Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25337: refactor: encapsulate wallet's address book access

d69045e291 test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a642 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122f refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499 refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae41 wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)

Pull request description:

  ### Context

  The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.

  ### Problem

  Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.

  ### Solution

  Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.

  -------------------------------------------------------

  Extra Note:

  This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK d69045e291
  theStack:
    ACK d69045e291 ✅
  w0xlt:
    ACK d69045e291

Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a

test/functional/wallet_listreceivedby.py

@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ class ReceivedByTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
                             {"address": empty_addr},
                             {"address": empty_addr, "label": "", "amount": 0, "confirmations": 0, "txids": []})
 
+        # No returned addy should be a change addr
+        for node in self.nodes:
+            for addr_obj in node.listreceivedbyaddress():
+                assert_equal(node.getaddressinfo(addr_obj["address"])["ischange"], False)
+
         # Test Address filtering
         # Only on addr
         expected = {"address": addr, "label": "", "amount": Decimal("0.1"), "confirmations": 10, "txids": [txid, ]}