Merge #18458: net: Add missing cs_vNodes lock

fa369651c5 net: Add missing cs_vNodes lock (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #18457

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    Code review ACK fa369651c5.
  laanwj:
    ACK fa369651c5

Tree-SHA512: 60d7000f2f3d480bb0953ce27a0020763e7102da16a0006b619e0a236cfc33cbd4f83d870e9f0546639711cd877c1f9808d419184bbc153bb328885417e0066c
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2020-04-06 20:38:30 +02:00
5 changed files with 31 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@@ -197,7 +197,20 @@ void Shutdown(NodeContext& node)
// Because these depend on each-other, we make sure that neither can be
// using the other before destroying them.
if (node.peer_logic) UnregisterValidationInterface(node.peer_logic.get());
if (node.connman) node.connman->Stop();
// Follow the lock order requirements:
// * CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers locks cs_main before indirectly calling GetExtraOutboundCount
// which locks cs_vNodes.
// * ProcessMessage locks cs_main and g_cs_orphans before indirectly calling ForEachNode which
// locks cs_vNodes.
// * CConnman::Stop calls DeleteNode, which calls FinalizeNode, which locks cs_main and calls
// EraseOrphansFor, which locks g_cs_orphans.
//
// Thus the implicit locking order requirement is: (1) cs_main, (2) g_cs_orphans, (3) cs_vNodes.
if (node.connman) {
node.connman->StopThreads();
LOCK2(::cs_main, ::g_cs_orphans);
node.connman->StopNodes();
}
StopTorControl();