mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-11-12 23:18:14 +01:00
Merge #10699: Make all script validation flags backward compatible
01013f5Simplify tx validation tests (Pieter Wuille)2dd6f80Add a test that all flags are softforks (Pieter Wuille)2851b77Make all script verification flags softforks (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This change makes `SCRIPT_VERIFY_UPGRADABLE_NOPS` not apply to `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`. This is a no-op as `UPGRADABLE_NOPS` is only set for mempool transactions, and those always have `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY` set as well. The advantage is that setting more flags now always results in a reduction in acceptable scripts (=softfork). This results in a nice and testable property for validation, for which a new test is added. This also means that the introduction of a new definition for a NOP or witness version will likely need the following procedure (example OP_NOP8 here) * Remove OP_NOP8 from being affected by `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS`. * Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8`, which only applies to `OP_NOP8`. * Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` which implements the new consensus logic. * Before activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8` to the mempool flags. * After activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` to both the mempool and consensus flags. Tree-SHA512: d3b4538986ecf646aac9dba13a8d89318baf9e308e258547ca3b99e7c0509747f323edac6b1fea4e87e7d3c01b71193794b41679ae4f86f6e11ed6be3fd62c72
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
// should fail.
|
||||
// Capture this interaction with the upgraded_nop argument: set it when evaluating
|
||||
// any script flag that is implemented as an upgraded NOP code.
|
||||
void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache, bool upgraded_nop)
|
||||
void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_flags, bool add_to_cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PrecomputedTransactionData txdata(tx);
|
||||
// If we add many more flags, this loop can get too expensive, but we can
|
||||
@@ -124,12 +124,6 @@ void ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(CMutableTransaction &tx, uint32_t failing_fl
|
||||
// CheckInputs should succeed iff test_flags doesn't intersect with
|
||||
// failing_flags
|
||||
bool expected_return_value = !(test_flags & failing_flags);
|
||||
if (expected_return_value && upgraded_nop) {
|
||||
// If the script flag being tested corresponds to an upgraded NOP,
|
||||
// then script execution should fail if DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS
|
||||
// is set.
|
||||
expected_return_value = !(test_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ret, expected_return_value);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test the caching
|
||||
@@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
// not present. Don't add these checks to the cache, so that we can
|
||||
// test later that block validation works fine in the absence of cached
|
||||
// successes.
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(spend_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(spend_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_DERSIG | SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S | SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// And if we produce a block with this tx, it should be valid (DERSIG not
|
||||
// enabled yet), even though there's no cache entry.
|
||||
@@ -243,7 +237,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig2(p2pk_scriptPubKey.begin(), p2pk_scriptPubKey.end());
|
||||
invalid_under_p2sh_tx.vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig2;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_under_p2sh_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_under_p2sh_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
|
||||
@@ -266,7 +260,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_cltv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true, true);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_cltv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make it valid, and check again
|
||||
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
|
||||
@@ -294,7 +288,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
|
||||
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
|
||||
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_csv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true, true);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(invalid_with_csv_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make it valid, and check again
|
||||
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 100;
|
||||
@@ -323,11 +317,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
UpdateTransaction(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, sigdata);
|
||||
|
||||
// This should be valid under all script flags.
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, 0, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Remove the witness, and check that it is now invalid.
|
||||
valid_with_witness_tx.vin[0].scriptWitness.SetNull();
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(valid_with_witness_tx, SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -352,7 +346,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This should be valid under all script flags
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(tx, 0, true, false);
|
||||
ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags(tx, 0, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that if the second input is invalid, but the first input is
|
||||
// valid, the transaction is not cached.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user