Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21526: validation: UpdateTip/CheckBlockIndex assumeutxo support

673a5bd337 test: validation: add unittest for UpdateTip behavior (James O'Beirne)
2705570109 test: refactor: separate CreateBlock in TestChain100Setup (James O'Beirne)
298bf5d563 test: refactor: declare NoMalleation const auto (James O'Beirne)
071200993f move-only: unittest: add test/util/chainstate.h (James O'Beirne)
8f5710fd0a validation: fix CheckBlockIndex for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
5a807736da validation: insert assumed-valid block index entries into candidates (James O'Beirne)
01a9b8fe71 validation: set BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
42b2520db9 chain: add BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID for use with assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
b217020df7 validation: change UpdateTip for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
665072a36d doc: add comment for g_best_block (James O'Beirne)
ac4051d891 refactor: remove unused assumeutxo methods (James O'Beirne)
9f6bb53935 validation: add chainman ref to CChainState (James O'Beirne)

Pull request description:

  This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)

  ---

  Modify UpdateTip and CheckBlockIndex for use with multiple chainstates. Includes a new unittest verifying `g_best_block` behavior (previously untested at the unit level) and various changes necessary for running and testing `ProcessNewBlock()`-like behavior on the background validation chainstate.

  This changeset introduces a new block index `nStatus` flag called `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID`, and it is applied to block index entries that are beneath the UTXO snapshot base block upon snapshot load. Once each block is validated (during async background validation), the flag is removed. This allows us to avoid (ab)using `BLOCK_VALID_*` flags for snapshot chain block entries, and preserves the original meaning of those flags.

  Note: this PR previously incorporated changes to `LoadBlockIndex()` and `RewindBlockIndex()` as noted in Russ' comments below, but once I generated the changes necessary to test the UpdateTip change, I decided to split this changes out into another PR due to the size of this one.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 673a5bd337
  jonatack:
    Code-review re-ACK 673a5bd337 reviewed diff, rebased to master/debug build/ran unit+functional tests
  naumenkogs:
    ACK 673a5bd337
  fjahr:
    Code review ACK 673a5bd337
  ariard:
    utACK 673a5bd3
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 673a5bd337. Just linker fix and split commit changes mentioned https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#issuecomment-921064563 since last review
  benthecarman:
    ACK 673a5bd337

Tree-SHA512: 0a6dc23d041b27ed9fd0ee1f3e5971b92fb1d2df2fc9b655d5dc48594235321ab1798d06de2ec55482ac3966a9ed56de8d56e9e29cae75bbe8690bafc2dda383
This commit is contained in:
W. J. van der Laan
2021-09-23 21:07:32 +02:00
10 changed files with 314 additions and 119 deletions

View File

@@ -234,11 +234,14 @@ void TestChain100Setup::mineBlocks(int num_blocks)
}
}
CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateAndProcessBlock(const std::vector<CMutableTransaction>& txns, const CScript& scriptPubKey)
CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock(
const std::vector<CMutableTransaction>& txns,
const CScript& scriptPubKey,
CChainState& chainstate)
{
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
CTxMemPool empty_pool;
CBlock block = BlockAssembler(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), empty_pool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
CBlock block = BlockAssembler(chainstate, empty_pool, chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)->block;
Assert(block.vtx.size() == 1);
for (const CMutableTransaction& tx : txns) {
@@ -248,6 +251,20 @@ CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateAndProcessBlock(const std::vector<CMutableTransa
while (!CheckProofOfWork(block.GetHash(), block.nBits, chainparams.GetConsensus())) ++block.nNonce;
return block;
}
CBlock TestChain100Setup::CreateAndProcessBlock(
const std::vector<CMutableTransaction>& txns,
const CScript& scriptPubKey,
CChainState* chainstate)
{
if (!chainstate) {
chainstate = &Assert(m_node.chainman)->ActiveChainstate();
}
const CChainParams& chainparams = Params();
const CBlock block = this->CreateBlock(txns, scriptPubKey, *chainstate);
std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> shared_pblock = std::make_shared<const CBlock>(block);
Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(chainparams, shared_pblock, true, nullptr);