make GetFirstStoredBlock assert that 'start_block' always has data

And transfer the responsibility of verifying whether 'start_block'
has data or not to the caller.

This is because the 'GetFirstStoredBlock' function responsibility
is to return the first block containing data. And the current
implementation can return 'start_block' when it has no data!. Which
is misleading at least.

Edge case behavior change:
Previously, if the block tip lacked data but all preceding blocks
contained data, there was no prune violation. And now, such
scenario will result in a prune violation.
This commit is contained in:
furszy
2023-06-16 17:32:21 -03:00
parent 430e7027a1
commit c82ef91eae
5 changed files with 40 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -812,9 +812,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan pruneblockchain()
PruneBlockFilesManual(active_chainstate, height);
const CBlockIndex& block{*CHECK_NONFATAL(active_chain.Tip())};
const CBlockIndex* last_block{active_chainstate.m_blockman.GetFirstStoredBlock(block)};
return static_cast<int64_t>(last_block->nHeight - 1);
return block.nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA ? active_chainstate.m_blockman.GetFirstStoredBlock(block)->nHeight - 1 : block.nHeight;
},
};
}
@@ -1267,7 +1265,8 @@ RPCHelpMan getblockchaininfo()
obj.pushKV("size_on_disk", chainman.m_blockman.CalculateCurrentUsage());
obj.pushKV("pruned", chainman.m_blockman.IsPruneMode());
if (chainman.m_blockman.IsPruneMode()) {
obj.pushKV("pruneheight", chainman.m_blockman.GetFirstStoredBlock(tip)->nHeight);
bool has_tip_data = tip.nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA;
obj.pushKV("pruneheight", has_tip_data ? chainman.m_blockman.GetFirstStoredBlock(tip)->nHeight : tip.nHeight + 1);
const bool automatic_pruning{chainman.m_blockman.GetPruneTarget() != BlockManager::PRUNE_TARGET_MANUAL};
obj.pushKV("automatic_pruning", automatic_pruning);