24f93c9af7 release note (Pol Espinasa)
331a5279d2 wallet, rpc:remove settxfee and paytxfee (Pol Espinasa)
Pull request description:
**Summary**
This PR removes the settxfee RPC and paytxfee setting (Bitcoin Core 31.0).
These two features were deprecated in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31278.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 24f93c9af7
w0xlt:
reACK 24f93c9af7
Tree-SHA512: e090f1a72ba2cbeba7c982dd51dfdcf6baf0a164827337cf56fd85f733e143b8d6116b8cd53c59c812cacef193dfa0b101a830fc455e32bf225e8505e7b2a554
- Introduce a `FeeRateFormat` enum and change `CFeeRate::ToString()`
to use it for `BTC/kvB` vs `sat/vB` output formatting.
- Handle all enum values, hence remove default case in `CFeeRate::ToString()`
and `assert(False)` when a `FeeRateFormat` value is not handled.
- Keep `FeeEstimateMode` focused on fee estimation behavior by removing fee rate format
values from `FeeEstimateMode`.
- Update all formatting call sites and tests to pass `FeeRateFormat` explicitly, separating fee rate format
from fee-estimation mode selection.
4c0d4f6f93 refactor: interfaces, make 'createTransaction' less error-prone (furszy)
e2c3ec9bf4 refactor: move CreatedTransactionResult to types.h (furszy)
45372175c3 gui: remove AmountWithFeeExceedsBalance error special case (furszy)
Pull request description:
Bundle all function's outputs inside the `util::Result` returned object.
Removals:
- The input-output 'change_pos' ref arg from `createTransaction`, which has been a source of bugs in the past.
- The 'fee' ref arg from `createTransaction`, which is currently only set when the transaction creation process succeeds.
- The no longer needed `AmountWithFeeExceedsBalance` error (more info about its re-introduction at [bitcoin#25269](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269) and [bitcoin#34299](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34299).
Additionally, this PR moves the `CreatedTransactionResult` struct into its own file. This change is made to avoid further expanding the GUI dependencies on `wallet.h`. Structurally, the GUI should only access the model/interfaces and never the wallet directly.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK 4c0d4f6.
hebasto:
ACK 4c0d4f6f93.
Tree-SHA512: 4fc61f08ca2e66e46001defb3a2e852265713e75006c98f0c465bd48afe42e7b0d626d28d578741906fdd26e907d6919f06dc640c55c44efc3dfa766fdbf38a4
fa6801366d refactor: [rpc] Remove confusing and brittle integral casts (take 2) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Second take for cases which I seem to have missed in commit 94ddc2dced.
When constructing an UniValue from integral values, historically (long ago), in some cases casts where needed. With the current UniValue constructor, only very few are actually needed.
Keeping the unused casts around is:
* confusing, because code readers do not understand why they are needed
* brittle, because some may copy them into new places, where they will lead to hard-to-find logic bugs, such as the ones fixed in pull https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34112
So fix all issues by removing them, except for a few cases, where casting was required:
* `static_cast<bool>(fCoinBase)`, because `bool{fCoinBase}` only works on modern compilers.
This hardening refactor does not fix any bugs and does not change any behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK fa6801366d
sedited:
ACK fa6801366d
Tree-SHA512: 77f03f496ea2a42987720cb4a36eb4e7a0d5b512ed7f029e41dd54c04fb4c1680f7cc13514acbc9f1bae991be4de3cf31c5a0d27c016a030f5749d132603f71e
fa0677d131 refactor: Use SpanReader over DataStream (MarcoFalke)
fad3eb3956 refactor: Use SpanReader over DataStream (MarcoFalke)
fa06e26764 refactor: [qt] Use SpanReader to avoid two vector copies (MarcoFalke)
fabd4d2e2e refactor: Avoid UB in SpanReader::ignore (MarcoFalke)
fa20bc2ec2 refactor: Use empty() over eof() in the streams interface (MarcoFalke)
fa879db735 test: Read debug log for self-checking comment (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes all places, where possible, to use SpanReader over DataStream. This makes the code easier to read and reason about, because `SpanReader` can never write data. Also, the code should be minimally faster, because it avoids a full redundant copy of the whole vector of bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa0677d131
achow101:
ACK fa0677d131
janb84:
re ACK fa0677d131
sipa:
crACK fa0677d131
Tree-SHA512: 1d9f43fc6e71d481cf7b8f8457f479745ee331734649e9e2c2ab00ce5d317112796c77afc328612ed004e65ac5c16fc92279d760cfb012cfddce9098c4af810f
Bundle all function's outputs inside the util::Result returned object.
Reasons for the refactoring:
- The 'change_pos' ref argument has been a source of bugs in the past.
- The 'fee' ref argument is currently only set when the transaction creation process succeeds.
48161f6a05 wallet: introduce "tx amount exceeds balance when fees are included" error (stratospher)
b7fa609ed1 wallet: remove PreSelectedInputs (stratospher)
7819da2c16 walllet: use CoinsResult instead of PreSelectedInputs (stratospher)
e5474079f1 wallet: introduce GetAppropriateTotal() in CoinsResult (stratospher)
d8ea921d01 wallet: correctly reserve in CoinsResult::All() (stratospher)
7072d825e3 wallet: ensure COutput added in set are unique (stratospher)
fefa3be782 wallet: fix, make 'total_effective_amount' optional actually optional (stratospher)
Pull request description:
picks up https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269.
This PR re-implements the code path so that an error message is thrown when a transaction's total amount (including fees) exceeds the available balance. It also refactors the wallet's coin selection code.
1. the first 3 commits are unrelated to the code but few small bug fixes which are nice to fix. but also kind of impacts the remaining logic. (could PR separately if reviewers wish)
1. c467325aaf187d7f056bb1ea1cec6b7c4250af2e: make `total_effective_amount` optional actually optional
2. 2202ab597596c84fc49f8784e823372b7a9efcbe: ensure `set<shared_ptr<COutput>>` has unique COutput
3. a5ffbbf122d66fc4ad9b2e7c6d7d1dfa1816388e: Correctly reserve size when flattening `CoinsResult.coins` map to vector
3. the next 3 commits from 4745d5480ca5c3809edd51140e4d2c0433582844 replace the `PreSelectedInputs` struct with `CoinsResult` and removes `PreSelectedInputs`.
4. the last commit (e664484a6d34c1795ebb0925ab31faea5d64ab00) deals with the error message - `AmountWithFeeExceedsBalance` error inside `WalletModel::prepareTransaction` is never thrown and remains an unused code path. This is because `createTransaction` does not retrieve the fee when the process fails. The fee return arg is set only at the end of the process, when the transaction is successfully created. Therefore, if the transaction creation fails, the fee is not available inside `WalletModel::prepareTransaction` to trigger the `AmountWithFeeExceedsBalance` error.
This PR re-implements the feature inside `CreateTransactionInternal` and adds test coverage for it.
| on master | on PR |
|-----------|-------|
| <img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a903e687-2466-42c7-b898-5dec24bfe515" width="750" alt="Insufficient funds" /> | <img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74bb3c83-6132-4c09-91f0-0a446618b3c8" width="750" alt="AmountWithFeeExceedsBalance" /> |
the unreachable code path is removed in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/807 which requires this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 48161f6a05
furszy:
utACK 48161f6
Tree-SHA512: a963fac8d6714f76571df8cf9aff70601536dc6faa4326fbb5892c3f080dc393f0d7c6e2d21879c7a2c898bf0092adb154376d9b0a8929b31575ce9d1d47dec2
PreSelectedInputs is confusing to use. it's `total_amount`
might store total amount or effective amount based on SFFO.
ex: we might accidentally sum preselected inputs effective
amount (named `total_amount`) with automatically selected
inputs actual total amount.
CoinsResult has a cleaner interface with separate fields
for both these amounts.
2 behavioural changes:
1. no more default assert error if effective value is unset
- previously PreSelectedInputs::Insert() called
COutput::GetEffectiveValue() which assert failed
if the optional was unset.
- now we don't default assert anymore.
* in GUI/getAvailableBalance better not to assert.
* SelectCoins's preselected inputs always contain a
feerate, so effective amount should be set.
explicitly added an assertion to ensure this.
2. FetchSelectedInputs uses OutputType::UNKNOWN as key to
populate CoinsResult's coins map. it's discarded later.
This refactor does not change behavior. However, it avoids a vector
copy, which can lead to a minimal speed-up of 1%-5%, depending on the
call-site. This is mostly relevant for the fuzz tests and utils that
read large blobs of data (like a full block).
returns the total amount (if SFFO), otherwise the effective amount.
previously, this was the logic in calculating
PreSelectedInputs::total_amount when PreSelectedInputs::Insert()
was called.
return optional to force callers to explicitly handle the case
when effective amount optional is not set.
coins.size() would be the number of the OutputType keys in the map.
whereas Size() would return total number of COutput objects when
flattening the map.
before #25806, set<COutput> was used and would not
contain same COutputs in the set.
now we use set<shared_ptr<COutput>> and it might be
possible for 2 distinct shared_ptr (different pointer
address but same COutputs) to be added into the set.
so preserve previous behaviour by making sure values
in the set are also distinct
54d0393058 FUZZ: Test that BnB finds best solution (Murch)
Pull request description:
BnB’s solution is the input set with the lowest waste score, excluding any supersets of other solution candidates.
This fuzz test compares a brute force search with the BnB result to ensure that BnB succeeds.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 54d0393058
brunoerg:
ACK 54d0393058
Tree-SHA512: 96b6a822f53311d9a76abe8c217794e0a2dd5bd713db0a15dc70e065099b8245c430e1174e24133e0a802218ff0f2943dfcc3d638c3716485d5607c452854e7d
BnB’s solution is the input set with the lowest waste score, excluding
any supersets of other solution candidates.
This fuzz test compares a brute force search with the BnB result to
ensure that BnB succeeds.
db2effaca4 scripted-diff: refactor: CWallet::Create() -> CreateNew() (David Gumberg)
27e021ebc0 wallet: Correctly log stats for encrypted messages. (David Gumberg)
d8bec61be2 wallet: remove loading logic from CWallet::Create (David Gumberg)
f35acc893f refactor: wallet: Factor out `WriteVersion()` from `PopulateWalletFromDB()` (David Gumberg)
e12ff8aca0 test: wallet: Split create and load (David Gumberg)
70dbc79b09 wallet: Use CWallet::LoadExisting() for loading existing wallets. (David Gumberg)
ae66e01164 wallet: Create separate function for wallet load (David Gumberg)
bc69070416 refactor: Wallet stats logging in its own function (David Gumberg)
a9d64cd49c wallet: Remove redundant birth time update (David Gumberg)
b4a49cc727 wallet: Move argument parsing to before DB load (David Gumberg)
b15a94a618 refactor: Split out wallet argument loading (David Gumberg)
a02c4a82d8 refactor: Move -walletbroadcast setting init (David Gumberg)
411caf7281 wallet: refactor: PopulateWalletFromDB use switch statement. (David Gumberg)
a48e23f566 refactor: wallet: move error handling to PopulateWalletFromDB() (David Gumberg)
0972785fd7 wallet: Delete unnecessary PopulateWalletFromDB() calls (David Gumberg)
f0a046094e scripted-diff: refactor: CWallet::LoadWallet->PopulateWalletFromDB (David Gumberg)
Pull request description:
This PR is mostly a refactor which splits out logic used for creating wallets and for loading wallets, both of which are presently contained in `CWallet::Create()` into `CWallet::CreateNew()` and `CWallet::LoadExisting()`
The real win of this PR is that `CWallet::Create()` uses a very bad heuristic for trying to guess whether or not it is supposed to be creating a new wallet or loading an existing wallet:
370c592612/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L2882-L2885)
This heuristic assumes that wallets with no `ScriptPubKeyMans` are being created, which sounds reasonable, but as demonstrated in #32112 and #32111, this can happen when the user tries to load a wallet file that is corrupted, both issues are fixed by this PR and any other misbehavior for wallet files which succeeded the broken heuristic's sniff test for new wallets.
It was already the case that every caller of `CWallet::Create()` knows whether it is creating a wallet or loading one, so we can avoid replacing this bad heuristic with another one, and just shift the burden to the caller.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK db2effaca4
polespinasa:
approach ACK db2effaca4
w0xlt:
reACK db2effaca4
murchandamus:
ACK db2effaca4
rkrux:
ACK db2effaca4
Tree-SHA512: c28d60e0a3001058da3fd2bdbe0726c7ebe742a4b900a1dee2e5132eccc22e49619cb747a99b4032b000eafd4aa2fdd4ec244c32be2012aba809fdc94b5f6ecd
b189a34557 test: add case where `TOTAL_TRIES` is exceeded yet solution remains (yancy)
Pull request description:
Show that `CoinGrider` halts searching when the number of attempts exceeds `TOTAL_TRIES`. To do so, show that a solution is found, then add one more entry to the same set of inputs. Since the search orders by `effective_value`, the solution is constructed such that only values with the lowest `effective_value` have the least weight. Only the lowest weight values will not exceed the `max_selection_weight`. Therefore, `CoinGrinder` will not evaluate all lowest weight solutions together before exceeding `TOTAL_TRIES` since they are last found.
This test case was inspired by a similar test for `BnB` currently named `bnb_test`.
ACKs for top commit:
frankomosh:
Code review ACK b189a34
achow101:
ACK b189a34557
murchandamus:
ACK b189a34557
Tree-SHA512: 1df0b6e29ae219edbeed14cfa97f0ad4688d6bf97ed946719ba3c3b69e004f3dee82991578eb5aceb554914b70c5b68feff9e321283c1fc8bc0fedf08df2cb4c
On Windows, the `winnt.h` header defines `DELETE` as a macro for a
"Standard Access Right" bitmask (0x00010000L).
This introduces a fragile dependency on header inclusion order: if
Windows headers happen to be included before this enum definition,
the preprocessor expands `DELETE` into a numeric literal, causing
syntax errors.
Rename the enumerator to `DELETE_FLAG` to remove this fragility and
avoid the collision entirely.
fad042235b refactor: Remove remaining std::bind, check via clang-tidy (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`std::bind` has many issues:
* It is verbose in a meaningless way
* Overriden args are silently accepted and dropped at runtime without a compile error. Same for accidental duplicates.
One could use `std::bind_front` similar to commit fa267551c4. Though, I think the remaining cases are better off with lambdas.
So do that here, and enable the `modernize-avoid-bind` clang-tidy rule to avoid `std::bind` bugs in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK fad042235b
purpleKarrot:
Code review ACK fad042235b
Tree-SHA512: 38b17e26eda3ae47d84a8c34298309dc1eeb4ed434fda58b5803ef031c4c2edfb17222f5208f37af727bf340e32b37c7f81784f461d2b65fbc6227f3cd53eea4
1f60ca360e wallet: fix removeprunedfunds bug with conflicting transactions (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`removeprunedfunds` removes all entries from `mapTxSpends` for the inputs of the pruned tx. However, this is incorrect, because there could be multiple entries from conflicting transactions (that shouldn't be removed as well). This could lead to the wallet creating invalid transactions, trying to double spend utxos.
The bug persists when the conflicting tx was mined, because the wallet trusts its internal accounting instead of calling `AddToSpends` again.
The added test should fail on master.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1f60ca360e
fjahr:
tACK 1f60ca360e
furszy:
utACK 1f60ca360e
vasild:
ACK 1f60ca360e
Tree-SHA512: 3cc9ed547530fd53e25721177b76ab2e1eae16ce2c0e63fc01b20fdbf8bd02655dae51167ad56f9dec748d34c61ce65d38f993370820601f8257c73b876a3347
3400db8040 doc: add missing param description to SRD (yancy)
Pull request description:
The params documentation is missing `change_fee` and the description is lacking recent changes.
ACKs for top commit:
murchandamus:
ACK 3400db8040
brunoerg:
code review ACK 3400db8040
Tree-SHA512: 8f6fac0d92873c5c9f77b19fbc0c6ecfb425b2a6b3d5f5ad69c82ed706b21cf4627e68c71acbc43661000e6063e8f8dbcd3b8ff60e3c727bdcba497d13ee1383
removeprunedfunds removes all entries from mapTxSpends for the
inputs of the pruned tx. However, this is incorrect, because there could be
multiple entries from conflicting transactions (that shouldn't be
removed as well). This could lead to the wallet creating invalid
transactions, trying to double spend utxos.
The bug persists when the conflicting tx was mined, because
the wallet trusts its internal accounting instead of calling
AddToSpends again.
fab2f3df4b fuzz: Exclude too expensive inputs in descriptor_parse targets (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Accepting "expensive" fuzz inputs which have no real use-case is problematic, because it prevents the fuzz engine from spending time on the next useful fuzz input.
For example, those will take several seconds (!) and the flamegraph shows that base58 encoding is the cause:
```
curl -fLO 'f5abf41608'
curl -fLO '78cb317546'
FUZZ=mocked_descriptor_parse ./bld-cmake/bin/fuzz ./f5abf41608addcef3538da61d8096c2050235032
FUZZ=descriptor_parse ./bld-cmake/bin/fuzz ./78cb3175467f53b467b949883ee6072e92dbb267
```
This will also break 32-bit fuzzing, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/34110#issuecomment-3759461248.
Fix all issues by checking for `HasTooLargeLeafSize`.
Sorry for creating several pull requests to fix this class of issue, but I think this one should be the last one. 😅
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
reACK fab2f3df4b
frankomosh:
re-ACK fab2f3df4b
Tree-SHA512: 4ecf98ec4adc39f6e014370945fb1598cdd3ceba60f7209b00789ac1164b6d20e82a69d71f8419d9a40d57ee3fea36ef593c47fe48b584b6e8344c44f20a15c1
Aside from being more legible, changing the name of `CWallet::Create()`
also validates that every instance where a new wallet is `Create()`'ed
is handled in this branch.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's|\bCreate(|CreateNew(|g' src/wallet/wallet.cpp src/wallet/wallet.h src/wallet/test/util.cpp src/wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Writing the wallet's `CLIENT_VERSION` (which indicates the last version
to have touched a wallet) needs to be done on both wallet creation and
wallet loading.
The next commit removes the `PopulateWalletFromDatabase()` call from
wallet creation, but this behavior needs to be preserved, so this commit
factors setting `CLIENT_VERSION` out of `PopulateWalletFromDatabase()`
so that wallet creation can use it in the next commit.
Checking every SPKM in `CWallet::Create()` is not necessary, since the
only way presently for an SPKM to get added to `m_spk_managers` (the
return value of `GetAllScriptPubKeyMans()`) is through
`AddScriptPubKeyMan()`, which already invokes `MaybeUpdateBirthTime()`.
`m_keypool_size` must be set before `CWallet::PopulateWalletFromDB()`,
in order to move parsing of `-keypool` into `CWallet::LoadWalletArgs`,
`LoadWalletArgs()` invocation in `CWallet::Create()` must be moved
before `PopulateWalletFromDB()` is called.
This section is necessarily repetitive, makes CWallet::Create() easier
to read, and splits out functionality that will be useful when wallet
creation and loading are separated.
Review with `-color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
75b704df9d wallettool: Disallow creating new unnamed wallets (Ava Chow)
5875a9c502 wallet: disallow unnamed wallets in createwallet and restorewallet (Ava Chow)
d30ad4a912 wallet, rpc: Use HandleWalletError in createwallet (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
We've been moving in the direction that all wallets must have a name. Therefore, we shouldn't allow creating new unnamed wallets. `createwallet`, `restorewallet`, and the wallet tool's `create` and `createfromdump` all now require the user to provide a non-empty wallet name when creating/restoring a wallet.
The GUI is already enforcing this, but we were not enforcing it for RPCs or in the underlying `CreateWallet` and `RestoreWallet` functions.
Wallet migration does still need to be able to restore unnamed wallets, so there is a new argument to `RestoreWallet` to explicitly allow that behavior for migration only.
ACKs for top commit:
rkrux:
lgtm ACK 75b704df9d
polespinasa:
re ACK 75b704df9d
Tree-SHA512: 8bde76d0b091e9276788c69412934af3426da2a7a69a00f94072d36c1a075cd41744ecdd5fef2b72870c1351b76aae061f124f716bb23f4839be20c464fc5ebd
faa59b3679 util: Add Expected::swap() (MarcoFalke)
fabb47e4e3 util: Implement Expected::operator*()&& (MarcoFalke)
fab9721430 util: Implement Expected::value()&& and Expected::error()&& (MarcoFalke)
fac4800959 util: Add Expected<void, E> specialization (MarcoFalke)
fa6575d6c2 util: Make Expected::value() throw (MarcoFalke)
fa1de1103f util: Add Unexpected::error() (MarcoFalke)
faa109f8be test: refactor: Use BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL over BOOST_CHECK == (MarcoFalke)
fad4a9fe2b Set bugprone-unused-return-value.AllowCastToVoid (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Reviewers requested more member functions In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34006.
They are currently unused, but bring the port closer to the original `std::expected` implementation:
* Make `Expected::value()` throw when no value exists
* Add `Unexpected::error()` methods
* Add `Expected<void, E>` specialization
* Add `Expected::value()&&` and `Expected::error()&&` methods
* Add `Expected::swap()`
Also, include a tiny tidy fixup:
* tidy: Set `AllowCastToVoid` in the `bugprone-unused-return-value` check
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK faa59b3679
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faa59b3679. Thanks for the update. The commit I objected to is fixed now and the rest of the implementation seems good enough for code that's probably temporary.
hodlinator:
re-ACK faa59b3679
Tree-SHA512: b6ac28c1e7241837d9db83fe7534d713ca1283c20a77d2273743157d329f041ec0b503658d14b2f4425211808b61a88fed115d77149e0546825acd3bd9198edf
9c7e4771b1 test: Test listdescs with priv works even with missing priv keys (Novo)
ed945a6854 walletrpc: reject listdes with priv key on w-only wallets (Novo)
9e5e9824f1 descriptor: ToPrivateString() pass if at least 1 priv key exists (Novo)
5c4db25b61 descriptor: refactor ToPrivateString for providers (Novo)
2dc74e3f4e wallet/migration: use HavePrivateKeys in place of ToPrivateString (Novo)
e842eb90bb descriptors: add HavePrivateKeys() (Novo)
Pull request description:
_TLDR:
Currently, `listdescriptors [private=true]` will fail for a non-watch-only wallet if any descriptor has a missing private key(e.g `tr()`, `multi()`, etc.). This PR changes that while making sure `listdescriptors [private=true]` still fails if there no private keys. Closes #32078_
In non-watch-only wallets, it's possible to import descriptors as long as at least one private key is included. It's important that users can still view these descriptors when they need to create a backup—even if some private keys are missing ([#32078 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32078#issuecomment-2781428475)). This change makes it possible to do so.
This change also helps prevent `listdescriptors true` from failing completely, because one descriptor is missing some private keys.
### Notes
- The new behaviour is applied to all descriptors including miniscript descriptors
- `listdescriptors true` still fails for watch-only wallets to preserve existing behaviour https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24361#discussion_r920801352
- Wallet migration logic previously used `Descriptor::ToPrivateString()` to determine which descriptor was watchonly. This means that modifying the `ToPrivateString()` behaviour caused descriptors that were previously recognized as "watchonly" to be "non-watchonly". **In order to keep the scope of this PR limited to the RPC behaviour, this PR uses a different method to determine `watchonly` descriptors for the purpose of wallet migration.** A follow-up PR can be opened to update migration logic to exclude descriptors with some private keys from the `watchonly` migration wallet.
### Relevant PRs
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24361https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32186
### Testing
Functional tests were added to test the new behaviour
EDIT
**`listdescriptors [private=true]` will still fail when there are no private keys because non-watchonly wallets must have private keys and calling `listdescriptors [private=true]` for watchonly wallet returns an error**
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 9c7e4771b1
achow101:
ACK 9c7e4771b1
w0xlt:
reACK 9c7e4771b1 with minor nits
rkrux:
re-ACK 9c7e4771b1
Tree-SHA512: f9b3b2c3e5425a26e158882e39e82e15b7cb13ffbfb6a5fa2868c79526e9b178fcc3cd88d3e2e286f64819d041f687353780bbcf5a355c63a136fb8179698b60
Migration still needs to be able to restore unnamed wallets, so
allow_unnamed is added to RestoreWallet to explicitly allow that
behavior for migration only.
fa64d8424b refactor: Enforce readability-avoid-const-params-in-decls (MarcoFalke)
faf0c2d942 refactor: Avoid copies by using const references or by move-construction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Top level `const` in declarations is problematic for many reasons:
* It is often a typo, where one wanted to denote a const reference. For example `bool PSBTInputSignedAndVerified(const PartiallySignedTransaction psbt, ...` is missing the `&`. This will create a redundant copy of the value.
* In constructors it prevents move construction.
* It can incorrectly imply some data is const, like in an imaginary example `std::span<int> Shuffle(const std::span<int>);`, where the `int`s are *not* const.
* The compiler ignores the `const` from the declaration in the implementation.
* It isn't used consistently anyway, not even on the same line.
Fix some issues by:
* Using a const reference to avoid a copy, where read-only of the value is intended. This is only done for values that may be expensive to copy.
* Using move-construction to avoid a copy
* Applying `readability-avoid-const-params-in-decls` via clang-tidy
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
diff reACK fa64d8424b
hebasto:
ACK fa64d8424b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
sedited:
ACK fa64d8424b
Tree-SHA512: 293c000b4ebf8fdcc75259eb0283a2e4e7892c73facfb5c3182464d6cb6a868b7f4a6682d664426bf2edecd665cf839d790bef0bae43a8c3bf1ddfdd3d068d38
