Merge #13269: refactoring: Drop UpdateTransaction in favor of UpdateInput

6aa33feadb Drop UpdateTransaction in favor of UpdateInput (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  Updating the input explicitly requires the caller to present a mutable
  input, which more clearly communicates the effects and intent of the call
  (and, often, the enclosing loop).

  In most cases, this input is already immediately available and need not be
  looked up.

Tree-SHA512: 8c7914a8b7ae975d8ad0e9d760e3c5da65776a5f79d060b8ffb6b3ff7a32235f71ad705f2185b368d9263742d7796bb562395d22b806d90e8502d8c496011e57
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2018-06-05 18:46:12 +02:00
7 changed files with 14 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static UniValue combinerawtransaction(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
}
}
UpdateTransaction(mergedTx, i, sigdata);
UpdateInput(txin, sigdata);
}
return EncodeHexTx(mergedTx);
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ UniValue SignTransaction(CMutableTransaction& mtx, const UniValue& prevTxsUnival
}
sigdata = CombineSignatures(prevPubKey, TransactionSignatureChecker(&txConst, i, amount), sigdata, DataFromTransaction(mtx, i));
UpdateTransaction(mtx, i, sigdata);
UpdateInput(txin, sigdata);
ScriptError serror = SCRIPT_ERR_OK;
if (!VerifyScript(txin.scriptSig, prevPubKey, &txin.scriptWitness, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, TransactionSignatureChecker(&txConst, i, amount), &serror)) {