7bc64a8859 test: properly check for per-tx sigops limit (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently the per-tx sigops limit standardness check (bounded by `MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST`, throwing "bad-txns-too-many-sigops" if exceeded):
3f83c744ac/src/validation.cpp (L925-L927)
is only indirectly tested with the much higher per-block consensus limit (`MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST`):
3f83c744ac/test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py (L236-L242)
I.e. an increase in the per-tx limit up to the per-block one would still pass all of our tests. Refine that by splitting up the invalid tx template `TooManySigops` in a per-block and a per-tx template.
The involved functional tests taking use of these templates are `feature_block.py` and `p2p_invalid_txs.py`. Can be tested by applying e.g.
```diff
diff --git a/src/policy/policy.h b/src/policy/policy.h
index 2151ec13dd..e5766d2a55 100644
--- a/src/policy/policy.h
+++ b/src/policy/policy.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static constexpr unsigned int MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE{65};
/** Maximum number of signature check operations in an IsStandard() P2SH script */
static constexpr unsigned int MAX_P2SH_SIGOPS{15};
/** The maximum number of sigops we're willing to relay/mine in a single tx */
-static constexpr unsigned int MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST{MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST/5};
+static constexpr unsigned int MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST{MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST/5 + 4};
/** Default for -incrementalrelayfee, which sets the minimum feerate increase for mempool limiting or replacement **/
static constexpr unsigned int DEFAULT_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE{1000};
/** Default for -bytespersigop */
diff --git a/test/functional/mempool_accept.py b/test/functional/mempool_accept.py
```
where the tests succeed on master, but fail on this PR.
(Found by diving deeper into the jungle of current sig-ops limit, as preparation for reviewing the [BIP 54](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0054.md) draft and related preparatory PRs like #32521).
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 7bc64a8859
tapcrafter:
tACK 7bc64a8859
darosior:
ACK 7bc64a8859
instagibbs:
crACK 7bc64a8859
Tree-SHA512: 1365409349664a76a1d46b2fa358c0d0609fb17fffdd549423d22b61749481282c928be3c2fb428725735c82d319b4279f703bde01e94e4aec14bab206abb8cf
800b7cc42c cmake: Add missed `SSE41_CXXFLAGS` (Hennadii Stepanov)
028476e71f cmake: Remove `ENABLE_ARM_SHANI` from `bitcoin-build-config.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
1e900528d2 cmake: Remove `ENABLE_X86_SHANI` from `bitcoin-build-config.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
8689628e2e cmake: Remove `ENABLE_AVX2` from `bitcoin-build-config.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
a8e2342dca cmake: Remove `ENABLE_SSE41` from `bitcoin-build-config.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
`ENABLE_{SSE41,AVX2,X86_SHANI,ARM_SHANI}` are already conditionally defined for the [`bitcoin_crypto`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/crypto/CMakeLists.txt) target, and they are not used by any other targets. Defining them globally in `bitcoin-build-config.h` is therefore redundant.
Additionally, the previously missing `SSE41_CXXFLAGS` variable has been [added](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32550#issuecomment-2890918551).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 800b7cc42c
Tree-SHA512: da792a0b780c67b432b09c9288ca98d62545315c721fed13510d1c11f8bb0cddd9a4ed7a009b4d052471dda19d0641bbc1eae4805fc306d23bf9b4ef510089c8
785e1407b0 wallet: Use util::Error throughout AddWalletDescriptor (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
#32023 changed `AddWalletDescriptor` to return `util::Error`, but did not change all of the failure cases to do so. This may result in some callers continuing when there was actually an error. Unify all of the failure cases to use `util::Error` so that all callers handle `AddWalletDescriptor` errors in the same way.
The encapsulated return type is changed from `ScriptPubKeyMan*` to `std::reference_wrapper<DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan>`. This avoids having a value that can be interpreted as a bool, and also removes the need to constantly dynamic_cast the returned value. The only kind of `ScriptPubKeyMan` that can come out of `AddWalletDescriptor` is a `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` anyways.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 785e1407b0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 785e1407b0
furszy:
Code review ACK 785e1407b0
Tree-SHA512: 52a48263c8d4161a8c0419b7289c25b0986f8e3bcd10b639eeeb0b6862d08b6c5e70998d20070ab26b39ecd90ab83dc8b71c65d85f70626282cf8cc6abff50e7
ee045b61ef rpc, psbt: Require sighashes match for descriptorprocesspsbt (Ava Chow)
2b7682c372 psbt: use sighash type field to determine whether to remove non-witness utxos (Ava Chow)
28781b5f06 psbt: Add sighash types to PSBT when not DEFAULT or ALL (Ava Chow)
15ce1bd73f psbt: Enforce sighash type of signatures matches psbt (Ava Chow)
1f71cd337a wallet: Remove sighash type enforcement from FillPSBT (Ava Chow)
4c7d767e49 psbt: Check sighash types in SignPSBTInput and take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
a118256948 script: Add IsPayToTaproot() (Ava Chow)
d6001dcd4a wallet: change FillPSBT to take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
e58b680923 psbt: Return PSBTError from SignPSBTInput (Ava Chow)
2adfd81532 tests: Test PSBT sighash type mismatch (Ava Chow)
5a5d26d612 psbt: Require ECDSA signatures to be validly encoded (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, we do not add the sighash field to PSBTs at all, even when we have signed with a non-default sighash. This PR changes the behavior such that when we (attempt to) sign with a sighash other than DEFAULT or ALL, the sighash type field will be added to the PSBT to inform the later signers that a different sighash type was used by a signer. Notably, this is necessary for MuSig2 support as all signers must sign using the same sighash type, but the sighash is not provided in partial signatures.
Furthermore, because the sighash type can also be provided on the command line, we require that if both a command line sighash type and the sighash field is present, they must specify the same sighash type. However, this was being checked by the wallet, rather than the signing code, so the `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC was not enforcing this restriction at all, and in fact ignored the sighash field entirely. This PR refactors the checking code so that the underlying PSBT signing function `SignPSBTInput` does the check.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
rkrux:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
fjahr:
Code review ACK ee045b61ef
Tree-SHA512: 4ead5be1ef6756251b827f594beba868a145d75bf7f4ef6f15ad21f0ae4b8d71b38c83494e5a6b75f37fadd097178cddd93d614b962a2c72fc134f00ba2f74ae
faf55fc80b doc: Remove ParseInt mentions in documentation (MarcoFalke)
3333282933 refactor: Remove unused Parse(U)Int* (MarcoFalke)
fa84e6c36c bitcoin-tx: Reject + sign in MutateTxDel* (MarcoFalke)
face2519fa bitcoin-tx: Reject + sign in vout parsing (MarcoFalke)
fa8acaf0b9 bitcoin-tx: Reject + sign in replaceable parsing (MarcoFalke)
faff25a558 bitcoin-tx: Reject + sign in locktime (MarcoFalke)
dddd9e5fe3 bitcoin-tx: Reject + sign in nversion parsing (MarcoFalke)
fab06ac037 rest: Use SAFE_CHARS_URI in SanitizeString error msg (MarcoFalke)
8888bb499d rest: Reject + sign in /blockhashbyheight/ (MarcoFalke)
fafd43c691 test: Reject + sign when parsing regtest deployment params (MarcoFalke)
fa123afa0e Reject + sign when checking -ipcfd (MarcoFalke)
fa479857ed Reject + sign in SplitHostPort (MarcoFalke)
fab4c2967d net: Reject + sign when parsing subnet mask (MarcoFalke)
fa89652e68 init: Reject + sign in -*port parsing (MarcoFalke)
fa9c45577d cli: Reject + sign in -netinfo level parsing (MarcoFalke)
fa98041325 refactor: Use ToIntegral in CreateFromDump (MarcoFalke)
fa23ed7fc2 refactor: Use ToIntegral in ParseHDKeypath (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The legacy int parsing is problematic, because it accepts the `+` sign for unsigned integers. In all cases this is either:
* Useless, because the `+` sign was already rejected.
* Erroneous and inconsistent, when third party parsers reject it. (C.f. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32365)
* Confusing, because the `+` sign is neither documented, nor can it be assumed to be present.
Fix all issues by removing the legacy int parsing.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK faf55fc80b
brunoerg:
code review ACK faf55fc80b
Tree-SHA512: a311ab6a58fe02a37741c1800feb3dcfad92377b4bfb61b433b2393f52ba89ef45d00940972b2767b213a3dd7b59e5e35d5b659c586eacdfe4e565a77b12b19f
4b2cd0b41f test: check that creating a wallet does not log version info (Ava Chow)
39a483c8e9 test: Check that the correct versions are logged on wallet load (Ava Chow)
359ecd3704 walletdb: Log the wallet version after it has been read from disk (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
The wallet's version (in the minversion record) needs to be logged only after we have read it from disk. Otherwise, we always log the lowest version number of 10500 which is incorrect. Furthermore, it doesn't make sense to log the last client version number if the record didn't exist. This is a regression caused by #26021.
The wallet file version logging is moved inside of `LoadMinVersion` so that it is logged after the record is read. It will also log unconditionally if a version is read so that the version number is reported even when there is an error. The last client logging is split into its own log line that will only occur if a last client record is read. The only situation where we expect no version numbers to be logged is when a wallet is being created.
A test is added in the second commit to check that the version number is correctly logged on loading. This commit can be cherrypicked to master to verify that it fails there. The last commit adds an additional check that creating a new wallet does not log any version info at all.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4b2cd0b41f
janb84:
ACK 4b2cd0b41f
furszy:
ACK 4b2cd0b41f
rkrux:
ACK 4b2cd0b41f
Tree-SHA512: b30c76f414d87be6c14b42d2d3c8794a91a7e8601501f4c24641d51ff2b5c5144776563baf41ca1c38415844740b760b19a3e5791f78013b39984dfedd3b1de7
fa9198af55 lint: Check for missing trailing newline (MarcoFalke)
fa2b2aa27c lint: Add archived notes to default excludes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A missing trailing newline is harmless, but a bit problematic:
* `git` shows a warning by default
* After another line is appended, the diff will be verbose and `git blame` will be wrong for the "untouched" line.
Fix the problems by just requiring what is already the default, see also 663a9cabf8/.editorconfig (L9) and 663a9cabf8/test/lint/test_runner/src/main.rs (L327)
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
utACK fa9198af55
fanquake:
ACK fa9198af55
Tree-SHA512: d144eebdeee68fc3404aa4a66ecd5c130f907ed4b869bd300f6e9ed74d125561d1f4cdd6dd20d9e969471a7d007399f928f072d1c1f626275ca31f32bc23fdbc
32023 changed AddWalletDescriptor to return util::Error, but did not
change all of the failure cases to do so. This may result in some
callers continuing when there was actually an error. Unify all of the
failure cases to use util::Error so that all callers handle
AddWalletDescriptor errors in the same way.
The encapsulated return type is changed from ScriptPubKeyMan* to
std::reference_wrapper<DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan>. This avoids having a
value that can be interpreted as a bool, and also removes the need to
constantly dynamic_cast the returned value. The only kind of
ScriptPubKeyMan that can come out of AddWalletDescriptor is a
DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan anyways.
30a94b1ab9 test, wallet: Remove concurrent writes test (Ava Chow)
b44b7c03fe wallet: Write best block record on unload (Ava Chow)
876a2585a8 wallet: Remove unnecessary database Close step on shutdown (Ava Chow)
98a1a5275c wallet: Remove chainStateFlushed (Ava Chow)
7fd3e1cf0c wallet, bench: Write a bestblock record in WalletMigration (Ava Chow)
6d3a8b195a wallet: Replace chainStateFlushed in loading with SetLastBlockProcessed (Ava Chow)
7bacabb204 wallet: Update best block record after block dis/connect (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Implements the idea discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29652#issuecomment-2010579484
Currently, `m_last_block_processed` and `m_last_block_processed_height` are not guaranteed to match the block locator stored in the wallet, nor do either of those fields actually represent the last block that the wallet is synced up to. This is confusing and unintuitive.
This PR changes those last block fields to be updated whenever the wallet makes a change to the db for new transaction state found in new blocks. Whenever a block is received that contains a transaction relevant to the wallet, the last block locator will now be written to disk. Furthermore, every block disconnection will now write an updated locator.
To ensure that the locator is relatively recent and loading rescans are fairly quick in the event of unplanned shutdown, it is also now written every 144 blocks (~1 day). Additionally it is now written when the wallet is unloaded so that it is accurate when the wallet is loaded again.
Lastly, the `chainstateFlushed` notification in the wallet is changed to be a no-op. The best block locator record is no longer written when `chainstateFlushed` is received from the node since it should already be mostly up to date.
ACKs for top commit:
rkrux:
ACK 30a94b1ab9
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 30a94b1ab9
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 30a94b1ab9. Only changes since last review are using WriteBestBlock method more places and updating comments.
Tree-SHA512: 46117541f8aaf13dde57430e813b4bbbd5e146e2632769675803c8e65a82f149a7cc6026489a127d32684b90124bd2b7c28216dbcfa6a47447300e8f3814e029
Descriptor wallets are already created by default since v23.0, but
since the recent legacy wallet removal this parameter *must* be True
(see commit 9f04e02ffa), i.e. still
passing it wouldn't contain any information for test readers
anymore. So simply drop them in the functional tests in order to
reduce code bloat.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/, descriptors=True//g' $(git ls-files -- 'test/functional' ':(exclude)test/functional/wallet_backwards_compatibility.py')
sed -i '/descriptors=True,/d' ./test/functional/mempool_persist.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
b104d44227 test: Remove RPCOverloadWrapper (Ava Chow)
4d32c19516 test: Replace importpubkey (Ava Chow)
fe838dd391 test: Replace usage of addmultisigaddress (Ava Chow)
d314207779 test: Replace usage of importaddress (Ava Chow)
fcc457573f test: Replace importprivkey with wallet_importprivkey (Ava Chow)
94c87bbbd0 test: Remove unnecessary importprivkey from wallet_createwallet (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
`RPCOverloadWrapper` implemented overloads for legacy wallet only RPCs so that the same function call could be used within tests for both legacy wallets and descriptor wallets. With legacy wallets now removed, there is no need to continue to have these overloads.
For `importaddress`, `addmultisigaddress`, and `importpubkey`, the uses of these are converted to `importdescriptors`.
For `importprivkey`, a new helper function `wallet_imporprivkey` is introduced that does what the overload did. This is mainly to reduce verbosity as `importprivkey` was more widely used throughout the tests.
Some tests that used these RPCs are now also no longer relevant and have been removed.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK b104d44227
pablomartin4btc:
cr ACK b104d44227
rkrux:
ACK b104d44227
w0xlt:
ACK b104d44227
Tree-SHA512: ded2f73829e2ce28466d4a9738eb382783ad990daee5d1859dbc4d354e6f8eec0c483ed5ecb1287fe0dd24ac332065b733a30d71b126b841bd7cd49e9a094b6d
When dealing with URI parts, it seems more consistent to use
corresponding SAFE_CHARS_URI mode in error messages.
Co-Authored-By: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
Currently the per-tx sigops limit standardness check (bounded by
`MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIGOPS_COST`, throwing "bad-txns-too-many-sigops"
if exceeded) is only indirectly tested with the much higher per-block
consensus limit (`MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS_COST`), i.e. an increase in the
limit would still pass all tests. Refine that by splitting up the invalid
tx template `TooManySigops` in a per-block and a per-tx one.
The involved functional tests taking use of these templates are
`feature_block.py` and `p2p_invalid_txs.py`.
516f0689b5 refactor: re-enable UBSan implicit-sign-change in serialize.h (Lőrinc)
5827e93507 refactor: use consistent size type for serialization template parameters (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32154, the main goal of this PR is to reenable sanitizer checks for `serialize.h` since it's modified in a few other PRs.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 516f0689b5🎈
stickies-v:
ACK 516f0689b5, nice cleanup!
Tree-SHA512: 63da9bf1988a5b68e3c053b0ed786b8735f8f75b05763511522d1601b728b55798006e063137447615c266582622642d3226318fa83e488bd363f1756f8811e8
75a185ea3d test: add skip_if_running_under_valgrind() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Enable it in the USDT tests. The context (from 0xB10C):
> every time the tracepoint is reached a SIGTRAP is fired.
> No matter the tracepoint contents, even with an empty one.
> Valgrind intercepts SIGTRAP and aborts.
See discussion in #32374.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 75a185ea3d
willcl-ark:
ACK 75a185ea3d
Tree-SHA512: 7f45c3049ab39cc514024067bd6ac26598e99202c114b48459834c26c2e1273fa58af693878298e628a10c561b954850e49e76b39567b771bb0c0534a063a524
faf9082a5f test: Fix whitespace in prevector_tests.cpp (MarcoFalke)
fa7f04c8a7 refactor: Remove UB in prevector reverse iterators (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`rend()` creates a pointer with offset `-1`. This is UB, according to the C++ standard: https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
When an expression J that has integral type is added to [...] an
expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
... if P points to a (possibly-hypothetical) array element i of an
array object x with n elements [...] the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n [...]
Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
Also, it is unclear why the functions exist at all, when stdlib utils such as `std::reverse_iterator{it}` or `std::views::reverse` can be used out of the box.
So remove them, along with the ubsan suppressions, that are no longer used.
I've tagged this a refactor, because the code was always dead (unused outside of tests). And since commit 2925bd537c it was completely dead. Also, I could not find a sanitizer that detects this type of UB.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
tested ACK faf9082a5f
achow101:
ACK faf9082a5f
stickies-v:
ACK faf9082a5f, nice find.
theuni:
utACK faf9082a5f
Tree-SHA512: 31511d520a1c0fdd65c2e5f1a8ef6fd17464303b6bff88a5d9d9577adfee849d431deb510882b6f4e15e8fb7168861bc0d26fca3bed4278f57a9d6e7b1235dce
4b24186756 test: add test for decoding PSBT with MuSig2 PSBT key types (BIP 373) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8ba245cb83 test: add constants for MuSig2 PSBT key types (BIP 373) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #31247 (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31247#pullrequestreview-2427834909) and adds a functional test for decoding PSBTs (using the `decodepsbt` RPC) with MuSig2 per-input and per-output types. The first commit adds the new MuSig2 key types to the test frameworks and extends the PSBT serialization to cope with lists of bytestrings.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4b24186756
rkrux:
re-ACK 4b24186
Tree-SHA512: f12919f71b3fff74df1d7ddaa8db455b1b139f7abd51d7f3fa5d750fc7dd613454b438c4e0dedad679476d414fa1da43ef1121e486b0bdfd97d5ef8bdf37f060
Since CWallet::chainStateFlushed is now no-op, this test no longer tests
the concurrent writes scenario. There are no other cases where multiple
DatabaseBatches are open at the same time.
When a block is connected, if the new block had anything relevant to the
wallet, update the best block record on disk. If not, also sync the best
block record to disk every 144 blocks.
Also reuse the new WriteBestBlock method in BackupWallet.
Made every signed/unsigned conversion in the serialization helpers explicit so the UBSan `implicit-sign-change` check passes and the `serialize.h` suppression can be dropped.
For consistency, a few other simple changes were also applied to the serialization helpers:
* remove redundant `inline` on function templates;
* unify formatting to make the differences between similar methods obvious.
e7ad86e1ca test: fix another intermittent failure in wallet_basic.py (Martin Zumsande)
07350e204d test: Fix intermittent failure in wallet_basic.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes two rare failures that happened in the CI:
#27249:
There could be a race with outstanding TxAddedToMempool notifications being applied to the soon-to-be created wallet:
1. importdescriptors during rescan sets status to `TxStateConfirmed`
2. old `transactionAddedToMempool` notification changes status back to `TxStateInMempool`
3. If the listunspent call happens here the test will fail
4. blockConnected notification will change the status back to `TxStateConfirmed` (so it's not a persistent failure)
I could reproduce this by adding a 100 microsecond sleep to `AddToWallet()`, the fix is to add a sync, so `transactionAddedToMempool` notifications won't affect the new wallet anymore.
#32456:
During init, the test framework will start using rpc after the mempool was loaded.
It will not wait for `start()` / `postInitProcess` or outstanding `transactionAddedToMempool` notifications (which would both set the status to `TxStateInMempool`), leading to
a possible race, in which `listunspent` can be called while the tx is still in `Inactive` status.
Can be reproduced by adding two sleeps: To init before calling `start()` for the chain clients, plus to `transactionAddedToMempool` in `wallet.cpp`.
Prevent this by processing outstanding notifications.
Fixes#27249Fixes#32456
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK e7ad86e1ca🎩
Tree-SHA512: 1f1a11e5c8e1c6d3c39a49401c2c5122befdbbec25c0451953f5bfe8dfb53221ada552a68006e266570addda12bb16c1b9b1e49ad2198c33d91c4b96b764d73e
Enable it in the USDT tests. The context (from 0xB10C):
> every time the tracepoint is reached a SIGTRAP is fired.
> No matter the tracepoint contents, even with an empty one.
> Valgrind intercepts SIGTRAP and aborts.
See discussion in #32374.
rend() creates a pointer with offset -1. This is UB, according to the
C++ standard: https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
When an expression J that has integral type is added to [...] an
expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
... if P points to a (possibly-hypothetical) array element i of an
array object x with n elements [...] the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n [...]
Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
Also, it is unclear why the functions exist at all, when stdlib utils
such as std::reverse_iterator{it} or std::views::reverse can be used out
of the box.
So remove them, along with the ubsan suppressions, that are no longer
used.
2aa63d511a test: Use uninvolved pruned node in feature_pruning undo test (enoch)
772ba7f9ce test: Fix nTimes typo in feature_pruning test (enoch)
Pull request description:
This PR contains two commits:
1. Fixes a typo in feature_pruning.py where 'nTimes' was incorrectly
used instead of 'nTime'. This typo caused the test to always reset
mine_large_blocks.nTime to 0, rather than only on the first run.
2. Fixes the test failure exposed by the typo fix. The
test_pruneheight_undo_presence test was failing because it was using
node 2, which is involved in reorg testing and could be on a
different chain than other nodes. The solution switches to using
node 5, which is also a pruned node but isn't involved in reorg
testing.
Testing:
- Ran test/functional/feature_pruning.py multiple times to verify
consistent passing
- Verified that the test now passes with the correct nTime variable name
- Confirmed the test behavior matches the intended functionality of
verifying pruned block availability
- Ran the full test suite to ensure the changes did not introduce any
regressions or affect other tests
Thanks to fjahr for his assistance in diagnosing the issue and
suggesting the solution.
This fixes the test failure reported in #32249
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 2aa63d511a
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 2aa63d511a
naiyoma:
tACK 2aa63d511a
stratospher:
tested ACK 2aa63d5. verified that `nTime` is being incremented now.
Tree-SHA512: a543528fd4eeb30e978c0b43cfa109768252edaf1f94679dbbc7fe684122c00da34224e2cc1abd2a265af1b267eef1cd34246207946cf7d8e93d2c0f11aa56d8
During init, the test framework will start using rpc after the
mempool was loaded. It will not wait for postInitProcess or
outstanding transactionAddedToMempool notifications, leading to
a possible race, in which listunspent is being called while the
tx is still in Inactive status. Prevent this by processing
outstanding notifications.
There could be a race with outstanding TxAddedToMempool notifications
being applied to the soon-to-be created wallet.
Fixes an intermittent timeout reproducable by adding a sleep to
AddToWallet.
a58cb3b1c1 qa: sanity check mined block have their coinbase timelocked to height (Antoine Poinsot)
8f2078af6a miner: timelock coinbase transactions (Antoine Poinsot)
788aeebf34 qa: use prev height as nLockTime for coinbase txs created in unit tests (Antoine Poinsot)
c76dbe9b8b qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in fuzz targets (Antoine Poinsot)
9c94069d8b contrib: timelock coinbase transactions in signet miner (Antoine Poinsot)
a5f52cfcc4 qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in functional tests (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
The Consensus Cleanup soft fork proposal includes enforcing that coinbase transactions set their
nLockTime field to the block height minus 1, as well as their nSequence such as to not disable the
timelock. If such a fork were to be activated by Bitcoin users, miners need to be ready to produce
compliant blocks at the risk of losing substantial amounts mining would-be invalid blocks. As miners
are unfamously slow to upgrade, it's good to make this change as early as possible.
Although Bitcoin Core's GBT implementation does not provide the `coinbasetxn` field, and mining
pool software crafts the coinbase on its own, updating the Bitcoin Core mining code is a first step
toward convincing pools to update their (often closed source) code. A possible followup is also to
introduce new fields to GBT. In addition, this first step also makes it possible to test future
Consensus Cleanup changes.
The commit making the change also updates a bunch of seemingly-unrelated tests. This is because those tests were asserting error messages based on the txid of transactions involved, and changing the coinbase transaction structure necessarily changes the txid of all tests' transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK a58cb3b1c1
achow101:
ACK a58cb3b1c1
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK a58cb3b1c1
Tree-SHA512: a2aae009a187eb760d34435f518a895ee76c6b02a667eb030ddf6bd584da6e8eae2737d974dbf81a928d60c07bcb4820f055adc067e18d8819640db0240bb513
