[refactor] interfaces: Add missing LockAnnotation for cs_main

This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2019-04-19 13:19:20 -04:00
parent 14959753a4
commit fa3c651143
11 changed files with 55 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@@ -66,18 +66,27 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
// Test 1: block with both of those transactions should be rejected.
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
// Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[0]));
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
mempool.clear();
// Test 3: ... and should be rejected if spend2 is in the memory pool
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1]));
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
}
mempool.clear();
// Final sanity test: first spend in mempool, second in block, that's OK:
@@ -85,7 +94,10 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
oneSpend.push_back(spends[0]);
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1]));
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(oneSpend, scriptPubKey);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
}
// spends[1] should have been removed from the mempool when the
// block with spends[0] is accepted:
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(mempool.size(), 0U);