fa4cb13b52 test: [doc] Manually unify stale headers (MarcoFalke)
fa5f297748 scripted-diff: [doc] Unify stale copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Historically, the upper year range in file headers was bumped manually
or with a script.
This has many issues:
* The script is causing churn. See for example commit 306ccd4, or
drive-by first-time contributions bumping them one-by-one. (A few from
this year: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32008,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31642,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32963, ...)
* Some, or likely most, upper year values were wrong. Reasons for
incorrect dates could be code moves, cherry-picks, or simply bugs in
the script.
* The upper range is not needed for anything.
* Anyone who wants to find the initial file creation date, or file
history, can use `git log` or `git blame` to get more accurate
results.
* Many places are already using the `-present` suffix, with the meaning
that the upper range is omitted.
To fix all issues, this bumps the upper range of the copyright headers
to `-present`.
Further notes:
* Obviously, the yearly 4-line bump commit for the build system (c.f.
b537a2c02a) is fine and will remain.
* For new code, the date range can be fully omitted, as it is done
already by some developers. Obviously, developers are free to pick
whatever style they want. One can list the commits for each style.
* For example, to list all commits that use `-present`:
`git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S 'present The Bitcoin'`.
* Alternatively, to list all commits that use no range at all:
`git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S '(c) The Bitcoin'`.
<!--
* The lower range can be wrong as well, so it could be omitted as well,
but this is left for a follow-up. A previous attempt was in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26817.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK fa4cb13b52
rkrux:
re-ACK fa4cb13b52
janb84:
ACK fa4cb13b52
Tree-SHA512: e5132781bdc4417d1e2922809b27ef4cf0abb37ffb68c65aab8a5391d3c917b61a18928ec2ec2c75ef5184cb79a5b8c8290d63e949220dbeab3bd2c0dfbdc4c5
The changes made here were:
| From | To |
|-------------------|------------------|
| `m.count(k)` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `!m.count(k)` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) > 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
The commit contains the trivial, mechanical refactors where it doesn't matter if the container can have multiple elements or not
Co-authored-by: Jan B <608446+janb84@users.noreply.github.com>
The changes made here were:
| From | To |
|------------------------|------------------|
| `m.find(k) == m.end()` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.find(k) != m.end()` | `m.contains(k)` |
This allows IsSorted() and IsConsistent() to be used by themselves.
IsSorted() with a precomputed set is used so that we don't create this
set multiple times.
Many edge cases exist when parents in a child-with-parents package can
spend each other. However, this pattern should also be uncommon in
normal use cases.
While allowing submitted packages to be slightly larger than what
may be allowed in the mempool to allow simpler reasoning
about contextual-less checks vs chain limits.
Duplicates of normal transactions would be found by looking for
conflicting inputs, but this doesn't catch identical empty transactions.
These wouldn't be valid but exiting early is good and AcceptPackage's
result sanity checks assume non-duplicate transactions.
