Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23325: mempool: delete exists(uint256) function

4307849256 [mempool] delete exists(uint256) function (glozow)
d50fbd4c5b create explicit GenTxid::{Txid, Wtxid} ctors (glozow)

Pull request description:

  We use the same type for txids and wtxids, `uint256`. In places where we want the ability to pass either one, we distinguish them using `GenTxid`.

  The (overloaded) `CTxMemPool::exists()` function is defined as follows:
  ```c
  bool exists(const uint256& txid) const { return exists(GenTxid{false, txid}); }
  ```
  It always assumes that a uint256 is a txid, which is a footgunny interface.
  Querying by wtxid returns a false negative if the transaction has a witness. 🐛

  Another approach would be to try both:
  ```c
  bool exists(const uint256& txid) const { return exists(GenTxid{false, txid}) || exists(GenTxid{false, txid}); }
  ```
  But that's slower and wrongfully placing the burden on the callee; the caller always knows whether the hash is a txid or a wtxid.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 4307849256
  jnewbery:
    Tested and code review ACK 4307849256
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 4307849256 👘

Tree-SHA512: 8ed167a96f3124b6c14e41073c8358658114ce121a15a4cca2db7a5ac565903a6236e34e88ac03382b8bb8b68e3999abbfc5718bc8c22476554d6b49a5298eec
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2021-10-22 12:29:23 +02:00
9 changed files with 31 additions and 30 deletions

View File

@@ -444,12 +444,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolSizeLimitTest)
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(5000LL).FromTx(tx2));
pool.TrimToSize(pool.DynamicMemoryUsage()); // should do nothing
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx1.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx2.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx1.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx2.GetHash())));
pool.TrimToSize(pool.DynamicMemoryUsage() * 3 / 4); // should remove the lower-feerate transaction
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx1.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx2.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx1.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx2.GetHash())));
pool.addUnchecked(entry.FromTx(tx2));
CMutableTransaction tx3 = CMutableTransaction();
@@ -462,14 +462,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolSizeLimitTest)
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(20000LL).FromTx(tx3));
pool.TrimToSize(pool.DynamicMemoryUsage() * 3 / 4); // tx3 should pay for tx2 (CPFP)
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx1.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx2.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx3.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx1.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx2.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx3.GetHash())));
pool.TrimToSize(GetVirtualTransactionSize(CTransaction(tx1))); // mempool is limited to tx1's size in memory usage, so nothing fits
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx1.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx2.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx3.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx1.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx2.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx3.GetHash())));
CFeeRate maxFeeRateRemoved(25000, GetVirtualTransactionSize(CTransaction(tx3)) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(CTransaction(tx2)));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(pool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK(), maxFeeRateRemoved.GetFeePerK() + 1000);
@@ -529,19 +529,19 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolSizeLimitTest)
// we only require this to remove, at max, 2 txn, because it's not clear what we're really optimizing for aside from that
pool.TrimToSize(pool.DynamicMemoryUsage() - 1);
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx4.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx6.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx7.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx4.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx6.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx7.GetHash())));
if (!pool.exists(tx5.GetHash()))
if (!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx5.GetHash())))
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(1000LL).FromTx(tx5));
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(9000LL).FromTx(tx7));
pool.TrimToSize(pool.DynamicMemoryUsage() / 2); // should maximize mempool size by only removing 5/7
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx4.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx5.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(tx6.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(tx7.GetHash()));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx4.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx5.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx6.GetHash())));
BOOST_CHECK(!pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx7.GetHash())));
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(1000LL).FromTx(tx5));
pool.addUnchecked(entry.Fee(9000LL).FromTx(tx7));