`s and we can potentially remove `RegenerateCommitments` altogether. All other callers can use the `CTxMemPool` version. ACKs for top commit: glozow: ACK0f1a259657laanwj: Code review ACK0f1a259657MarcoFalke: ACK0f1a259657🐊 Tree-SHA512: 2b4b1dbb43d85719f241ad1f19ceb7fc50cf764721da425a3d1ff71bd16328c4f86acff22e565bc9abee770d3ac8827a6676b66daa93dbf42dd817ad929e9448
This commit is contained in:
@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock(
|
||||
const CScript& scriptPubKey,
|
||||
CChainState& chainstate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CTxMemPool empty_pool;
|
||||
CBlock block = BlockAssembler{chainstate, empty_pool}.CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
|
||||
CBlock block = BlockAssembler{chainstate, nullptr}.CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(block.vtx.size() == 1);
|
||||
for (const CMutableTransaction& tx : txns) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user