Merge #19316: [net] Cleanup logic around connection types

01e283068b [net] Remove unnecessary default args on CNode constructor (Amiti Uttarwar)
bc5d65b3ca [refactor] Remove IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate (Amiti Uttarwar)
2f2e13b6c2 [net/refactor] Simplify multiple-connection checks (Amiti Uttarwar)
7f7b83deb2 [net/refactor] Rework ThreadOpenConnections logic (Amiti Uttarwar)
35839e963b [net] Fix bug where AddrFetch connections would be counted as outbound full relay (Amiti Uttarwar)
4972c21b67 [net/refactor] Clarify logic for selecting connections in ThreadOpenConnections (Amiti Uttarwar)
60156f5fc4 [net/refactor] Remove fInbound flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
7b322df629 [net/refactor] Remove m_addr_fetch member var from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
14923422b0 [net/refactor] Remove fFeeler flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
49efac5cae [net/refactor] Remove m_manual_connection flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
d3698b5ee3 [net/refactor] Add connection type as a member var to CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
46578c03e9 [doc] Describe different connection types (Amiti Uttarwar)
442abae2ba [net/refactor] Add AddrFetch connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
af59feb052 [net/refactor] Extract m_addr_known logic from initializer list (Amiti Uttarwar)
e1bc29812d [net/refactor] Add block relay only connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
0e52a659a2 [net/refactor] Add feeler connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
1521c47438 [net/refactor] Add manual connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
26304b4100 [net/refactor] Introduce an enum to distinguish type of connection (Amiti Uttarwar)
3f1b7140e9 scripted-diff: Rename OneShot to AddrFetch (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  **This is part 1 of #19315, which enables the ability to test `outbound` and `block-relay-only` connections from the functional tests.** Please see that PR for more information of overall functionality.

  **This PR simplifies how we manage different connection types.** It introduces an enum with the various types of connections so we can explicitly define the connection type. The existing system relies on a series of independent flags, then has asserts scattered around to ensure that conflicting flags are not enabled at the same time. I find this approach to be both brittle and confusing. While making these changes, I found a small bug due to the silent assumptions.

  This PR also proposes a rename from `OneShot` to `AddrFetch`. I find the name `OneShot` to be very confusing, especially when we also have `onetry` manual connections. Everyone I've talked to offline has agreed that the name is confusing, so I propose a potential alternative. I think this is a good opportunity for a rename since I'm creating an enum to explicitly define the connection types.
  (some context for the unfamiliar: `oneshot` or `addrfetch` connections are short-lived connections created on startup. They connect to the seed peers, send a `getaddr` to solicit addresses, then close the connection.)

  Overview of this PR:
  * rename `oneshot` to `addrfetch`
  * introduce `ConnectionType` enum
  * one by one, add different connection types to the enum
  * expose the `conn_type` on CNode, and use this to reduce reliance on flags (& asserts)
  * fix the bug in counting different type of connections
  * some additional cleanup to simplify logic and make expectations explicit/inclusive rather than implicit/exclusive.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    utACK 01e283068b
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 01e283068b, the commits are pretty straightforward to follow, and I think this is a move in the right direction overall
  vasild:
    ACK 01e283068
  sdaftuar:
    ACK 01e283068b.
  fanquake:
    ACK 01e283068b - I don't have as much experience with the networking code but these changes look fairly straight forward, the new code seems more robust/understandable and the additional documentation is great. I'm glad that a followup branch is already underway. There might be some more review comments here later today, so keep an eye on the discussion, however I'm going to merge this now.
  jb55:
    wow this code was messy before... ACK 01e283068b

Tree-SHA512: 7bb644a6ed5849913d777ebc2ff89133ca0fbef680355a9a344e07496a979e6f9ff21a958e8eea93dcd7d5c343682b0c7174b1a3de380a4247eaae73da436e15
This commit is contained in:
fanquake
2020-08-12 09:41:24 +08:00
9 changed files with 186 additions and 140 deletions

View File

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
// Mock an outbound peer
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::OUTBOUND);
dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman)
{
CAddress addr(ip(g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbits(32)), NODE_NONE);
vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false));
vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::OUTBOUND));
CNode &node = *vNodes.back();
node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
banman->ClearBanned();
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", true);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::INBOUND);
dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not discouraged
CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", true);
CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::INBOUND);
dummyNode2.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2);
dummyNode2.nVersion = 1;
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
SetMockTime(nStartTime); // Overrides future calls to GetTime()
CAddress addr(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 4, 4, CAddress(), "", true);
CNode dummyNode(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 4, 4, CAddress(), "", ConnectionType::INBOUND);
dummyNode.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode);
dummyNode.nVersion = 1;

View File

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t>& buffer)
return;
}
CDataStream random_bytes_data_stream{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeRemainingBytes<unsigned char>(), SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION};
CNode& p2p_node = *MakeUnique<CNode>(0, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS | NODE_BLOOM), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, CAddress{CService{in_addr{0x0100007f}, 7777}, NODE_NETWORK}, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, false).release();
CNode& p2p_node = *MakeUnique<CNode>(0, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS | NODE_BLOOM), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, CAddress{CService{in_addr{0x0100007f}, 7777}, NODE_NETWORK}, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, ConnectionType::OUTBOUND).release();
p2p_node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
p2p_node.nVersion = PROTOCOL_VERSION;
p2p_node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);

View File

@@ -44,9 +44,8 @@ void test_one_input(const std::vector<uint8_t>& buffer)
const auto num_peers_to_add = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange(1, 3);
for (int i = 0; i < num_peers_to_add; ++i) {
const ServiceFlags service_flags = ServiceFlags(fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegral<uint64_t>());
const bool inbound{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()};
const bool block_relay_only{fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()};
peers.push_back(MakeUnique<CNode>(i, service_flags, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, CAddress{CService{in_addr{0x0100007f}, 7777}, NODE_NETWORK}, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, inbound, block_relay_only).release());
const ConnectionType conn_type = fuzzed_data_provider.PickValueInArray({ConnectionType::INBOUND, ConnectionType::OUTBOUND, ConnectionType::MANUAL, ConnectionType::FEELER, ConnectionType::BLOCK_RELAY, ConnectionType::ADDR_FETCH});
peers.push_back(MakeUnique<CNode>(i, service_flags, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, CAddress{CService{in_addr{0x0100007f}, 7777}, NODE_NETWORK}, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, conn_type).release());
CNode& p2p_node = *peers.back();
p2p_node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;

View File

@@ -180,17 +180,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cnode_simple_test)
CAddress addr = CAddress(CService(ipv4Addr, 7777), NODE_NETWORK);
std::string pszDest;
bool fInboundIn = false;
// Test that fFeeler is false by default.
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode1 = MakeUnique<CNode>(id++, NODE_NETWORK, height, hSocket, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), pszDest, fInboundIn);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode1->fInbound == false);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode1->fFeeler == false);
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode1 = MakeUnique<CNode>(id++, NODE_NETWORK, height, hSocket, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), pszDest, ConnectionType::OUTBOUND);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode1->IsInboundConn() == false);
fInboundIn = true;
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode2 = MakeUnique<CNode>(id++, NODE_NETWORK, height, hSocket, addr, 1, 1, CAddress(), pszDest, fInboundIn);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode2->fInbound == true);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode2->fFeeler == false);
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode2 = MakeUnique<CNode>(id++, NODE_NETWORK, height, hSocket, addr, 1, 1, CAddress(), pszDest, ConnectionType::INBOUND);
BOOST_CHECK(pnode2->IsInboundConn() == true);
}
// prior to PR #14728, this test triggers an undefined behavior
@@ -214,7 +209,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ipv4_peer_with_ipv6_addrMe_test)
in_addr ipv4AddrPeer;
ipv4AddrPeer.s_addr = 0xa0b0c001;
CAddress addr = CAddress(CService(ipv4AddrPeer, 7777), NODE_NETWORK);
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode = MakeUnique<CNode>(0, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, false);
std::unique_ptr<CNode> pnode = MakeUnique<CNode>(0, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress{}, std::string{}, ConnectionType::OUTBOUND);
pnode->fSuccessfullyConnected.store(true);
// the peer claims to be reaching us via IPv6