[net processing] Default initialize recentRejects

Now that recentRejects is owned by PeerManagerImpl, and
PeerManagerImpl's lifetime is managed by the node context, we can just
default initialize recentRejects during object initialization. We can
also remove the unique_ptr indirection.
This commit is contained in:
John Newbery
2021-03-31 18:40:47 +01:00
parent a28bfd1d4c
commit cd9902ac50

View File

@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ private:
* *
* Memory used: 1.3 MB * Memory used: 1.3 MB
*/ */
std::unique_ptr<CRollingBloomFilter> recentRejects GUARDED_BY(cs_main); CRollingBloomFilter recentRejects GUARDED_BY(::cs_main){120'000, 0.000'001};
uint256 hashRecentRejectsChainTip GUARDED_BY(cs_main); uint256 hashRecentRejectsChainTip GUARDED_BY(cs_main);
/* /*
@@ -1396,9 +1396,6 @@ PeerManagerImpl::PeerManagerImpl(const CChainParams& chainparams, CConnman& conn
m_mempool(pool), m_mempool(pool),
m_ignore_incoming_txs(ignore_incoming_txs) m_ignore_incoming_txs(ignore_incoming_txs)
{ {
// Initialize global variables that cannot be constructed at startup.
recentRejects.reset(new CRollingBloomFilter(120000, 0.000001));
// Blocks don't typically have more than 4000 transactions, so this should // Blocks don't typically have more than 4000 transactions, so this should
// be at least six blocks (~1 hr) worth of transactions that we can store, // be at least six blocks (~1 hr) worth of transactions that we can store,
// inserting both a txid and wtxid for every observed transaction. // inserting both a txid and wtxid for every observed transaction.
@@ -1601,14 +1598,13 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const BlockValidationSta
bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveTx(const GenTxid& gtxid) bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveTx(const GenTxid& gtxid)
{ {
assert(recentRejects);
if (m_chainman.ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != hashRecentRejectsChainTip) { if (m_chainman.ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != hashRecentRejectsChainTip) {
// If the chain tip has changed previously rejected transactions // If the chain tip has changed previously rejected transactions
// might be now valid, e.g. due to a nLockTime'd tx becoming valid, // might be now valid, e.g. due to a nLockTime'd tx becoming valid,
// or a double-spend. Reset the rejects filter and give those // or a double-spend. Reset the rejects filter and give those
// txs a second chance. // txs a second chance.
hashRecentRejectsChainTip = m_chainman.ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash(); hashRecentRejectsChainTip = m_chainman.ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash();
recentRejects->reset(); recentRejects.reset();
} }
const uint256& hash = gtxid.GetHash(); const uint256& hash = gtxid.GetHash();
@@ -1620,7 +1616,7 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveTx(const GenTxid& gtxid)
if (m_recent_confirmed_transactions->contains(hash)) return true; if (m_recent_confirmed_transactions->contains(hash)) return true;
} }
return recentRejects->contains(hash) || m_mempool.exists(gtxid); return recentRejects.contains(hash) || m_mempool.exists(gtxid);
} }
bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveBlock(const uint256& block_hash) bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveBlock(const uint256& block_hash)
@@ -2239,8 +2235,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessOrphanTx(std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set)
// See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034 // See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034
// for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes // for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes
// if we start doing this too early. // if we start doing this too early.
assert(recentRejects); recentRejects.insert(porphanTx->GetWitnessHash());
recentRejects->insert(porphanTx->GetWitnessHash());
// If the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD, // If the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD,
// then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy // then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy
// failure, since this check depends only on the txid // failure, since this check depends only on the txid
@@ -2252,7 +2247,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessOrphanTx(std::set<uint256>& orphan_work_set)
if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD && porphanTx->GetWitnessHash() != porphanTx->GetHash()) { if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD && porphanTx->GetWitnessHash() != porphanTx->GetHash()) {
// We only add the txid if it differs from the wtxid, to // We only add the txid if it differs from the wtxid, to
// avoid wasting entries in the rolling bloom filter. // avoid wasting entries in the rolling bloom filter.
recentRejects->insert(porphanTx->GetHash()); recentRejects.insert(porphanTx->GetHash());
} }
} }
m_orphanage.EraseTx(orphanHash); m_orphanage.EraseTx(orphanHash);
@@ -3255,7 +3250,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
std::sort(unique_parents.begin(), unique_parents.end()); std::sort(unique_parents.begin(), unique_parents.end());
unique_parents.erase(std::unique(unique_parents.begin(), unique_parents.end()), unique_parents.end()); unique_parents.erase(std::unique(unique_parents.begin(), unique_parents.end()), unique_parents.end());
for (const uint256& parent_txid : unique_parents) { for (const uint256& parent_txid : unique_parents) {
if (recentRejects->contains(parent_txid)) { if (recentRejects.contains(parent_txid)) {
fRejectedParents = true; fRejectedParents = true;
break; break;
} }
@@ -3296,8 +3291,8 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
// regardless of what witness is provided, we will not accept // regardless of what witness is provided, we will not accept
// this, so we don't need to allow for redownload of this txid // this, so we don't need to allow for redownload of this txid
// from any of our non-wtxidrelay peers. // from any of our non-wtxidrelay peers.
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetHash()); recentRejects.insert(tx.GetHash());
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetWitnessHash()); recentRejects.insert(tx.GetWitnessHash());
m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetHash()); m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetHash());
m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetWitnessHash()); m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetWitnessHash());
} }
@@ -3316,8 +3311,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
// See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034 // See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034
// for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes // for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes
// if we start doing this too early. // if we start doing this too early.
assert(recentRejects); recentRejects.insert(tx.GetWitnessHash());
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetWitnessHash());
m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetWitnessHash()); m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetWitnessHash());
// If the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD, // If the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD,
// then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy // then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy
@@ -3328,7 +3322,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
// transactions are later received (resulting in // transactions are later received (resulting in
// parent-fetching by txid via the orphan-handling logic). // parent-fetching by txid via the orphan-handling logic).
if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD && tx.GetWitnessHash() != tx.GetHash()) { if (state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD && tx.GetWitnessHash() != tx.GetHash()) {
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetHash()); recentRejects.insert(tx.GetHash());
m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetHash()); m_txrequest.ForgetTxHash(tx.GetHash());
} }
if (RecursiveDynamicUsage(*ptx) < 100000) { if (RecursiveDynamicUsage(*ptx) < 100000) {