Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32364: refactor: validation: mark CheckBlockIndex as const

3e6ac5bf77 refactor: validation: mark CheckBlockIndex as const (stickies-v)
61a51eccbb validation: don't use GetAll() in CheckBlockIndex() (stickies-v)
d05481df64 refactor: validation: mark SnapshotBase as const (stickies-v)

Pull request description:

  While reviewing another PR, I [noticed](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31405#discussion_r2056509235) that `ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()`  is not a `const` method. To try and assert that this method was not causing any side-effects, I modified the method to make it `const`. It did not surface any errors, but I think it would be good to merge this change regardless, even if `CheckBlockIndex` is only used in regtest.

  This PR removes `CheckBlockIndex()`'s calls to non-const `ChainstateManager` methods by marking `SnapshotBase` `const` and ~inlining the `GetAll()` calls (thereby also performing consistency checks on invalid or fully validated `m_disabled==true` chainstates, as slight behaviour change), and finally marks `CheckBlockIndex()` as `const`.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 3e6ac5bf77
  mzumsande:
    Code Review ACK 3e6ac5bf77
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 3e6ac5bf77

Tree-SHA512: 3d3cd351f5af1fab9a9498218ec62dba6e397fc7b5f4868ae0a77dc2b7c813d12c4f53f253f209101a3f6523695014e20c82dfac27cf0035611d5dd29feb80b5
This commit is contained in:
Ava Chow
2025-05-27 15:33:09 -07:00
2 changed files with 27 additions and 26 deletions

View File

@@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ Chainstate::Chainstate(
m_chainman(chainman),
m_from_snapshot_blockhash(from_snapshot_blockhash) {}
const CBlockIndex* Chainstate::SnapshotBase()
const CBlockIndex* Chainstate::SnapshotBase() const
{
if (!m_from_snapshot_blockhash) return nullptr;
if (!m_cached_snapshot_base) m_cached_snapshot_base = Assert(m_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(*m_from_snapshot_blockhash));
@@ -5220,7 +5220,7 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ShouldCheckBlockIndex() const
return true;
}
void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex() const
{
if (!ShouldCheckBlockIndex()) {
return;
@@ -5245,7 +5245,7 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
assert(m_best_header);
best_hdr_chain.SetTip(*m_best_header);
std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*> forward;
std::multimap<const CBlockIndex*, const CBlockIndex*> forward;
for (auto& [_, block_index] : m_blockman.m_block_index) {
// Only save indexes in forward that are not part of the best header chain.
if (!best_hdr_chain.Contains(&block_index)) {
@@ -5256,27 +5256,27 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
}
assert(forward.size() + best_hdr_chain.Height() + 1 == m_blockman.m_block_index.size());
CBlockIndex* pindex = best_hdr_chain[0];
const CBlockIndex* pindex = best_hdr_chain[0];
assert(pindex);
// Iterate over the entire block tree, using depth-first search.
// Along the way, remember whether there are blocks on the path from genesis
// block being explored which are the first to have certain properties.
size_t nNodes = 0;
int nHeight = 0;
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstInvalid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which is invalid.
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstMissing = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_HAVE_DATA, since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNeverProcessed = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex for which nTx == 0, since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotTreeValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_TREE (regardless of being valid or not).
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotTransactionsValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotChainValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_CHAIN (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotScriptsValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstInvalid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which is invalid.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstMissing = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_HAVE_DATA, since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNeverProcessed = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex for which nTx == 0, since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotTreeValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_TREE (regardless of being valid or not).
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotTransactionsValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotChainValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_CHAIN (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
const CBlockIndex* pindexFirstNotScriptsValid = nullptr; // Oldest ancestor of pindex which does not have BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS (regardless of being valid or not), since assumeutxo snapshot if used.
// After checking an assumeutxo snapshot block, reset pindexFirst pointers
// to earlier blocks that have not been downloaded or validated yet, so
// checks for later blocks can assume the earlier blocks were validated and
// be stricter, testing for more requirements.
const CBlockIndex* snap_base{GetSnapshotBaseBlock()};
CBlockIndex *snap_first_missing{}, *snap_first_notx{}, *snap_first_notv{}, *snap_first_nocv{}, *snap_first_nosv{};
const CBlockIndex *snap_first_missing{}, *snap_first_notx{}, *snap_first_notv{}, *snap_first_nocv{}, *snap_first_nosv{};
auto snap_update_firsts = [&] {
if (pindex == snap_base) {
std::swap(snap_first_missing, pindexFirstMissing);
@@ -5317,8 +5317,8 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
if (pindex->pprev == nullptr) {
// Genesis block checks.
assert(pindex->GetBlockHash() == GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock); // Genesis block's hash must match.
for (auto c : GetAll()) {
if (c->m_chain.Genesis() != nullptr) {
for (const Chainstate* c : {m_ibd_chainstate.get(), m_snapshot_chainstate.get()}) {
if (c && c->m_chain.Genesis() != nullptr) {
assert(pindex == c->m_chain.Genesis()); // The chain's genesis block must be this block.
}
}
@@ -5371,8 +5371,8 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
}
// Chainstate-specific checks on setBlockIndexCandidates
for (auto c : GetAll()) {
if (c->m_chain.Tip() == nullptr) continue;
for (const Chainstate* c : {m_ibd_chainstate.get(), m_snapshot_chainstate.get()}) {
if (!c || c->m_chain.Tip() == nullptr) continue;
// Two main factors determine whether pindex is a candidate in
// setBlockIndexCandidates:
//
@@ -5416,7 +5416,7 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
// pindex only needs to be added if it is an ancestor of
// the snapshot that is being validated.
if (c == &ActiveChainstate() || snap_base->GetAncestor(pindex->nHeight) == pindex) {
assert(c->setBlockIndexCandidates.count(pindex));
assert(c->setBlockIndexCandidates.contains(const_cast<CBlockIndex*>(pindex)));
}
}
// If some parent is missing, then it could be that this block was in
@@ -5424,11 +5424,11 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
// In this case it must be in m_blocks_unlinked -- see test below.
}
} else { // If this block sorts worse than the current tip or some ancestor's block has never been seen, it cannot be in setBlockIndexCandidates.
assert(c->setBlockIndexCandidates.count(pindex) == 0);
assert(!c->setBlockIndexCandidates.contains(const_cast<CBlockIndex*>(pindex)));
}
}
// Check whether this block is in m_blocks_unlinked.
std::pair<std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator,std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator> rangeUnlinked = m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.equal_range(pindex->pprev);
auto rangeUnlinked{m_blockman.m_blocks_unlinked.equal_range(pindex->pprev)};
bool foundInUnlinked = false;
while (rangeUnlinked.first != rangeUnlinked.second) {
assert(rangeUnlinked.first->first == pindex->pprev);
@@ -5455,9 +5455,10 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
// tip.
// So if this block is itself better than any m_chain.Tip() and it wasn't in
// setBlockIndexCandidates, then it must be in m_blocks_unlinked.
for (auto c : GetAll()) {
for (const Chainstate* c : {m_ibd_chainstate.get(), m_snapshot_chainstate.get()}) {
if (!c) continue;
const bool is_active = c == &ActiveChainstate();
if (!CBlockIndexWorkComparator()(pindex, c->m_chain.Tip()) && c->setBlockIndexCandidates.count(pindex) == 0) {
if (!CBlockIndexWorkComparator()(pindex, c->m_chain.Tip()) && !c->setBlockIndexCandidates.contains(const_cast<CBlockIndex*>(pindex))) {
if (pindexFirstInvalid == nullptr) {
if (is_active || snap_base->GetAncestor(pindex->nHeight) == pindex) {
assert(foundInUnlinked);
@@ -5472,7 +5473,7 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
// Try descending into the first subnode. Always process forks first and the best header chain after.
snap_update_firsts();
std::pair<std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator,std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator> range = forward.equal_range(pindex);
auto range{forward.equal_range(pindex)};
if (range.first != range.second) {
// A subnode not part of the best header chain was found.
pindex = range.first->second;
@@ -5501,7 +5502,7 @@ void ChainstateManager::CheckBlockIndex()
// Find our parent.
CBlockIndex* pindexPar = pindex->pprev;
// Find which child we just visited.
std::pair<std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator,std::multimap<CBlockIndex*,CBlockIndex*>::iterator> rangePar = forward.equal_range(pindexPar);
auto rangePar{forward.equal_range(pindexPar)};
while (rangePar.first->second != pindex) {
assert(rangePar.first != rangePar.second); // Our parent must have at least the node we're coming from as child.
rangePar.first++;