highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-11-13 15:39:05 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #15689: netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2

Browse Source 
8be3f3063 netaddress: Update CNetAddr for ORCHIDv2 (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  ```
  The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new
  ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not
  consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason
  to consider the new one to be either.
  ```

  Would like to know if people think this kind of thing is even worth keeping the codebase updated for. Perhaps it'd be nice to write a devtool to pull the csv from [here](https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml) and generate the code.

ACKs for commit 8be3f3:
  laanwj:
    utACK 8be3f3063
  ryanofsky:
    utACK 8be3f30633. Only change since last review is rebasing after #15718 merge.

Tree-SHA512: 7c93317f597b1a6c1443e12dd690010392edb9d72a479a8201970db7d3444fbb99a80b98026caad6fbfbebb455ab4035d2dde79bc9263bfd1d0398cd218392e1
This commit is contained in:
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-06-06 12:52:10 +02:00
parent 03858b23fe 8be3f30633
commit fc6cbc31e9
3 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
src/test/netbase_tests.cpp
View File

@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(netbase_properties)
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("FC00::").IsRFC4193());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001::2").IsRFC4380());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:10::").IsRFC4843());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("2001:20::").IsRFC7343());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("FE80::").IsRFC4862());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("64:FF9B::").IsRFC6052());
BOOST_CHECK(ResolveIP("FD87:D87E:EB43:edb1:8e4:3588:e546:35ca").IsTor());