f6d7636be4eb0b19878428906dd5e394df7d07a2 test: Treat `bitcoin-wallet` binary in the same way as others (Hennadii Stepanov)
dda961cec5fef318c0b043a09367d14daa87f089 test, refactor: Add `set_binary_paths` function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the `bitcoin-wallet` binary path customizable in the same way how it can be done now with other ones, including `bitcoind`, `bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-util`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK f6d7636be4eb0b19878428906dd5e394df7d07a2
Tree-SHA512: 480fae14c5440e530ba78a2be19eaaf642260070435e533fc7ab98ddcc2fcac7ad83f2c7e7c6706db3167e8391d7d4abf8784889796c218c2d5bba043144e787
c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4 test, init: perturb file to ensure failure instead of only deleting them (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
In `feature_init.py` there is a TODO about perturbing the files instead of only testing by deleting them.
```py
# TODO: at some point, we should test perturbing the files instead of removing
# them, e.g.
#
# contents = target_file.read_bytes()
# tweaked_contents = bytearray(contents)
# tweaked_contents[50:250] = b'1' * 200
# target_file.write_bytes(bytes(tweaked_contents))
#
# At the moment I can't get this to work (bitcoind loads successfully?) so
# investigate doing this later.
```
This PR adds it by writing into the file random bytes and checking whether it throws an error when starting.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4
Tree-SHA512: d691eee60b91dd9d1b200588608f56b0a10dccd9761a75254b69e0ba5e5866cae14d2f90cb2bd7ec0f95b0617c2562cd33f20892ffd16355b6df770d3806a0ff
This change makes the `bitcoin-wallet` binary path customizable in the
same way how it can be done now with other ones, including `bitcoind`,
`bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-util`.
7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5 test: add coverage to ensure the first arg of scantxoutset is needed (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Include a test that checks whether the first argument of scantxoutset RPC call "start" is required.
The rpc call should fail if the "start" argument is not provided.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5
Tree-SHA512: 6a456af9f3ccd5437be2edcd61936eb9f9c21ab926a6056c2c11b6b5121d1caca4e1f2ffd09015f9414af152c635a20e1da041eefdef980afbe8a0e8ccce07bd
afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc test: various `converttopsbt` check cleanups in rpc_psbt.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the functional test rpc_psbt.py, some comments around the `converttopsbt` RPC checks are wrong or outdated and can be removed:
> _Error could be either "TX decode failed" (segwit inputs causes
> parsing to fail) or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and
> scriptWitnesses"_
Decoding a valid TX with at least one input always succeeds with the [heuristic](e352f5ab6b/src/core_read.cpp (L126)), i.e. this comment is not right and we can assert for the error string "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" on the calls below.
> _We must set iswitness=True because the serialized transaction has
> inputs and is therefore a witness transaction_
This is also unneeded (and confusing, w.r.t. "is therefore a witness transaction"?), for a TX with one input there is no need to set the `iswitness` parameter. For sake of completeness, we still keep one variant where iswitness is explicitly set to true.
Lastly, there is a superflous `converttopsbt` call on the raw tx which is the same as just [about ~10 lines above](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py#L393-L397), so it can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
tested ACK afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc
achow101:
ACK afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc
Tree-SHA512: 467efefdb3f61efdb79145044b90fc8dc2f0c425f078117a99112b0074e7d4a32c34e464f665fbf8de70d06caaa5d4ad5908c1d75d2e7607eccb0837480afab3
fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1 test: Simplify feature_fastprune.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The goal of the test is a single regression check to see if a RPC times out. It shouldn't do more than calling the RPC (and the minimum work needed to get there).
Fix that by removing all blocktools imports and a `for` loop.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1
theStack:
ACK fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1
Tree-SHA512: c9c0154102199b250015ece53005a14d52d857dfa986f3b02a2cb899f16ac8e040d24eb826f35ba15e5ee22ee6a59bf8f74bb8d576b9a12ac6e888beeaaf81cc
710b83938ab5bbc4bd324d8b2e69461a2a1d2eec rpc: return block hash & height in getbalances, gettransaction & getwalletinfo JSONs (Harris)
Pull request description:
Reopens#18570 and closes#18567.
I have rebased the original PR.
Not sure why the original got closed as it was about to get merged.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 710b83938ab5bbc4bd324d8b2e69461a2a1d2eec
Tree-SHA512: d4478d990be98b1642e9ffb2930987f4a224e8bd64e2e35a5dda927a54c509ec9d712cd0eac35dc2bb89f00a1678e530ce14d7445f1dd93aa3a4cce2bc9b130d
24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c test: added coverage to rpc_scantxoutset.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort" is not the first command.
Relavant: mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27422
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c
theStack:
ACK 24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c
Tree-SHA512: 4b804235d3fa17c7bf492068ab47c1f87cb6cfc1a428c51e273ec059d3c41f581bcc467bb5d6d8bbf2fab14c60cd1c52a30c50009efe1c9b5adee70c88897ad9
82e6e3cae50d30b28b98f0cb7789c28e68170d5e test: add ripemd160 to test framework modules list (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160 module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`$ git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 82e6e3cae50d30b28b98f0cb7789c28e68170d5e
Tree-SHA512: 10940e215f728291c7149931a356bfc42795c098bda76d760dfa68f86443a3755e1cd35cb9a8a7b2f48880beb53f3bee3842de2d74bcadd45c7b05c13ff04203
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160
module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain
unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit
ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44).
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we
receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort"
is not the first command.
8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9 test: cover fastprune with excessive block size (Matthew Zipkin)
271c23e87f61276d7acab74e115b25a35144c8b4 blockstorage: Adjust fastprune limit if block exceeds blockfile size (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The debug-only `-fastprune` option used in several tests is not always safe to use:
If a `-fastprune` node receives a block larger than the maximum blockfile size of `64kb` bad things happen: The while loop in `BlockManager::FindBlockPos` never terminates, and the node runs oom because memory for `m_blockfile_info` is allocated in each iteration of the loop.
The same would happen if a naive user used `-fastprune` on anything other than regtest (so this can be tested by syncing on signet for example, the first block that crashes the node is at height 2232).
Change the approach by raising the blockfile size to the size of the block, if that block otherwise wouldn't fit (idea by TheCharlatan).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9. Added new assert, test, and comment since last review
TheCharlatan:
ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9
pinheadmz:
ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9
Tree-SHA512: df2fea30613ef9d40ebbc2416eacb574f6d7d96847db5c33dda22a29a2c61a8db831aa9552734ea4477e097f253dbcb6dcb1395d43d2a090cc0588c9ce66eac3
dc14ba08e6e502f3e31d935bcd053a287c6610ca test: remove modinv python util helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Since #27483 was merged the `modinv()` body is just one line calling pythons own implementation of `pow()`. We can just remove the function as it doesn't seem to add any value. Additionally the comment in the function is now outdated and the test is only testing two ways of doing modular inverse but both using python's `pow()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK dc14ba08e6e502f3e31d935bcd053a287c6610ca
Tree-SHA512: e8b470c72dc3f9fd53699d0684650517b1ea35ad1d4c01cf9472c80d3e4474c0c72e429c0bd201eb99d204c87eee0d68285e6a388e4c506f30e14b2bff9c1c32
057057a2d7e23c2e29cbfd29a5124b3947a33757 Add test for `sendmany` rpc that uses `subtractfeefrom` parameter (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test that uses `sendmany` rpc to send **BTC** to multiple addresses using `subtractfeefrom` parameter, then checks receiver addresses balances to make sure fees are subtracted correctly.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 057057a2d7e23c2e29cbfd29a5124b3947a33757
Tree-SHA512: 51167120d489f0ff7b8b9855424d07cb55a8965984f904643cddf45e7a08c350eaded498c350ec9c660edf72c2f128ec142347c9c79d5043d9f6cd481b15cd7e
9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77 test: add coverage for `-bantime` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `-bantime`. This flag sets the time in seconds how long the IP is banned (in the case you don't explicitly set `bantime` when using `setban`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77
Tree-SHA512: e95f8608aa5df9b09cc5577daae662ed79ef5d5c69ee5e704d7c69520b9b51cc142e9e6be69d80356eda25a5215c4770b1a208638560c48cd3bc8f6d195a371f
b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7 rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result obj (furszy)
ce50acc54fa313a92d48ed03e46ce8aabcf267e5 rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by block (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23549#pullrequestreview-1105712566
The current `scanblocks` flow walks-through every block in the active chain
until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange`
function to obtain all filters from that particular range.
This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block
filters. Which is unneeded.
As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can
directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip,
without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7
TheCharlatan:
ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7
Tree-SHA512: 0587e6d9cf87a59184adb2dbc26a4e2bce3a16233594c6c330f69feb49bf7dc63fdacf44fc20308e93441159ebc604c63eb7de19204d3e745a2ff16004892b45
be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0 test: bumpfee, add coverage for "send coins back to yourself" (furszy)
7bffec6715a75bb2c8631177d39f984aabc656ba bumpfee: enable send coins back to yourself (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple example:
1) User_1 sends 0.1 btc to user_2 on a low fee transaction.
2) After few hours, the tx is still in the mempool, user_2
is not interested anymore, so user_1 decides to cancel
it by sending coins back to himself.
3) User_1 has the bright idea of opening the explorer and
copy the change output address of the transaction. Then
call bumpfee providing such output (in the "outputs" arg).
Currently, this is not possible. The wallet fails with
"Unable to create transaction. Transaction must have at least
one recipient" error.
The error reason is because we discard the provided output
from the recipients list and set it inside the coin control
so the process adds it later (when the change is calculated).
But.. there is no later if the tx has no outputs.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0
achow101:
ACK be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0
Tree-SHA512: c2c38290a998f9b426a830d9624c7feb730158980ac186f8fb0138d5e200935d6538307bc60a2c3d0b7b6ee2b4ffb77a1e98baf8feb1d20a7d825f6055ac377f
To tell the user whether the process was aborted or not.
Plus, as the process can be aborted prior to the end range,
have also changed the "to_height" result value to return the
last scanned block instead of the end range block.
fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3 ci: Bump ci/lint/Dockerfile (MarcoFalke)
fa6eb6516727a8675dc6e46634d8343e282528ab test: Use python3.8 pow() (MarcoFalke)
88881cf7ac029aea660c2413ca8e2a5136fcd41b Bump python minimum version to 3.8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no pressing reason to drop support for 3.7, however there are several maintenance issues:
* There is no supported operating system that ships 3.7 by default. (debian:buster is EOL and unmaintained to the extent that it doesn't run in the CI environment. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27340#issuecomment-1484988445)
* Compiling python 3.7 from source is also unsupported on at least macos, according to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24017#issuecomment-1107820790
* Recent versions of lief require 3.8, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27507#issuecomment-1517561645
Fix all maintenance issues by bumping the minimum.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
ACK fac395e
fjahr:
ACK fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3
fanquake:
ACK fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3
Tree-SHA512: c198decdbbe29d186d73ea3f6549d8a38479383495d14a965a2f9211ce39637b43f13a4c2a5d3bf56e2d468be4bbe49b4ee8e8e19ec69936ff43ddf2b714c712
33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f test: perturb anchors.dat to test it doesn't throw an error during initialization (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Got some inspiration from `feature_init`. This PR tests whether perturbing `anchors.dat` doesn't throw any error during initialization.
3f1f5f6f1e/src/addrdb.cpp (L223-L235)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f
Tree-SHA512: e6584debb37647677581fda08366b45b42803022cc4c4f1d5a7bd5e9e04d64da77656dad2b804855337487bdcfc891f300a2e03668d6122de769dd14f39af9ed
4bdcf571584cbe44ad5533a3c991d3b0b4b2c84f test: test banlist database recreation (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for 'banlist database recreation'. If it wasn't able to read ban db (in `LoadBanlist`), so it should create a new (an empty, ofc) one.
d8bdee0fc8/src/banman.cpp (L28-L45)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4bdcf571584cbe44ad5533a3c991d3b0b4b2c84f
Tree-SHA512: d9d0cd0c4b3797189dff00d3a634878188e7cf51e78346601fc97e2bf78c495561705214062bb42ab8e491e0d111f8bfcf74dbc801768bc02cf2b45f162aad85
cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189 test: add coverage for rpc error when trying to rescan beyond pruned data (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following rpc error:
15692e2641/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L896-L899)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
aureleoules:
ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
Tree-SHA512: 724a055e9f6cddf1935699e8769015115f24f6485a0bd87e8660072ee44a15c1bddfdda848acc101ea7184b7e65a33b5b0d80b563d2ba3ecdab7a631378d6476
0c520679ab5f0ba99584cb356ec28ef089f14735 doc: add release notes for `abandoned` field in `gettransaction` and `listtransactions` (brunoerg)
a1aaa7f51f4205ae4d27fbceb2c3a97bc114e828 rpc, wallet: add `abandoned` field for all categories of transactions in ListTransactions (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25130
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 0c520679ab5f0ba99584cb356ec28ef089f14735
Tree-SHA512: 1864460d76decab7898737c96517d722055eb8f81ca52248fe1035723258c6cd4a93251e06a86ecbbb0b0a80af1466b2c86fb142ace4ccb74cc40d5dc3967d7f
bf77fc9cb45209b9c560208c65abc94209cd7919 [test] mempool full in package accept (glozow)
b51ebccc28e66c1822ab22d2d178be55c6618196 [validation] set PackageValidationState when mempool full (glozow)
563a2ee4f564c8ea5f8313d711b196e260568c04 [policy] disallow transactions under min relay fee, even in packages (glozow)
c4554fe894d7af8e666f5d424deccddf516713ef [test] package cpfp bumps parents <mempoolminfee but >=minrelaytxfee (glozow)
ac463e87df728689701810c3961155c49fdc5b31 [test util] mock mempool minimum feerate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Part of package relay, see #27463.
Note that this still allows packages to bump transactions that are below the dynamic mempool minimum feerate, which means this still solves the "mempool is congested and my presigned 1sat/vB tx is screwed" problem for all transactions.
On master, the package policy (only accessible through regtest-only RPC submitpackage) allows 0-fee (or otherwise below min relay feerate) transactions if they are bumped by a child. However, with default package limits, we don't yet have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring these transactions remain bumped throughout their time in the mempool. Primarily, the fee-bumping child may later be replaced by another transaction that doesn't bump the parent(s). The parent(s) could potentially stay bumped by other transactions, but not enough to ever be selected by the `BlockAssembler` (due to `blockmintxfee`).
For example, (tested [here](https://github.com/glozow/bitcoin/commits/26933-motivation)):
- The mempool accepts 24 below-minrelayfeerate transactions ("0-fee parents"), all bumped by a single high-fee transaction ("the fee-bumping child"). The fee-bumping child also spends a confirmed UTXO.
- Two additional children are added to each 0-fee parent. These children each pay a feerate slightly above the minimum relay feerate (e.g. 1.9sat/vB) such that, for each 0-fee parent, the total fees of its two children divided by the total size of the children and parent is above the minimum relay feerate.
- If a block template is built now, all transactions would be selected.
- A transaction replaces the the fee-bumping child, spending only the confirmed UTXO and not any of the outputs from the 0-fee parents.
- The 0-fee parents now each have 2 children. Their descendant feerates are above minrelayfeerate, which means that they remain in the mempool, even if the mempool evicts all below-minrelayfeerate packages.
- If a block template is built now, none of the 0-fee parents or their children would be selected.
- Even more low-feerate descendants can be added to these below-minrelayfeerate packages and they will not be evicted until they expire or the mempool reaches capacity.
Unless we have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring package CPFP-bumped transactions are always bumped, allowing package CPFP to bump below-minrelayfeerate transactions can result in these problematic situations. See #27018 which proposes a partial solution with some limitations, and contains discussion about potential improvements to eviction strategy. While no adequate solution exists, for now, avoid these situations by requiring all transactions to meet min relay feerate.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
reACK bf77fc9cb45209b9c560208c65abc94209cd7919
instagibbs:
re-ACK bf77fc9cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28940f41493a9e280b010284316fb8caf1ed7b2090ba9a4ef8a3b2eafc5933601074b142f4f7d4e3c6c4cce99d3146f5c8e1393d9406c6f2070dd41c817985c9
These routines look fancy, but do nothing more than converting between
byte objects of length 32 to/from integers in little endian byte order
and can be replaced by simple one-liners, using the int.{from,to}_bytes
methods (available since Python 3.2).
6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam)
a5b4883fb43d01bfef1244df62c64bf8691ca63a rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98
Xekyo:
ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98
Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6 move-only: Extract common/args and common/config.cpp from util/system (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". It is part of a series of patches splitting up the `util/system` files. Its preceding pull request is https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254.
The pull request contains an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system into their own common/ file.
The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on it. See [doc/design/libraries.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/design/libraries.md) for more information on this rationale.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6 🚲
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6. Just small cleanups since the last review.
hebasto:
ACK be55f545d53d44fdcf2d8ae802e9eae551d120c6, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 90eb03334af0155b823030b4f2ecf286d35058d700ee2ddbbaa445be19e31eb0fe982656f35bd14ecee3ad2c3d0db3746855cb8f3777eff7253713e42873e111
* The GCC suppression was fixed in gcc-11, which is available on all LTS
releases of Linux distros.
* The feerate suppression was likely fixed and does not trigger anymore.
If it was to trigger again, the underlying bug should be fixed instead
of suppressing it.
* The bench suppression does not trigger anymore.
Also, add comments to tsan suppressions on how to reproduce.
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system
into their own common file.
Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp.
The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the
libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs
into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on
it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
Prior to PR #27468 (commit 11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc) all
call-sites of `GetQueryParameter(...)` in the REST module could trigger
a crash. Add missing test cases for all possible code-paths as a
regression test, as a foundation for possible follow-up fixes (which aim
to resolve this issue in a more general and robust way).
e07dd5fff9eb64d7615ab515b351e296c00b1861 test: fix bumpfee 'spend_one_input' occasional failure (furszy)
Pull request description:
CI test failure, in master: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5975232842825728.
In #27469https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6452468402356224
Most of the subtests in `wallet_bumpfee.py` expect to find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet. They use the `spend_one_input()` method which fails if none of them exist.
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added `test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs` subtest that can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e07dd5fff9eb64d7615ab515b351e296c00b1861
pablomartin4btc:
ACK e07dd5fff9.
Tree-SHA512: c150ed6fcfbb6f1502eaf6370a57aae0da991c0fc48e8bb3d446805f4336abba5d80ff0de26094914da95432dd0255030fe527001af4510dfdcefbc7230f14d6
11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc bugfix: rest: avoid segfault for invalid URI (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Minimal fix to get it promptly into 25.0 release (suggested by [stickies-v](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27253#pullrequestreview-1385130381) and supported by [vasild](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27253#pullrequestreview-1385842606) )
Please check #27253 for reviewers comments and acks regarding this PR and read the commit comment message body for more details about the fix.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc
stickies-v:
re-ACK 11422cc
Tree-SHA512: 5af6b53fb266a12b463f960910556d5e97bc88b3c2a4f437ffa343886b38749e1eb058cf7bc64d62e82e1acf6232a186bddacd8f3b4500c87bf9e550a0153386
`evhttp_uri_parse` can return a nullptr, for example when the URI
contains invalid characters (e.g. "%").
`GetQueryParameterFromUri` passes the output of `evhttp_uri_parse`
straight into `evhttp_uri_get_query`, which means that anyone calling
a REST endpoint in which query parameters are used (e.g. `rest_headers`)
can cause a segfault.
This bugfix is designed to be minimal and without additional behaviour change.
Follow-up work should be done to resolve this in a more general and robust way,
so not every endpoint has to handle it individually.
Most of the subtests in wallet_bumpfee.py expect to
find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet
(they use the 'spend_one_input()' method that tries
to spend one of them and if it doesn't find any, it
throws an exception).
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added
'test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs' subtest that
can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with
no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case
into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
d52fa1b0a5a8eecbe1e296a44b72965717e9235b tests: Make sure that bumpfee feerate checks work when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
be177c15a40199fac79d8ab96bb4b4d5a9b4fe22 bumpfee: Check the correct feerate when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When replacing the outputs of a transaction during `bumpfee`, it is possible to accidentally create a transaction that will not be accepted into the mempool as it does not meet the incremental relay fee requirements. This occurs because the size estimation used for checking the provided feerate does not account for the replaced outputs; it instead uses the original outputs. When the replaced outputs is significantly different from the original, there can be a large difference in estimated transaction sizes that can make a transaction miss the absolute fee requirements for the incremental relay fee. Unfortunately we do not currently inform the user when the bumped transaction fails to relay, so they could use `bumpfee` and think the transaction has been bumped when it actually has not.
This issue is resolved by replacing the outputs before doing the size estimation, and also updating the feerate checker to use the actual fee values when calculating the required minimum fee.
Also added a test for this scenario.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK d52fa1b0a5a8eecbe1e296a44b72965717e9235b
Xekyo:
reACK d52fa1b0a5
Tree-SHA512: d18301b587465322dd3fb1bb86496c3675265a56072047576e2baa5cf907dd3b54778f30721f662f0c235709a5568427c18542eb7efbfb6fdd9f481fe676c66b
7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 test: fix importmulti/importdescriptors assertion (Jon Atack)
19d888ce407f44d90785c456a1a3e2a6870e9245 rpc: move WALLET_FLAG_CAVEATS to the compilation unit of its caller (Jon Atack)
01df011ca2bf46ee4c988b03a130eea6df692325 doc: release note for wallet RPCs "warning" field deprecation (Jon Atack)
9ea8b3739a863b0ad87593639476b3cd712ff0dc test: createwallet "warning" field deprecation test (Jon Atack)
645d7f75ac1b40e4ea88119b3711f89943d35d6c rpc: deprecate "warning" field in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
2f4a926e95e0379397859c3ba1b5711be5f09925 test: add test coverage for "warnings" field in createwallet (Jon Atack)
4a1e479ca612056761e6247dd5b715dcd6824413 rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
079d8cdda8eeebe199fb6592fca2630c37662731 rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helper (Jon Atack)
f73782a9032a462a71569e9424db9bf9eeababf3 doc: fix/improve warning helps in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Based on discussion and concept ACKed in #27138, add a `warnings` field to RPCs createwallet, loadwallet, unloadwallet, and restorewallet as a JSON array of strings to replace the `warning` string field in these 4 RPCs. The idea is to more gracefully handle multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs. Then, deprecate the latter fields, which represent all the remaining RPC `warning` fields.
The first commit f73782a903 implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27138#issuecomment-1474789198 as an alternative to #27138. One of those two could potentially be backported to our currently supported releases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
1440000bytes:
utACK 7ccdd741fe
vasild:
ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
Tree-SHA512: 314e0a4c41fa383d95e2817bfacf359d449e460529d235c3eb902851e2f4eacbabe646d9a5a4beabc4964cdfabf6397ed8301366a58d344a2f787f83b75e9d64
Instead of storing and passing around fixed strings for the purpose of
an address, use an enum.
This also rationalizes the CAddressBookData struct, documenting all fields and
making them public, and simplifying the representation to avoid bugs like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26761#discussion_r1134615114 and make
it not possible to invalid address data like change addresses with labels.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
