Merge #13527: policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags

faa24441ec policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future.

Tree-SHA512: 3b897aa9604ac8d82ebe9573c6efd468c93ddaa08d378ebc902e247b7aa6c68fcde71e5b449c08f17a067146cdc66dc50a67ce06d07607c27e5189a49c3fba3f
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2018-08-07 15:33:02 +02:00
5 changed files with 29 additions and 42 deletions

View File

@@ -133,8 +133,11 @@ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(const CScript& sc
// Decide whether to include witness transactions
// This is only needed in case the witness softfork activation is reverted
// (which would require a very deep reorganization) or when
// -promiscuousmempoolflags is used.
// (which would require a very deep reorganization).
// Note that the mempool would accept transactions with witness data before
// IsWitnessEnabled, but we would only ever mine blocks after IsWitnessEnabled
// unless there is a massive block reorganization with the witness softfork
// not activated.
// TODO: replace this with a call to main to assess validity of a mempool
// transaction (which in most cases can be a no-op).
fIncludeWitness = IsWitnessEnabled(pindexPrev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) && fMineWitnessTx;