Merge #15437: p2p: Remove BIP61 reject messages

fa25f43ac5 p2p: Remove BIP61 reject messages (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Reject messages (BIP 61) appear in the following settings:

  * Parsing of reject messages (in case `-debug=net` is set, off by default). This has only been used for a single `LogPrint` call for several releases now. Such logging is completely meaningless to us and should thus be removed.

  * The sending of reject messages (in case `-enablebip61` is set, off by default). This can be used to debug a node that is under our control. Instead of hacking this debugging into the p2p protocol, it could be more easily achieved by parsing the debug log. (Use `-printtoconsole` to have it as stream, or read from the `debug.log` file like our python function `assert_debug_log` in the test framework does)

  Having to maintain all of this logic and code to accommodate debugging, which can be achieved by other means a lot easier, is a burden. It makes review on net processing changes a lot harder, since the reject message logic has to be carried around without introducing any errors or DOS vectors.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    utACK fa25f43ac5
  laanwj:
    I'm still not 100% convinced that I like getting rid of BIP61 conceptually, but apparently everyone wants it, code review ACK fa25f43ac5.
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK fa25f43ac5

Tree-SHA512: daf55254202925e56be3d6cfb3c1c804e7a82cecb1dd1e5bd7b472bae989fd68ac4f21ec53fc46751353056fd645f7f877bebcb0b40920257991423a3d99e0be
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-10-09 11:26:44 +02:00
15 changed files with 57 additions and 152 deletions

View File

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler, false);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler);
// Mock an outbound peer
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidat
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler, false);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, scheduler);
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
constexpr int max_outbound_full_relay = 8;
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler);
banman->ClearBanned();
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler);
banman->ClearBanned();
gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", "111"); // because 11 is my favorite number
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler, false);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), scheduler);
banman->ClearBanned();
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();